Super 70s Sports engagement report
@Super70sSports - 791K followers on X
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 791K followers, an engagement rate of 0.507%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 4.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 49 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Super 70s Sports's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.507%, Super 70s Sports sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 94% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 137 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 20263.4x their median
That time the Redskins won the Super Bowl and President Reagan just fired a fucking dart that hit Ricky Sanders in stride. ‘Merica, motherfucker. https://t.co/HeMScVnmYP
- Aug 29, 20263.1x their median
Dennis Hopper explaining to Francis Ford Coppola on the set of Apocalypse Now that he’s too fucking baked to remember his lines may be the most Dennis Hopper thing ever. https://t.co/FQbHCJE2Sc
- Aug 29, 20263.0x their median
Remnants of a better world … https://t.co/fJbjmdS3p3
- Sep 7, 20262.2x their median
Nothing said “September” when I was a kid quite like an NFL game played on a baseball diamond. https://t.co/lIT6jv9k98
- Sep 9, 20262.1x their median
You may see something better today than Willie Nelson drinking a beer while hanging out with Earl Campbell, although I highly fucking doubt it. https://t.co/CVFiRlc6Ss
- Aug 27, 20262.1x their median
Baseball desperately needs more managers kicking the ever-loving shit out of mascots. There is no effective counterargument for this. https://t.co/z7PB2Gyj0R
- Sep 7, 20261.9x their median
I know some of you remember this banger … https://t.co/RLk8uvghUW
- Aug 22, 20261.8x their median
There’s nothing better on a hot summer day than downing some mediocre ice cream with a spoon that tastes like a park bench. https://t.co/NcKzEKnza5
- Sep 8, 20261.6x their median
If you’re over 50 years of age and have never gone “dun-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh” I don’t even fucking know you anymore. https://t.co/6B7d8emqjv
- Sep 25, 20261.5x their median
The Sloppy Joe is underrated as fuck. Should be much more widely available. Can I get a witness? https://t.co/RMSq2rlR0O
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4.0K interactions against 791K followers, an engagement rate of 0.507%. Measured over 49 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 99K times each, and 4.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 49 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 3.4x its own typical post.
- What is Super 70s Sports's engagement rate on X?
- Super 70s Sports (@Super70sSports) has an engagement rate of 0.507%, based on the median interactions across 49 original posts from the last 30 days against 791,174 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.507%, Super 70s Sports sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Super70sSports have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Super70sSports post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.83 posts per day across the measured window.