Back to @Szymansk_ii's profile

Szymanski engagement report

@Szymansk_ii - 130K followers on X

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.118%
of 130K followers
Per impression
1.55%
10.0K views on a typical post
Reach
7.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
154
interactions (median)
Saved
0.04%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 154 interactions against 130K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10.0K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 933 interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 46 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Szymanski's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 54% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.118%, Szymanski sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video76% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 76% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 139 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 20266.1x their median

    How to join the UNICORN community on mepass & earn more https://t.co/VROsrFlW5f

    72611090783K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20263.2x their median

    We are close https://t.co/MKe3Ip4tde

    3963558412K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.7x their median

    City needs to leave the premier League, they need to take a plea deal to avoid all this escalating even further https://t.co/xiX0LttFz0

    3713513012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.6x their median

    If you don't have the least 15million naira in your account right now, you have no business sleeping till this hour

    2911893618K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.6x their median

    It’s high time the NFF stop this selfish corrupt practices and fix our cultural football heritage. https://t.co/IJtS00IyOJ

    3293927218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.5x their median

    The Anini of web3 has resurrected & his ready to Rug pull what’s left of his project. Sad times https://t.co/0k70T9uwBK

    3193032423K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.4x their median

    My GOAT. Till the end of times over & Over again 😔 https://t.co/1EDnXyH0Lk

    306292909.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.2x their median

    Arsenal is currently 1st in the Premier League Table right now after mancheaters are being exposed https://t.co/LlBsV5uYs7

    2853425112K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.1x their median

    🚨The wait is over. After completing all reviews and the last verification checks, the Sible Network Android app is now live on Google Play. Android users can hop into Sible directly from the app and keep participating in the ecosystem from their phones. Huge thanks to everyone who stayed loyal through the Web App stage and waited patiently for the Android launch. This is a big step forward for Sible Network and there is so much more ahead. iOS is next.

    2532946218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.1x their median

    Be like say na to enter politics go be my next move https://t.co/7Et6JMQVPE

    2622140418K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 154 interactions against 130K followers, an engagement rate of 0.118%. Measured over 46 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10.0K times each, and 1.55% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.63% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 46 posts sampled, 76% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 933 interactions, about 6.1x its own typical post.

What is Szymanski's engagement rate on X?
Szymanski (@Szymansk_ii) has an engagement rate of 0.118%, based on the median interactions across 46 original posts from the last 30 days against 130,443 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.118%, Szymanski sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Szymansk_ii have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Szymansk_ii post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going