PlayerSells
Back to @TFLN's profile

Texts From Last Night engagement report

@TFLN - 2.7M followers on X

Measured over 94 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 2.7M followers
Per impression
0.016%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
0.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.07/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 94 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.016% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.465% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 94 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105K interactions, about 52740x its own typical post.

Measured over 94 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Texts From Last Night's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 1% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Texts From Last Night sits below the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.006%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.319%
p902.64%
p99357.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,789 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 446,562 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.319%
90th percentile2.64%
99th percentile357.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link95% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 16, 202652740x their median

    Guys, if we all have TSA precheck, then none of us have TSA precheck

    101K3.6K5967739.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202648356x their median

    Gen Alpha has already started roasting Gen Z. 😂😂😂😂😂 https://t.co/waJtFJywBe

    87K6.1K1.6K2.3K17M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202615394x their median

    we kindly request you not to panic … BUT https://t.co/hw99YjSsMl

    29K8982304021.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202610138x their median

    An Amazon customer in Texas was not enthused when her first drone-delivered order was dropped into her swimming pool. After hearing the loud buzzing of the drone arriving, she ran outside to record the delivery, and to her surprise, it landed in her pool. https://t.co/6TIcrJIVAR

    16K1.9K1.2K1.3K7.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264362x their median

    SHARKY WATERS 🦈: Waters off the coast of North Carolina were teeming with sharks on Saturday, after drone video captured what appears to be hundreds of sharks in shallow waters near the beach. https://t.co/NyNNufIP5G

    7.7K6092281911.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202611x their median

    What do dreams about your partner cheating mean, according to psychology? https://t.co/wRsUzckBEw https://t.co/lnTorMrXOZ

    2200012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202610x their median

    17 signs your partner loves you but isn't in love with you anymore https://t.co/EI67D48iYm https://t.co/DWo4cse9U8

    2000014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.5x their median

    Gen Z carries 6 stresses at 22 that Boomers didn't face until 40 https://t.co/Ea3nqjMJrf https://t.co/l8sOxpRuFL

    1400110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20266.5x their median

    40 Dumb Tweets That Are Funnier Than They Should Be https://t.co/3CKR50iwQA https://t.co/Aog5I61Nv9

    1210026K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.0x their median

    30 Funniest Tweets We Saw This Monday (August 17, 2026) https://t.co/SWVTdZxG1u https://t.co/rSKCxWCyG4

    1110018K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 2.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 94 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.016% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.465% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 94 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105K interactions, about 52740x its own typical post.

What is Texts From Last Night's engagement rate on X?
Texts From Last Night (@TFLN) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 94 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,693,950 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Texts From Last Night sits below the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TFLN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TFLN post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going