Back to @TamelaJaeger's profile

Tamela Jaeger engagement report

@TamelaJaeger - 80K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.71%
of 80K followers
Per impression
21.8%
6.3K views on a typical post
Reach
7.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.222%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 1.71%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,689 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 21.8% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tamela Jaeger's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,689 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.71%, Tamela Jaeger sits above the 75th percentile of the 208,343 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.684% to 2.58%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.144%
p750.684%
p902.58%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 208,343 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,311 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.144%
75th percentile0.684%
90th percentile2.58%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 7, 202626x their median

    SCOTT BESSENT SAYS ELIZABETH WARREN HAS SENT HIM 141 LETTERS, AND HIS TEAM IS PUTTING TOGETHER "FOR DUMMIES" GUIDES JUST FOR HER. 🤣 He says some of her letters show she doesn't understand foreign exchange, so now she's getting bond markets for dummies too. That tells you what Democrats plan to do if they win Congress next month. They won't fix a single problem, they'll just bury this administration in letters, hearings, and endless investigations. Bessent says they'll try to block everything Trump is doing to cut regulations and grow the economy. Don't hand Elizabeth Warren a gavel, because she clearly can't even handle a textbook 😂🇺🇸

    28K7.0K305162377K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202621x their median

    JUST IN: AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile stocks all crash over 7% after Elon Musk's SpaceX $SPCX announces plans to turn Starlink into major US mobile carrier. https://t.co/p8s153WBCW

    25K2.5K7785081.4M viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/NDeztwxJk0

    12K2.2K1.3K117644K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20269.3x their median

    BREAKING: FBI Director Kash Patel just announced that NGO Southern Poverty Law Center’s Director of Intelligence Heidi Beirich has been ARRESTED and CHARGED with the following crimes: - Wire fraud conspiracy - Conspiracy to submit false statements to a federally insured bank - Conspiracy to commit concealment money laundering “Beirich played a primary role in this scheme. From at least 2007-2023, Beirich allegedly helped orchestrate this fraudulent activity worth approximately $4.2 million, conspiring with SPLC to defraud donors, obtaining money through these materially false and fraudulent pretenses and omissions to pay leadership of the very violent organizations SPLC claimed to oppose.” The massive fraud is all crashing down!

    9.2K3.2K28312470K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20266.7x their median

    Oh my word. Mike Rogers just HUMILIATED Communist Abdul El-Sayed on live television. He called out all of his lies and left him completely speechless. You can see on physically uncomfortable he is. "He lied about being a physician. He lied now about being an EGYPTIAN CITIZEN. I can't figure out WHAT he is!” "He's taken money from groups associated and support the Muslim Brotherhood. He has taken money from individuals on his campaign who openly support Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda. From the GEORGE SOROS family." https://t.co/33AvE5bYCu

    7.4K1.6K16638217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20265.1x their median

    Woman in Philly is standing in front of an Avride delivery robot so it can’t move. The person filming her: “Miss, you can’t block that. That’s somebody’s food that they paid for. They may be sick. They may be waiting on it.” Then: “You’re a nasty spirit. That’s what you are.” Not a protest. Not a bit. Just a sidewalk argument with a box that has someone’s dinner in it.

    5.1K835956114777K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.9x their median

    THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME!!!❤️🇺🇸🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/qkneEDwz9V

    5.3K1.0K2977561K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20264.6x their median

    My husband and I could use prayer because we are in the cone for this hurricane.

    4.7K3961.2K4430K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.5x their median

    🚨 OMG. In a power move, President Trump just revealed he's building the White House ballroom-military complex at the level of nuclear strength so a Democrat president CAN'T DEMOLISH IT — NY Mag He's a literal legend 🔥 "You could take a jackhammer and go to those columns and stand there for two days at full blast — and you wouldn't even see a mark. It's nuclear concrete...it's meant for if there's a nuclear attack. I'm not sure you could take it down," Trump said "Everyone will always know in perpetuity that it was built by Donald Trump." "I don't think they could [rip it down] — physically." "It's made with the most powerful steel, welded together and concrete, that is so hard and strong it's used in NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS."

    5.1K9369020117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20263.9x their median

    NOW THIS IS HOW YOU PLAY THE GAME!!!😎🇺🇸🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/EYZFLxwU4q

    4.1K9621865857K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 1.71%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,689 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 6.3K times each, and 21.8% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 35K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Tamela Jaeger's engagement rate on X?
Tamela Jaeger (@TamelaJaeger) has an engagement rate of 1.71%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 80,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.71%, Tamela Jaeger sits above the 75th percentile of the 208,343 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TamelaJaeger have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,689 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TamelaJaeger post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going