Back to @TCNetwork's profile

TCN engagement report

@TCNetwork - 911K followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 911K followers
Per impression
1.71%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
2.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
456
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 456 interactions against 911K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

TCN's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, TCN sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,555 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video10% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 10% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 499 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 23, 202679x their median

    This might be the most personal interview I've ever done. I talk about all of it here. Getting off social media. Getting off everything. Going back to church. What I believe I was shown, and why I'll never go near that again. Some of it I'm still not ready to talk about. Thank you, @TuckerCarlson, for having me back out there. I really enjoyed the conversation. Full episode releases on the @TCNetwork tomorrow.

    31K3.3K1.4K1691.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202673x their median

    Legend. 😢❤️🙏 https://t.co/whfw5MMRiP

    32K1.4K14264575K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 202670x their median

    Corruption, drugs and greed: Volodymyr Zelensky’s longtime press secretary on the secret world of the West’s favorite dictator. 0:00 How Did Mendel Begin Working for Zelensky? 11:29 Why Hasn’t US Media Covered Zelensky’s Scandals? 25:30 Zelensky’s Relationship With Joe Biden 32:45 Is Zelensky Himself Corrupt? 36:44 Who Does Zelensky Actually Listen To? 42:45 Zelensky’s Use of the Frontlines as Punishment 50:17 Why Hasn’t Western Media Spoken up for Ukrainians? 1:03:32 Why Do Western Countries Want the War to Continue? 1:09:16 Does Zelensky Do Coke? 1:13:04 What’s Zelensky’s Wife Like? 1:14:56 Mendel’s Experience Living Through the Ukraine War 1:18:27 Is There Any Way to Get Rid of Zelensky? 1:23:42 Why Are There So Many Americans Always in Ukraine? 1:32:35 Mendel’s Message to Putin

    22K6.7K2.2K9482.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202616x their median

    Tucker on the cancelation of @macklemore: "It's a defense of the truth... and of reason. But above all, it's a defense of the inalienable right of every person to express his conscious whether you or I like it or not." https://t.co/WUigvLUffJ

    5.8K1.2K19337131K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 202613x their median

    Tucker reads and reacts to Fauci's diary entry calling him an "asshole." We're live right now. Watch on https://t.co/czOhKmdlbW. https://t.co/GnBzs28MV3

    5.2K74612720239K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20267.9x their median

    Big things dropping today! https://t.co/ErZc2UdVQK

    5.0K45030146184K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20267.3x their median

    "Hey, who would defend a far-Left candidate with a Nazi tattoo, a deep and abiding hatred for America, and multiple rape allegations?" https://t.co/6D1fQ7cZlr

    4.5K40929915401K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20267.1x their median

    The 9/11 Commission was a cover-up. To this day, our leaders are working to keep the truth about 9/11 hidden. Last year we decided to investigate for ourselves because we believe Americans deserve better. Watch our investigative series here: https://t.co/KKZv3ARdoR

    2.5K589712574K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20265.6x their median

    The Two-Party system is a joke. Something new is coming. Americans elected Donald Trump because they thought he opposed the Uniparty. Now that the president has committed himself to serving the establishment, voters need someone new. Someone who will actually fight to save our country. Conventional wisdom suggests the people will choose a Republican or Democrat politician as their next champion. But that might not happen. Americans have rightfully grown to hate both parties so much that they may flock to an entirely new movement that is unbound by the two-party system. @ggreenwald views this possibility as highly likely. As one of the most honest journalists of this century, Greenwald has a deep understanding of how badly the system has failed regular people. He joined The Tucker Carlson Show to preview what may come after MAGA, reveal why neocons like @bariweiss love Flock cameras, discuss @AOC setting her sights on the presidency, and more. Watch the full episode here: https://t.co/1peopR8234

    2.0K4511181341K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20265.6x their median

    The Washington war machine wants you to think Iran hates America because of our freedom. The truth is far more complicated. Watch our new documentary “Operation AJAX: The True History of the Broken US-Iran Alliance” on https://t.co/kMW7QuTDuR now. https://t.co/6eusouYgAo

    2.0K4787314489K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 456 interactions against 911K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

What is TCN's engagement rate on X?
TCN (@TCNetwork) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 911,264 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, TCN sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @TCNetwork have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @TCNetwork post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going