StrangeDaysTech engagement report
@StrangeDaysTech - 165K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 872 interactions, about 218x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, StrangeDaysTech sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.3% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 299 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 28, 2026218x their median
Un modelo estadístico elaborado por el matemático y actuario Arturo Erdély plantea que una eventual reposición del examen podría realizarse de manera focalizada: bastaría convocar a quienes obtuvieron 106 aciertos o más, un grupo integrado por 2 mil 818 aspirantes, equivalente al 20.6% del total de sustentantes para Médico Cirujano en Ciudad Universitaria. #ExcélsiorDigital #México #UNAM
- Jul 25, 2026
El contrato exigía notario público para cargar los reactivos y un supervisor por cada 150 pantallas durante la aplicación. Toda la seguridad estaba puesta en el activo equivocado. Nuestra opinión sobre resultados del examen de admisión de la #UNAM . https://t.co/8hhBjL7ib7
- Sep 16, 2026
📚 «Justicia para adolescentes. Responsabilidad solidaria del Estado de reparar a las víctimas», de Michelle Guerra (IIJ-UNAM, 2026). Apuesta por un sistema garantista que no busque castigar sino prevenir el delito y atender las causas estructurales en las que se sostiene. 👇 https://t.co/8vMaTqQ0Ns
- Jun 5, 2026
Esta cuenta fue, hace años, la alerta sísmica en tu bolsillo: la primera app móvil que replicó la alerta del Valle de México. Sirvió a decenas de miles de personas. Hoy ya no alerta sismos — y queremos contarte por qué, y qué sigue... 🧵
- Aug 5, 2026
Miles de pruebas en verde y un método que ninguna de las ocho pantallas de la aplicación llamaba. Cada pieza funcionaba; el recorrido completo, no. Así trabaja una auditoría adversarial multi-agente con StrayMark. https://t.co/UyrBCrAO3Z
- Jun 6, 2026
4,712 votos en una encuesta del Fediverso: 75.6% dice que la genAI hizo su vida peor. ¿Sesgo de muestra? Seguro. Pero Stack Overflow mide adopción récord con confianza en mínimos, y METR demostró que ni los propios usuarios saben si la IA los acelera...
- Jun 30, 2026
El debate sobre si la IA atrofia a los programadores se quedó en el diagnóstico equivocado. No es atrofia. Es desfase de velocidades: la máquina corre y no tenemos el mapa para seguirle el paso. Nuestro fundador desarrolló la respuesta completa en tres ensayos 🧵👇
- Jul 29, 2026
El discurso de Anthropic para ocultar su pánico a la libre competencia, invoca el viejo miedo al "peligro amarillo" de la guerra fría. Sus entrevistas de trabajo tendrán como primera pregunta, leída en tono agresivo: "Usted conoce o a leído alguna vez a Carlos Marx???"
- Jun 18, 2026
Google publicó un estándar abierto para el conocimiento que usa la IA, y validó sin saberlo una apuesta nuestra de meses.Pero la pregunta de fondo no es técnica: ¿para quién es ese conocimiento? ¿Para que la máquina trabaje sola, o para que tu equipo siga al mando?
- Jul 26, 2026
Otra gran pregunta que vale la pena explorar es, si gracias a los datos que proporciona la UNAM se pudo descubrir este enorme problema, ¿qué ha ocurrido con los exámenes de admisión de la UAM, IPN y CENEVAL? https://t.co/8hhBjL7ib7
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 165K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.222% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.09% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 872 interactions, about 218x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is StrangeDaysTech's engagement rate on X?
- StrangeDaysTech (@StrangeDaysTech) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 165,395 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, StrangeDaysTech sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,515 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @StrangeDaysTech have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @StrangeDaysTech post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.