Back to @TatoCepeda's profile

Tato Cepeda engagement report

@TatoCepeda - 279K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.908%
of 279K followers
Per impression
5.51%
46K views on a typical post
Reach
16.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.908%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 5.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #increíble.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tato Cepeda's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.908%, Tato Cepeda sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.679% to 2.56%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 142 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 202628x their median

    ¿Y quien dice que sólo los niños sueñan con salir a la cancha con sus ídolos? El Betis saltó hoy al terreno de juego con los 11 socios más antiguos. Los tipazos no paran de hablar y de sonreír. El sueño del abuelo🫶 https://t.co/uqVjuF625a

    61K7.4K6058572.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202612x their median

    "Spoilers" Porque cuatro amigos fueron a ver "Spiderman: Brand New Day" al cine y justo se sentaron al lado de un chico que ya la había visto, pero que ahora fue junto a una amiga. El hombre estuvo dando spoilers y contándole la película a la chica, por lo que terminó en una discusión con los cuatro amigos y casi se van a los golpes.

    28K1.4K6904492.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202612x their median

    Con el regreso a clases ya huele a chisme y a envidias de las mamis en el grupo de WhatsApp... 😳🤣 https://t.co/5v800PWPE8

    27K2.1K4281521.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20263.1x their median

    La gente ya anda tan alienada y frita del cerebro que cree que “política” se reduce a gobiernos, partidos, izquierdas/derechas. Política es todo lo que hagas y afecte a a tu entorno/ comunidad.

    6.4K1.3K392246K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20262.9x their median

    Muy pero muy interesante. Escuchen lo que hacen con los corruptos. El fondo y trasfondo de su respuesta a final de cuentas es lo que quiere un ciudadano. https://t.co/CCLIGMdvou

    5.9K1.1K14451194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.8x their median

    Este debe ser el gol más épico del fútbol en el mundo. https://t.co/HD6mwvZ2wT

    6.1K8367017486K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.7x their median

    Me dijo "desnudate" y yo le mostré este video de James despues de eliminar a Uruguay. Me puse a llorar y ella se burló. Quería ver la desnudez de mi cuerpo; yo, tonto, le mostré la desnudez de mi alma. https://t.co/DPm917NsUI

    5.8K1.0K2963164K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20262.5x their median

    #INCREÍBLE 😶 Una mujer adulta mayor fue captada en video cometiendo una peligrosa maniobra tras adelantar vehículos de carga pesada a bordo de una silla de ruedas eléctrica en plena carretera; aunque se desconocen la fecha y el lugar exacto del hecho, las imágenes causan asombro https://t.co/JJLP9Lh0l4

    5.2K524292217272K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20262.4x their median

    El que diga que el rock es “apolítico” o no ha oído lo suficiente o no entendió nada de lo que oyó….

    5.0K8081883481K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.2x their median

    No vi a ninguno de esos malparidos therians identificado como perro de búsqueda y rescate ayudando.

    5.1K435302878K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#increíble

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.908%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 5.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 70K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is Tato Cepeda's engagement rate on X?
Tato Cepeda (@TatoCepeda) has an engagement rate of 0.908%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 278,963 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.908%, Tato Cepeda sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TatoCepeda have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TatoCepeda post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going