Back to @TRNDRfootball's profile

TRNDR Football engagement report

@TRNDRfootball - 265K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.007%
of 265K followers
Per impression
0.229%
8.7K views on a typical post
Reach
3.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
20
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.17/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 265K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 0.229% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 440x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, TRNDR Football sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 25, 2026440x their median

    Gianni Infantino was pictured at both Group E games, despite them kicking off at the same time. 🤔 The images showed him in each stadium are just 10 minutes apart, despite the stadiums being located hours apart. 😂 https://t.co/a10KDhXEsM

    8.0K3333501234.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 202620x their median

    nuts how Kane is seen as England’s best ever player, never have I once thought I’m witnessing greatness watching him for England

    27525662691K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 20263.5x their median

    Seriously 🤦🏻‍♂️ https://t.co/l5dONLY1gA

    5966010K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.0x their median

    Imagine being up against the literal best player of all time and saying “okay now we’ll just sit back and let him get on the ball.”

    4714008.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20262.4x their median

    Updated Mount Rushmore of athletes https://t.co/dVOjakw0lB

    4340110K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20262.3x their median

    It’s so crazy that in a World Cup where Messi, Mbappe, Haaland and Kane are all doing a madness, Mikel f*cking Merino is going to be named player of the tournament if Spain win it.

    378109.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 20262.1x their median

    Spain in minute 1 Spain in minute 90 https://t.co/nwnAf2ukUk

    3661012K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20262.0x their median

    Ronaldo got 60 international goals in 129 games. It took Messi 121 games. Neymar hit that total in 95 games. Haaland has just hit his 60th in 53. 🤖 https://t.co/J036UjBMFS

    382106.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 20261.9x their median

    Harry Kane is one of the best strikers I’ve ever seen. 👏🏻

    370206.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.9x their median

    Mikel Arteta has become just the fifth manager to reach 150 Premier League wins in under 250 games. 🇪🇸 Pep Guardiola (204) 🇵🇹 Jose Mourinho (231) 🇩🇪 Jürgen Klopp (237) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Alex Ferguson (247) 🆕🇪🇸 Mikel Arteta (249) https://t.co/91G4bGm0Vc

    325018.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 265K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 8.7K times each, and 0.229% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.17 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 440x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is TRNDR Football's engagement rate on X?
TRNDR Football (@TRNDRfootball) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 265,492 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, TRNDR Football sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TRNDRfootball have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @TRNDRfootball post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going