Back to @TJLakers01's profile

Tim Lawrence engagement report

@TJLakers01 - 331K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 331K followers
Per impression
10.3%
2.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
282
interactions (median)
Saved
0.073%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.1/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 282 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.8K times each, and 10.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.832% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 916 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026. Recurring tag: #prayhard.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tim Lawrence's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, Tim Lawrence sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 321 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 20263.2x their median

    BREAKING: 86% chance Fed "hikes" interest rates tomorrow — an all-time high. https://t.co/gwRz8WFzRp

    6828683653.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    While many differences may separate us here on earth, when we worship before the Lord in heaven, we will approach His throne with unity of heart, mind, and soul. We will exclaim together the awesomeness of His glory and praise Him for His righteousness and all He has done through His mercy and grace. God is great in the powerful name of Jesus Amen. Praise the Lord!

    195865632.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Praise the Lord! @LisaWal24884807 @x4Eileen @goldisez @emma6USA @thandar324 @Zegdie @V_Lady2024 @SirFlyzalot @GabiNga1 @NolaCookPatriot @Rammie24 @bdonesem @LauraMi25356713 @1NJConservative @JanetTX_Blessed @Tex_2A @5dme81 @1mZerOCool @cinrui @Brinx65 @DragonSword778 @UnsinkableDolly @skipmav @IndyBeginsAt220 @FM_NoAlgos @DawgRight @mgtexp @jake22_h @Primrose771646 @WONDERTIME5 @Spooks @Imcg_2 @ken_kmak8542 @1Cmacman @bp_dare @firebelly_flame @pmakze @chickenballs270 @Coastie69ers @RoyaleAuto @Just_Carly_ @JimmyLemons15 @SFG1776 @JohnSleeper51 @cg59runner @gswit11156 @Todd4USA @RockyMtMama1

    132877903.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026

    We are never victims of our circumstances. The Lord can bring blessing out of the gravest situation. He never wants us to run from our problems. He wants us to face them with His help. That is so cool in the powerful name of Jesus Amen. Praise the Lord! https://t.co/D5LnoS9TuZ

    166754502.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    No one holds you down and forces you to sin. Satan cannot make you do anything, but he will do all he can do to deceive you into dishonoring God. Stay strong in the powerful name of Jesus Amen. Praise the Lord! https://t.co/S3ZOzePj0F

    171654512.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Praise the Lord! @LisaWal24884807 @x4Eileen @goldisez @emma6USA @thandar324 @Zegdie @V_Lady2024 @SirFlyzalot @GabiNga1 @NolaCookPatriot @Rammie24 @bdonesem @LauraMi25356713 @1NJConservative @JanetTX_Blessed @Tex_2A @5dme81 @1mZerOCool @cinrui @DragonSword778 @Brinx65 @UnsinkableDolly @skipmav @IndyBeginsAt220 @FM_NoAlgos @DawgRight @mgtexp @jake22_h @Primrose771646 @WONDERTIME5 @Spooks @Imcg_2 @ken_kmak8542 @1Cmacman @bp_dare @firebelly_flame @pmakze @chickenballs270 @Coastie69ers @RoyaleAuto @Just_Carly_ @JimmyLemons15 @SFG1776 @JohnSleeper51 @cg59runner @gswit11156 @Todd4USA @RockyMtMama1

    118867612.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026

    Praise the Lord! @LisaWal24884807 @x4Eileen @goldisez @emma6USA @thandar324 @Zegdie @V_Lady2024 @SirFlyzalot @GabiNga1 @NolaCookPatriot @Rammie24 @bdonesem @LauraMi25356713 @1NJConservative @JanetTX_Blessed @Tex_2A @5dme81 @1mZerOCool @cinrui @NancyMar2025 @Brinx65 @UnsinkableDolly @skipmav @IndyBeginsAt220 @FM_NoAlgos @DawgRight @mgtexp @jake22_h @WONDERTIME5 @Spooks @Imcg_2 @ken_kmak8542 @1Cmacman @pmakze @bp_dare @firebelly_flame @PilgrimsPatriot @chickenballs270 @TaylorTweets007 @RoyaleAuto @Just_Carly_ @JimmyLemons15 @SFG1776 @JohnSleeper51 @cg59runner @gswit11156 @Todd4USA @RighterThanRigh @DragonSword778 @thompsonb2569

    122836522.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    God designed prayer to be a conversation , not a monologue. When we bring our heart to Him, we should linger-making space for Him to speak into our stillness (Ps. 46:10). God is great in the powerful name of Jesus Amen. Praise the Lord! https://t.co/YQx3H7tPOe

    142653821.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Praise the Lord! @LisaWal24884807 @x4Eileen @goldisez @emma6USA @thandar324 @Zegdie @V_Lady2024 @SirFlyzalot @GabiNga1 @NolaCookPatriot @Rammie24 @bdonesem @LauraMi25356713 @1NJConservative @JanetTX_Blessed @Tex_2A @5dme81 @1mZerOCool @cinrui @NancyMar2025 @wildangel1968 @UnsinkableDolly @skipmav @IndyBeginsAt220 @FM_NoAlgos @DawgRight @mgtexp @jake22_h @Primrose771646 @WONDERTIME5 @nanahendrix66 @RighterThanRigh @Spooks @Imcg_2 @ken_kmak8542 @firebelly_flame @pmakze @1Cmacman @bp_dare @PilgrimsPatriot @chickenballs270 @Coastie69ers @RoyaleAuto @Just_Carly_ @JimmyLemons15 @SFG1776 @JohnSleeper51 @cg59runner @gswit11156 @Todd4USA

    95656102.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Dip buy today? $MU 915 support https://t.co/fMmPxz41Dp

    114513124K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#prayhard

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 282 interactions against 331K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.8K times each, and 10.3% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.832% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 916 interactions, about 3.2x its own typical post.

What is Tim Lawrence's engagement rate on X?
Tim Lawrence (@TJLakers01) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 330,634 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, Tim Lawrence sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TJLakers01 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TJLakers01 post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going