V Philippines 🇵🇭 ʟᴀʏᴏ(ꪜ)ᴇʀ¹⁰⁰ engagement report
@TAETAE_PH - 84K followers on X
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 10.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kimtaehyung_worldtour_arirang, #v_worldtour_arirang_la_d2, #v_worldtour_arirang_la_d1.
Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #kimtaehyung_worldtour_arirang, #v_worldtour_arirang_la_d2, #v_worldtour_arirang_la_d1.
Compared with accounts its own size
V Philippines 🇵🇭 ʟᴀʏᴏ(ꪜ)ᴇʀ¹⁰⁰'s engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.131%, V Philippines 🇵🇭 ʟᴀʏᴏ(ꪜ)ᴇʀ¹⁰⁰ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 10% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 314 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 5, 202527x their median
Taehyung's nose refuses to budge. Not even the turtleneck can hide perfection. V AT CELINE FASHION SHOW TAEHYUNG TAEHYUNG #VxCelineEte26 @celineofficial #TAEHYUNGxCELINE https://t.co/TyarOVM4Wf
- Sep 2, 202615x their median
We’ve been thinking about how to approach this since yesterday. We wanted to speak up only after we had enough time to process what happened, because we don’t want our words to come across as impulsive or based on incomplete information. What happened was disappointing on several levels. First, what that fanbase did was deeply unbecoming of a large fanbase with such a big platform. Before putting out a serious accusation, especially one involving an artist, the bare minimum should be to check the facts and make sure the information being shared is actually true. Second, this was not just a harmless misunderstanding. A false narrative was quickly amplified, redirecting attention from what should have been a happy concert night and creating unnecessary hate and accusations toward people who had nothing to do with it. What makes this even more disappointing is where this accusation came from and how quickly it was believed. The original claim came from a vile shipper account that has openly shown hostility toward 🐯 and has repeatedly spread malicious claims about him. Instead of treating such a serious accusation with caution and verifying it independently, the claim was immediately taken at face value and amplified to thousands of people. And when people started correcting the information, JmPopbase (@/jmpopbase) was quick to hide comments on their original post. Instead of taking those corrections as an opportunity to stop, review the footage, and fact-check what had been reported to them, the corrections were hidden while the accusation continued to circulate. This is exactly why fact-checking matters. The footage and timeline show that the phone was already there before Jimin reached that part of the stage. This could have been easily verified before accusing an entire group of fans—and more importantly, before allowing 🐯’s name to be dragged into it. To everyone who was quick to believe the accusation and spread it further, we urge you to stop. Please do your own fact-checking before joining a hate train. Do not let someone else's existing agenda against 🐯 become your reason to believe and spread an unverified accusation. If you see accounts continuing to spread this false claim or deliberately using it to attack 🐯, please report them instead of giving them more engagement. We hope this is an eye-opener for everyone. It is incredibly easy to jump on a hate bandwagon when 🐯 is the target, yet somehow so difficult to speak up when he is the one being unfairly targeted. We are speaking now because this has clearly gone beyond a simple misunderstanding. The end goal of these accounts is to damage 🐯’s name, create hate toward him, and push a narrative that was never true to begin with. We will not stand by and watch that happen. We are not asking anyone to blindly take our word for it. Watch the footage. Check the timeline. Look at the facts for yourself. But once the truth is clear, please have enough integrity to stop spreading a lie. Do not drag 🐯 into something he had nothing to do with. And to the people who are so quick to believe every accusation against him: maybe it’s time to ask yourselves why you are always so willing to believe the worst about one member without even checking the facts first. Do not drag 🐯 into something he had nothing to do with. Do not use misinformation to manufacture hate against him. And do not expect us to stay silent while his name is being deliberately dragged. We can call out irresponsible behavior without being impulsive. We can defend 🐯 without attacking anyone who does not deserve it. But make no mistake: we are not pushovers, and we will not allow 🐯 to be used as a scapegoat for someone else’s narrative.
- Sep 2, 20263.1x their median
It’s not just a single ad—it’s an entire street lined with Kim Taehyung’s face on the way to SoFi Stadium. TIRTIR is seriously outdoing themselves with this one. TIRTIR AMBASSADOR TAEHYUNG V FACE OF TIRTIR #TaehyungxTIRTIR #VxTIRTIRGLOBAL https://t.co/ohEzdscmKD
- Sep 2, 20262.2x their median
Awww, our pure angel Taehyung really put Jungkook in the center. Birthday boy privilege! V SHINES IN CITY OF ANGELS STAGE SENSATION TAEHYUNG #V_WORLDTOUR_ARIRANG_LA_D1 #KIMTAEHYUNG_WORLDTOUR_ARIRANG https://t.co/cbbQnKSJwB
- Sep 2, 20262.0x their median
Taehyung [thv] IG update 20260902 "ARMYs, I’m sorry, but there are no recent updates on my life." - Taehyung A life update from Taehyung: no life updates. We’ll take it. 🔗 https://t.co/liMiXtqJwn https://t.co/GyfKg9qOQp
- Sep 2, 20261.7x their median
A full look at TIRTIR’s Flagship Store in Seongsu, Seoul, featuring Taehyung’s new campaign visuals on its facade. (ctto) TIRTIR AMBASSADOR TAEHYUNG V FACE OF TIRTIR #TaehyungxTIRTIR #VxTIRTIRGLOBAL https://t.co/1GCwoRBpYH
- Sep 2, 20261.6x their median
When you know the choreo by heart you can dance it anyway you like. Taehyung cutie~ https://t.co/EmJTMqrKre
- Sep 2, 2026
Boy in Luv got Taehyung all hyped up V SHINES IN CITY OF ANGELS STAGE SENSATION TAEHYUNG #V_WORLDTOUR_ARIRANG_LA_D1 #KIMTAEHYUNG_WORLDTOUR_ARIRANG https://t.co/mVwS094akg
- Sep 3, 2026
Taehyung wants to know! Which Jinro flavor is your favorite? If Taehyung is asking, we better have an answer. JINRO GLOBAL AMBASSADOR V KIM TAEHYUNG FOR JINRO #TAEHYUNGxJINRO #VxJINRO https://t.co/xg8awCXZdZ
- Sep 2, 2026
Concert isn't complete withour our Butter Trio! V SHINES IN CITY OF ANGELS STAGE SENSATION TAEHYUNG #V_WORLDTOUR_ARIRANG_LA_D1 #KIMTAEHYUNG_WORLDTOUR_ARIRANG https://t.co/dK2N4NGWpI
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 110 interactions against 84K followers, an engagement rate of 0.131%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.0K times each, and 10.7% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #kimtaehyung_worldtour_arirang, #v_worldtour_arirang_la_d2, #v_worldtour_arirang_la_d1.
- What is V Philippines 🇵🇭 ʟᴀʏᴏ(ꪜ)ᴇʀ¹⁰⁰'s engagement rate on X?
- V Philippines 🇵🇭 ʟᴀʏᴏ(ꪜ)ᴇʀ¹⁰⁰ (@TAETAE_PH) has an engagement rate of 0.131%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 84,050 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.131%, V Philippines 🇵🇭 ʟᴀʏᴏ(ꪜ)ᴇʀ¹⁰⁰ sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @TAETAE_PH have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @TAETAE_PH post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.