Back to @SvDDebatt's profile

SvD Debatt engagement report

@SvDDebatt - 134K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 134K followers
Per impression
0.141%
2.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265 interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SvD Debatt's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 8% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, SvD Debatt sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 230 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 202666x their median

    Vid varje val sedan 20 år har jag själv sett och hört berättelser om hur valarbetare i Järva på olika sätt har betett sig olämpligt. Det skriver L-politikern Åsa Nilsson Söderström. https://t.co/983UQ7ptNn

    188686313K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202644x their median

    Det finns en fråga som glöms bort i diskussionen om regeringsunderlag och ministerposter: Sveriges ställning som säkerhetspolitisk partner. Det skriver Harald Sandberg, tidigare ambassadör och UD-tjänsteman. https://t.co/w4ASe75mth

    12838548.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202629x their median

    Den som vill lagstifta för Sverige måste först tåla att vändas ut och in. Idag ställs högre säkerhets­krav på en lokal­vårdare hos Försvars­makten än på en riksdags­ledamot, skriver Gustav Thenander, vd för ett säkerhets­företag. https://t.co/Ovsr8va9Qd

    90221211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20269.0x their median

    Synen på det som benämns ”psykisk ohälsa” har skapat ett gränsland där normalt mänskligt lidande riskerar att betraktas som sjukdom. Unga måste rustas för livet, inte förskonas från det, skriver debattörer. https://t.co/htNBAbY4bh

    249219.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20268.8x their median

    Majoriteten av alla forskningsartiklar riskerar att inte fylla någon funktion ens när de skrivs – på grund av AI. Frågan är hur detta faktum skall hanteras inom den högre utbildningen, skriver professor Ulf Danielsson. https://t.co/1rVGKTDZzH

    266124.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20268.8x their median

    I utsatta områden finns väljare som delar flera av Tidöpartiernas politiska ståndpunkter. Men möjligheten att vinna deras förtroende undergrävs när de misstänkliggörs för hur de röstar, skriver Ahmed Abdirahman. https://t.co/rRJXbGrXGb

    229403.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.8x their median

    Bränslekrisen närmar sig Sverige. Regeringen måste agera innan priset vid svenska pumpar visar 25, 28 eller 32 kronor litern. Det skriver Peder Blohm Bokenhielm, grundare av Bränsleupproret. https://t.co/hpXpY4OhLt

    132714.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.5x their median

    På grund av Tidöpartiernas politik ser samhälls­utmaningarna helt annorlunda ut nu än 2022. Därför finns möjligheter att bygga ett gemensamt politiskt projekt bland partierna i mitten, skriver Matilda Molander och Eric Luth. https://t.co/aaobPW4sXB

    6112310K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.5x their median

    PRO vill avskaffa pensions­gruppens konsensuskrav så att en majoritet kan höja pensionerna. I en åldrande väljar­kår blir det en ordning där de äldre röstar sig till de ungas pengar, skriver Rutger Brattström, Timbro. https://t.co/0N8ZDCqw1l

    101304.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20262.5x their median

    Den som mår för dåligt för att klara sig själv, men inte tillräckligt dåligt för psykiatrin, står idag utan självklar kontakt. Hårdast drabbas den som saknar nätverk eller resurser, skriver debattörer från Stiftelsen 1825 i en replik. https://t.co/xaVy1qTgt5

    72103.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 134K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.5K times each, and 0.141% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.85% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265 interactions, about 66x its own typical post.

What is SvD Debatt's engagement rate on X?
SvD Debatt (@SvDDebatt) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 134,302 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, SvD Debatt sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SvDDebatt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SvDDebatt post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going