Back to @SuperChampsHQ's profile

Super Champs engagement report

@SuperChampsHQ - 311K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 311K followers
Per impression
0.444%
4.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
21
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 311K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.444% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Super Champs's engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Super Champs sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 151 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 18, 20263.7x their median

    Need to move your $CHAMP? Seamless cross-chain bridging is LIVE. 🔥 Bridge from Base to ETH directly via the Super Champs HQ site, powered by @wormhole ⚡️ Get your $CHAMP where you need them. 🛡️ https://t.co/Jg97OH0Ucx

    36366012K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20262.2x their median

    We're pausing on new seasons of the mobile games while we build what's next for the Super Champs universe. The space has shifted, and we are moving with it. Racket Rampage and Bullet League will be unpublished on August 17. The SC lore and the characters are all coming with us into the next chapter. Stay tuned for more!

    317908.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Weekend sparring matches are a thing with the Super Champs 🏆️ https://t.co/LfZsHOsX9N

    184515.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026

    📣 Magic Shroopies generation from staking will end on 31 July. Any Shroopies you’ve already earned can be used for ecosystem rewards in the future. Stay tuned for more details. https://t.co/wrh00Iwlp0

    212504.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Touchdown! Ready to see what makes a Super Champ? https://t.co/mfndu4SLU3

    202414.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    Have you ever wondered how a student enrolls in the prestigious Super Champs Academy? Check this space to learn more about Lupey's story as he begins his journey to becoming a Super Champ 🏆 https://t.co/SKicj7zYHX

    213304.2K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 2026

    Throwback to the Starting Six of the Racketsports Team. Who’s your fav? 😍 https://t.co/gtbwmhLctm

    222113.4K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 2026

    Class is in session! 🏫 https://t.co/NhyFHdh7bI

    202213.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 2026

    The Super Champs Academy is always bustling with high energy and eager students to become superstars 🤩 https://t.co/YjweZv9Wfx

    193212.1K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 2026

    Just another training session for our Super Champs 🏋️ https://t.co/7QPEZx84y6

    163311.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 21 interactions against 311K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.7K times each, and 0.444% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is Super Champs's engagement rate on X?
Super Champs (@SuperChampsHQ) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 310,553 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Super Champs sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SuperChampsHQ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SuperChampsHQ post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going