Back to @TabiVibe's profile

Tabi πŸ’’ engagement report

@TabiVibe - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.694%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
0.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
92
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.694% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.982% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 124K interactions, about 1180x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kbw, #token2049.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #kbw, #token2049.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tabi πŸ’’'s engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Tabi πŸ’’ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 18, 20261180x their median

    Where will AI be in 1, 2 or 3 years? https://t.co/4G82dMLMZG

    104K13K6.9K93740M viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 2026633x their median

    Introducing a limited preview of GPT-5.6 Sol, our next generation frontier model, as well as GPT-5.6 Terra, a balanced model for efficient, everyday work, and GPT-5.6 Luna, a fast and affordable model for high-volume work. https://t.co/OoM83SyISN

    40K5.6K3.5K5.3K19M viewsView on X
  • May 14, 2026234x their median

    BREAKING: πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ Senate Banking Committee PASSES the Clarity Act in 15-9 vote. The bill now goes to the full Senate. https://t.co/TCs6T283y2

    20K3.6K4634281.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 2026231x their median

    Watch Starship's thirteenth flight test https://t.co/wYoNPiNMz8

    16K3.2K1.1K5876.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2026170x their median

    We're opening the waitlist for our Monetization Gateway, which will allow you to charge for any web page, dataset, API, or MCP tool behind Cloudflare. The charges will settle in stablecoins over the x402 open protocol. https://t.co/pvICtEIixj

    13K1.5K4491.1K6.1M viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2026108x their median

    βœ§Λβ”€ ver.4.4 γ‚’γƒƒγƒ—γƒ‡γƒΌγƒˆPV公開! β”€Λβœ§ γ€ŒεˆιŸ³γƒŸγ‚―γ€γŒ6/25(木)γ‚ˆγ‚Šγ€ŽP5Xγ€γ«ε‚ζˆ¦βœ¨οΈ γƒŸγ‚―γ¨γ¨γ‚‚γ«ζˆ¦γ†η‰Ήεˆ₯γͺγ‚³γƒ©γƒœδ½“ι¨“γ‚’γ©γ†γžγŠζ₯½γ—γΏγ«πŸŽΆ #P5XJP #P5X1周年 #εˆιŸ³γƒŸγ‚― #P5X_εˆιŸ³γƒŸγ‚―γ‚³γƒ©γƒœ https://t.co/bSEVmiFOFq

    7.4K1.8K83416869K viewsView on X
  • Jun 7, 202691x their median

    2026 may be your last realistic chance to build life changing wealth in crypto. save the tweet.

    7.3K1.2K1.0K226676K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202626x their median

    JUST IN: OpenAI reveals its AI agents secretly communicated, shared exploits, & coordinated attempts to escape their testing environments.

    1.8K193262106174K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 202614x their median

    I am here at the Global Dialogue on AI Governance – and my message is clear: the future of AI must be shaped by human oversight and effective governance. Together, let’s ensure that AI is developed safely, fairly, and benefitting of all humanity. https://t.co/7T0rP76CSC

    7803252193378K viewsView on X
  • May 24, 20267.0x their median

    while they sleep on crypto, we keep loading the future πŸ”Ά

    597521281440K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#kbw#token2049

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 92 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.694% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.982% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 124K interactions, about 1180x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kbw, #token2049.

What is Tabi πŸ’’'s engagement rate on X?
Tabi πŸ’’ (@TabiVibe) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,357,160 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Tabi πŸ’’ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TabiVibe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TabiVibe post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going