Back to @Taibo2's profile

Paco Taibo2📝 engagement report

@Taibo2 - 368K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 368K followers
Per impression
0.967%
2.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
22
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.967% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.618% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 989 interactions, about 45x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #adolf, #cienciaficción, #desdeelfondo.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #adolf, #cienciaficción, #desdeelfondo.

Compared with accounts its own size

Paco Taibo2📝's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Paco Taibo2📝 sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,130 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video32% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link68% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 68% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 76 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 202645x their median

    Impresionante la #RepúblicaDeLectores que visitó hoy la red de librerias del @FCEMexico Una gran fiesta popular de los libros https://t.co/Qn219dAg9C

    78518216613K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20267.9x their median

    No se pierdan a @HoracioFranco este viernes 4 de Septiembre a la 6pm en la libreria #RosarioCastellanos como parte de las actividades de la #GranVentaNocturna del @FCEMexico https://t.co/03itHaxHjz

    8026491818K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20267.2x their median

    Mi recomendación de la semana #Adolf de Osamu Tezuka https://t.co/XYVPfDBTRB

    12631116.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20265.7x their median

    Próximo sábado 26 de Septiembre en la @VSCLS https://t.co/cFdqAxLT8t

    8737013.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.8x their median

    Hace unos años en la @FSAllende con Rafael López Giral y Marcela Ahumada. https://t.co/DfVTUMPwDj

    757106.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.3x their median

    Ayer en #DesdeElFondo recomendé #VisionesPeligrosas una extraordinaria antologia de cuentos de #CienciaFicción editada por #HarlanEllison @FCEMexico https://t.co/49oN5SBO75

    4822112.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.8x their median

    Paco Ignacio Taibo II https://t.co/qnSKIHaLwV

    4316125.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.8x their median

    Elena Poniatowska https://t.co/kBJ970P8Te

    4614012.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.0x their median

    SACCO Y VANZETTI Giuilano Montaldo https://t.co/2SzzdvHIyd

    3311002.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.0x their median

    Reseña de "El libro de la imaginación" de Edmundo Valadés. Uno de los grandes clásicos del catálogo del @FCEMexico https://t.co/rYuZWXr0km

    3111012.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#adolf#cienciaficción#desdeelfondo#granventanocturna#harlanellison

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 22 interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.967% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.618% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 68% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 989 interactions, about 45x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #adolf, #cienciaficción, #desdeelfondo.

What is Paco Taibo2📝's engagement rate on X?
Paco Taibo2📝 (@Taibo2) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 368,299 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Paco Taibo2📝 sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,130 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Taibo2 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Taibo2 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going