Back to @StillADog's profile

A DOG~ engagement report

@StillADog - 46K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.017%
of 46K followers
Per impression
3.38%
237 views on a typical post
Reach
0.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 237 times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 1990x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #peacetalks, #putin, #russiaukrainewar.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #peacetalks, #putin, #russiaukrainewar.

Compared with accounts its own size

A DOG~'s engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, A DOG~ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 48 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 27, 20211990x their median

    Oh. My. God. He ate a fly! https://t.co/SFBfkWzxA8

    11K2.1K1.9K1.4KView on X
  • May 5, 202680x their median

    Rape and child abuse are no trivial matter!⛔️ I will keep repeating this until even the slowest and most foolish among us have finally got the message!!!☝️⚠️ The fact that behind the scenes a possible pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell and other human traffickers and rapists is being considered should set alarm bells ringing for any serious American who is committed to the highest ethical standards and possesses at least a mminimum of decency and compassion! This is an absolute scandal, a social disease, and will open the floodgates to child abusers, rapists and human traffickers, as they will have no legal consequences to fear. Those involved in negotiating such unacceptable deals – and who are even publicly calling for a pardon – pose a real danger to children, women, the public and the rule of law. Most of those involved realise that their unethical actions could destroy their future, and are therefore trying to negotiate deals behind the scenes to protect themselves from the consequences. There is no excuse for such behaviour. No exceptions must be made, and the law must be enforced to the full. The Epstein files must be published in their original form, without being tampered with beforehand to protect criminal child abusers. After all, this concerns children and women who are under our protection and who have had to endure unimaginable suffering. There must be no confusion between victim and perpetrator, and any form of sexual violence or coercion against vulnerable individuals must be severely punished. This is no trivial matter, but a capital offence!!! It does not matter who committed these heinous crimes, whether they are rich or poor, politicians or ordinary citizens. It is completely irrelevant which party – Republican or Democrat – the people on the list belong to. As I said, it does not matter who committed these crimes, whether they are rich or poor, politicians or ordinary citizens. Anyone on this list who is proven to have committed a crime must be punished without question, regardless of party affiliation or social status. There are no vague boundaries here… only clear lines that have been shamelessly crossed out of selfishness, base instincts or for one’s own pleasure. Since no compassion was shown to the victims, why should the public feel compassion for the perpetrators!!! That would be a capitulation to the rule of law, society and one’s own conscience, and is absolutely unacceptable. Everyone should ask themselves what it would be like if it were their own child or wife who had to endure such torment. Shame on all those who in any way trivialise such acts, look the other way or, worse still, blame the victims. The perpetrators belong in prison and should serve their sentences in full. Full stop!!!!🚫 Publish the complete, unredacted Epstein files without tampering with them first. ☝️⚠️ Thank you very much for your attention to this matter! #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #ReleaseTheFiles #JusticeForSurvivors #EpsteinSurvivors #BelieveSurvivors

    3382444513459K viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 202624x their median

    Accidental Truth https://t.co/5f1oT5vHDe

    11857142865 viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20264.0x their median

    Same God the MAGAts knee too https://t.co/A4ELIf447O

    22730367 viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20262.5x their median

    No Shit. Does Trump realize that the country can’t use bankruptcy to run from its Debt. https://t.co/ZGP3Ya5VvI

    14510298 viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20262.1x their median

    Dementia Boy will lose even when he cheats https://t.co/EHcRorflw4

    9710295 viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 20261.8x their median

    https://t.co/sEutNu1Aek

    1130079 viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 2026

    Raising Cost of Living and Inequality. Aims familiar https://t.co/uMcF2376tk

    9100278 viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 2026

    Beer-throwing Trump staffer filmed getting tossed out of NBA game: report https://t.co/1Sw7GXTEZw

    8101534 viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 2026

    🎈 https://t.co/kWyDD7YB8c

    6210237 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#peacetalks#putin#russiaukrainewar#trump#trumpisarussianagent

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 237 times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 1990x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #peacetalks, #putin, #russiaukrainewar.

What is A DOG~'s engagement rate on X?
A DOG~ (@StillADog) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 46,483 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, A DOG~ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @StillADog have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @StillADog post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going