Back to @TeamSkeet's profile

TeamSkeet engagement report

@TeamSkeet - 521K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.066%
of 521K followers
Per impression
1.22%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
5.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
343
interactions (median)
Saved
0.396%
111 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.6/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 343 interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 31x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #teamskeetallstar, #bbc, #juliajames.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #teamskeetallstar, #bbc, #juliajames.

Compared with accounts its own size

TeamSkeet's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.066%, TeamSkeet sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link95% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 202631x their median

    He wanted the contract. They wanted his daughter. @OfficialCocolov did not say no. x @JasonSarcinelli Under The Table Episode 2 is live now. πŸ˜ˆπŸ’¦ Watch it. βž‘οΈπŸ”— https://t.co/OKHpE9zTww https://t.co/GnLEJVXsN8

    10K598161203K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202620x their median

    ⭐ @OfficialCocolov gives it all. Under the Table Episode 2 is streaming now. πŸ˜ˆπŸ’¦ x @JasonSarcinelli Watch it. πŸ‘‡ πŸ”— https://t.co/lhUvUAgNDK https://t.co/yfqMbr122k

    6.3K532161142K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202619x their median

    "Don't worry, I'm a big girl." She had to be. To keep the house, @liltitsbigmind had to face the landlord. @DoriandelIsla @JamesBartholet Under the Table Episode 5 comes tomorrow. πŸ†πŸ”₯ Watch here βž‘οΈπŸ”— https://t.co/UdDnJ8iaSR https://t.co/VEpZBLeuXl

    6.2K41691125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20265.7x their median

    πŸ’ΈπŸ†• @RustyNailsXXX made a deal. @harlowxwest paid the price. @mrstudshit Under the Table Episode 3 is live. πŸ†πŸ”₯ Watch now. πŸ‘‡ βž‘οΈπŸ”— https://t.co/lou3eV8WNo https://t.co/rbRb2DX817

    1.8K1381276K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.6x their median

    🎞️ Nina is about to get married so her friends throw her a surprise bachelorette party πŸ€«πŸ’¦ @Ninawhitexxx @NIKKISLICK_XOXO @SatineSummers @NaudiNala https://t.co/UnGk76coBK

    1.8K913021K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.4x their median

    Under the Table Episode 2 belongs to @OfficialCocolov. She is the one who pays. She is the one who takes it all. πŸ˜ˆπŸ’¦ x @JasonSarcinelli Watch her performance. πŸ†πŸ’¦πŸ‘‡ πŸ”— https://t.co/nG9f3Orv7X https://t.co/sCAdnBZ4Cz

    1.7K1146036K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.2x their median

    The deal was sealed. Under the Table Ep 2. πŸ‘πŸ”₯ @OfficialCocolov @JasonSarcinelli FULL βž‘οΈπŸ”— https://t.co/UkHdA29RMx https://t.co/3ZKZsFWnFI

    1.7K1175042K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.8x their median

    🎞️ She's hungry πŸ†πŸ˜ˆ @niableuofficial https://t.co/eytpq6ciJ7

    1.5K866144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.4x their median

    😏 Watch @selina_imai & @DannyMountain10 in Under the Table. FULL βž‘οΈπŸ”— https://t.co/nrNaPvxuah https://t.co/7CflI3Enki

    1.4K11810137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.3x their median

    πŸ€€πŸ’¦ @lil_nemo00 Watch More ➑️ https://t.co/9uQyWqy0RD https://t.co/iW5bTB1TH9

    1.4K837025K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#teamskeetallstar#bbc#juliajames

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 343 interactions against 521K followers, an engagement rate of 0.066%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 31x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #teamskeetallstar, #bbc, #juliajames.

What is TeamSkeet's engagement rate on X?
TeamSkeet (@TeamSkeet) has an engagement rate of 0.066%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 521,492 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.066%, TeamSkeet sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TeamSkeet have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TeamSkeet post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going