Back to @Surfer's profile

SURFER engagement report

@Surfer - 261K followers on X

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.008%
of 261K followers
Per impression
0.611%
3.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21
interactions (median)
Saved
0.029%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 0.611% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99 interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SURFER's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, SURFER sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,175 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 20264.7x their median

    In 1906, Thomas Edison’s team filmed Waikiki surfers at Canoes, unintentionally launching more than a century of surf movies and clips to follow. https://t.co/vx0gOSP5AX

    8316003.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.3x their median

    The recently released tome, "Nalu," pays homage to the Hawaiians and offers a reflection on surfing’s roots vis-à-vis today. https://t.co/uIA1q869yE

    5313124.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.0x their median

    Ben Gravy scores a ferry wake so flawless it looks more like Kelly Slater’s wave pool than open water. https://t.co/O7GNsPmBus

    565307.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.5x their median

    From a fatal car crash he narrowly avoided to a live shark attack and the loss of three brothers, Mick Fanning reveals what it took to keep going. https://t.co/D9BjqDv0Me

    457017.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.5x their median

    The hurricane will stay well offshore, but its swell could make for some of the biggest surf of the summer, with the best waves focused on south-facing beaches. https://t.co/9YHcIqFSOG

    408226.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.4x their median

    Santa Cruz OG Ken "Skindog" Collins on why the most people miss the point when they complain about not getting waves. If you want to up your wave count, you need to hear this. Read more here: https://t.co/9wATCYCFUi https://t.co/fqAJtCzu77

    423415.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.3x their median

    Hurricane Marie 2.0 sends colossal surf straight into Long Beach, overrunning emergency sand berms and pushing seawater deep into coastal neighborhoods. https://t.co/D6zJubC7rm

    3512205.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.1x their median

    California’s highest tides of the year will hit as El Niño lifts sea levels and swell pounds the coast. Here are the key dates and why they matter. https://t.co/PHsHzUzOGr

    349115.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.1x their median

    A 63-year-old swimmer is killed off Sorrento Beach and WA responds with its first catch-and-kill order for a great white in about a decade, igniting debate. https://t.co/1ykisHQw0J

    3245411K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.1x their median

    Eight surfers, one perfect window: We're officially on stand-by for what could be one of the best barrel showdowns of the year. https://t.co/fGvzQulIA4

    386013.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 0.611% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99 interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

What is SURFER's engagement rate on X?
SURFER (@Surfer) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 260,542 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, SURFER sits above the 10th percentile of the 202,175 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Surfer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Surfer post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going