Back to @StockMarketNerd's profile

Brad Freeman engagement report

@StockMarketNerd - 201K followers on X

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.084%
of 201K followers
Per impression
0.767%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
10.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
168
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.7/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.767% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Brad Freeman's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.084%, Brad Freeman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video52% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 52% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 270 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202610x their median

    Thank you Mr. Altman for making Dots available only on Pro while Muse stays free across $META massive consumer base. That gives Meta a massive head start because agents get stickier as they learn more about you & every month Muse builds those habits makes it harder to replace. https://t.co/T0aZ245fpv

    1.5K889322211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202610x their median

    $ORCL Chairman Larry Ellison just canceled a planned $7.5B stock sale without selling a single share. Thats a pretty smart move with Oracle entering one of the most capital intensive buildout periods in its history. https://t.co/GhblZd1dbc

    1.5K1338250220K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20268.5x their median

    $SBUX is reportedly exploring a takeover of $CMG in a deal that could create a combined company with ~$50B in annual sales. Wild that Brian Niccol left Chipotle to run Starbucks and could now end up buying the company he used to lead. https://t.co/xVmFmv23wN

    1.2K849943168K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.1x their median

    $GOOGL co-founder Sergey Brin is taking a bigger role in Gemini pushing teams to move faster, cut bureaucracy & lean harder into recursive self-improvement. It’s starting to really look like Gemini 4 is becoming Google’s big test of whether AI can start improving itself faster. https://t.co/E3iGx0VfiC

    1.1K66429145K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.4x their median

    Dario is worried that Anthropic models have a chance of killing humanity in the future, but he won’t slow down unless he can preserve “commercial competitiveness” by forcing others who are behind him to slow down as well. Am I getting that right?

    9564167651K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.6x their median

    McDonald's $MCD falls to lowest price in more than 2 years 📉 📉 https://t.co/ZVBJpHK2ga

    80360542194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.3x their median

    I still say no rate hike. Sticking with that point of view. We shall see.

    4561486335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20262.3x their median

    $META has: 1) a deeply profitable business 2) an investment grade credit rating 3) a business that would work just fine if open source models kept gaining steam. OpenAI & Anthropic have none of those things. So? Meta says speed up model innovation. And? Those two say slow down. Speculation. But I think rational speculation.

    3451924330K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20262.2x their median

    $NU & $MELI investors over the last few months: https://t.co/TRUCPPQnUc

    341716523K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20262.1x their median

    Good news for Brazil-exposed names like $NU, $SE, $MELI and many others. Bolsonaro with the first-round victory in Brazil. Performed much better than polls indicated. General consensus is that he’s the more business-friendly candidate. https://t.co/NSbci59KNV

    322815659K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.767% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 52% carry an image or video and 21% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

What is Brad Freeman's engagement rate on X?
Brad Freeman (@StockMarketNerd) has an engagement rate of 0.084%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 200,884 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.084%, Brad Freeman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @StockMarketNerd have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @StockMarketNerd post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going