Back to @TFLN's profile

Texts From Last Night engagement report

@TFLN - 2.7M followers on X

Measured over 397 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 2.7M followers
Per impression
0.009%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
0.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
22.1/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 397 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.009% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.413% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 22.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 397 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105K interactions, about 104963x its own typical post.

Measured over 397 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Texts From Last Night's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 1% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Texts From Last Night sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link98% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 98% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 154 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 2026104963x their median

    Guys, if we all have TSA precheck, then none of us have TSA precheck

    100K3.6K5847769.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026100272x their median

    Gen Alpha has already started roasting Gen Z. πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚ https://t.co/waJtFJywBe

    90K6.3K1.6K2.4K19M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202690629x their median

    Taylor Swift stuns for her new single β€˜Patient Zero.’ https://t.co/iUE6IFdII6

    78K9.1K7922.9K7.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202630787x their median

    we kindly request you not to panic … BUT https://t.co/hw99YjSsMl

    29K8982304021.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202622545x their median

    An Amazon customer in Texas was not enthused when her first drone-delivered order was dropped into her swimming pool. After hearing the loud buzzing of the drone arriving, she ran outside to record the delivery, and to her surprise, it landed in her pool. https://t.co/6TIcrJIVAR

    18K2.2K1.3K1.4K11M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202619182x their median

    🚨 Los Angeles has now banned the use of AI in public schools. https://t.co/UJtJo1EuSG

    17K1.5K862092.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202615283x their median

    whose kid is this https://t.co/1EEOj6NDCB

    14K64512572443K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202613339x their median

    Kristina Sexton will serve as the intimacy coordinator for 'Godzilla x Kong: Supernova'. The previous Monsterverse films did not utilize an intimacy coordinator. (via: https://t.co/kxcKSaghbZ) https://t.co/jWnNXkme91

    10.0K6638891.8K2.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268723x their median

    SHARKY WATERS 🦈: Waters off the coast of North Carolina were teeming with sharks on Saturday, after drone video captured what appears to be hundreds of sharks in shallow waters near the beach. https://t.co/NyNNufIP5G

    7.7K6092281911.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20267531x their median

    BREAKING: Galway Metals Inc. shares surge, now up +65.91% in the past month. https://t.co/RrTzzm3h1P

    6.0K3726655344.9M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 397 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.009% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.413% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 22.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 397 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105K interactions, about 104963x its own typical post.

What is Texts From Last Night's engagement rate on X?
Texts From Last Night (@TFLN) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 397 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,688,913 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Texts From Last Night sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TFLN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TFLN post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 22.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going