Back to @Super70sSports's profile

Super 70s Sports engagement report

@Super70sSports - 791K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.403%
of 791K followers
Per impression
3.27%
98K views on a typical post
Reach
12.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
44 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.27/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 791K followers, an engagement rate of 0.403%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 3.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Super 70s Sports's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.403%, Super 70s Sports sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 20263.8x their median

    Dennis Hopper explaining to Francis Ford Coppola on the set of Apocalypse Now that he’s too fucking baked to remember his lines may be the most Dennis Hopper thing ever. https://t.co/FQbHCJE2Sc

    11K1.1K12876913K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.7x their median

    Remnants of a better world … https://t.co/fJbjmdS3p3

    11K59227170150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.6x their median

    Baseball desperately needs more managers kicking the ever-loving shit out of mascots. There is no effective counterargument for this. https://t.co/z7PB2Gyj0R

    7.4K61320686662K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.2x their median

    There’s nothing better on a hot summer day than downing some mediocre ice cream with a spoon that tastes like a park bench. https://t.co/NcKzEKnza5

    6.4K37116460156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.8x their median

    You cannot possibly begin to understand what a major life event going here was in the 80s unless you were there … https://t.co/UASBQRQ1P4

    5.4K2471345196K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.8x their median

    The exact moment puberty began for an entire generation. https://t.co/6GyENpMP91

    5.6K11812625173K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20261.8x their median

    Hey, I’ve got an idea, let’s all watch the 1985 Bears defense destroy the NFL for a few minutes. https://t.co/F5E2N0Lhjy

    5.0K49117945198K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.7x their median

    Seat belts? Never. But two drops of rain and Susan had the kids decked out like the fucking Gorton’s fisherman. https://t.co/ttGEoWDdQg

    5.1K251541699K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.6x their median

    What did Walter Payton do when he had the flu and a 101-degree temperature? He ran for 275 yards because he was Walter Payton is what he did. https://t.co/pLzgp3DsTu

    4.5K44110324126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    1979 just called and said your mom used to be hot. https://t.co/jj2ffWFgWQ

    4.5K1051216150K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.2K interactions against 791K followers, an engagement rate of 0.403%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 3.27% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post.

What is Super 70s Sports's engagement rate on X?
Super 70s Sports (@Super70sSports) has an engagement rate of 0.403%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 790,990 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.403%, Super 70s Sports sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Super70sSports have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Super70sSports post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going