Back to @TChartSwift's profile

Taylor Swift Charts engagement report

@TChartSwift - 166K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.36%
of 166K followers
Per impression
11.1%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
12.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.221%
45 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 1.36%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 11.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Taylor Swift Charts's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.36%, Taylor Swift Charts sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.697% to 2.61%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 193 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 17, 20265.2x their median

    Billboard named “Right Where You Left Me” as the best bonus track of Taylor Swift's career. https://t.co/XufmQAWux5

    10K92899475138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20264.4x their median

    “The Life of a Showgirl” is projected to become the first female album to generate three #1 songs on the Hot 100 this decade. https://t.co/XQAPWi2EDs

    9.1K7903042161K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.2x their median

    “The Life of a Showgirl” is the FIRST female album to earn 3 #1's on Billboard Hot 100 since Taylor's own “1989” (2014). https://t.co/oyHTubqroQ

    6.4K73962967K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20263.0x their median

    “Patient Zero” debuts with 4,512,677 views in its first day on YouTube. It's one of biggest openings of the year surpassing “The Cure”, “Stupid Song” and “Hate That I Made You Love Me”. https://t.co/kO95wl9iqz

    6.2K5166249301K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20262.7x their median

    “Patient Zero” is challenging for the biggest pure sales week of the year in the US (180k), currently belonging to “I Knew It, I Knew You” (184k) after breaking the previous record held by “Opalite” (168k). https://t.co/73k4RKkGSk

    5.3K5742272168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.3x their median

    “The Fate of Ophelia” reached 1.7 billion streams before completing 1 year of release. It's Taylor biggest opening year ever and still #11 on Global Spotify. https://t.co/ZKJnVT81va

    4.6K50681644K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20262.3x their median

    “The Life of a Showgirl (feat. Sabrina Carpenter)” remains the biggest debut by a female collaboration in Spotify history, with 18.7 million streams despite new attempts. https://t.co/sqyruO7XuA

    4.6K435251551K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.0x their median

    Despite the promises, “Patient Zero” remains #1 on Global Spotify for a 4th day with 5,582,688 streams. https://t.co/7GikqsBl3K

    4.1K32219958K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.0x their median

    .@gthot20 We are opening this space for you to explain what is happening in this hot 100 update, otherwise, we will interpret it as manipulation. All of Showgirl's tracks are eligible to its current rules. There is nothing preventing the re-entry of Ophelia or tracks that have only been on the chart for 15 weeks. Ophelia experienced a resurgence of more than double the previous points and would enter directly into the Top 15, as was the case with DtMf and Daises recently. Some album tracks from other artists with far fewer chart positions charted this week, but lacked a strong presence on streaming platforms or in sales. I eagerly await a response here, by email, or even from Taylor's team, whom we have already contacted.

    3.6K58312779152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.9x their median

    Every song on folklore, Midnights, The Tortured Poets Department, The Anthology and The Life of a showgirl would debuted at #1 on Global Spotify today (3.3m). https://t.co/s1zfaxT26l

    4.1K25512353K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 166K followers, an engagement rate of 1.36%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 11.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 5.2x its own typical post.

What is Taylor Swift Charts's engagement rate on X?
Taylor Swift Charts (@TChartSwift) has an engagement rate of 1.36%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 166,331 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.36%, Taylor Swift Charts sits above the 75th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TChartSwift have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TChartSwift post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going