A DOG~ engagement report
@StillADog - 46K followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 237 times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 1990x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #peacetalks, #putin, #russiaukrainewar.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #peacetalks, #putin, #russiaukrainewar.
Compared with accounts its own size
A DOG~'s engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.017%, A DOG~ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 79% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 21% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 48 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- May 27, 20211990x their median
Oh. My. God. He ate a fly! https://t.co/SFBfkWzxA8
- May 5, 202680x their median
Rape and child abuse are no trivial matter!⛔️ I will keep repeating this until even the slowest and most foolish among us have finally got the message!!!☝️⚠️ The fact that behind the scenes a possible pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell and other human traffickers and rapists is being considered should set alarm bells ringing for any serious American who is committed to the highest ethical standards and possesses at least a mminimum of decency and compassion! This is an absolute scandal, a social disease, and will open the floodgates to child abusers, rapists and human traffickers, as they will have no legal consequences to fear. Those involved in negotiating such unacceptable deals – and who are even publicly calling for a pardon – pose a real danger to children, women, the public and the rule of law. Most of those involved realise that their unethical actions could destroy their future, and are therefore trying to negotiate deals behind the scenes to protect themselves from the consequences. There is no excuse for such behaviour. No exceptions must be made, and the law must be enforced to the full. The Epstein files must be published in their original form, without being tampered with beforehand to protect criminal child abusers. After all, this concerns children and women who are under our protection and who have had to endure unimaginable suffering. There must be no confusion between victim and perpetrator, and any form of sexual violence or coercion against vulnerable individuals must be severely punished. This is no trivial matter, but a capital offence!!! It does not matter who committed these heinous crimes, whether they are rich or poor, politicians or ordinary citizens. It is completely irrelevant which party – Republican or Democrat – the people on the list belong to. As I said, it does not matter who committed these crimes, whether they are rich or poor, politicians or ordinary citizens. Anyone on this list who is proven to have committed a crime must be punished without question, regardless of party affiliation or social status. There are no vague boundaries here… only clear lines that have been shamelessly crossed out of selfishness, base instincts or for one’s own pleasure. Since no compassion was shown to the victims, why should the public feel compassion for the perpetrators!!! That would be a capitulation to the rule of law, society and one’s own conscience, and is absolutely unacceptable. Everyone should ask themselves what it would be like if it were their own child or wife who had to endure such torment. Shame on all those who in any way trivialise such acts, look the other way or, worse still, blame the victims. The perpetrators belong in prison and should serve their sentences in full. Full stop!!!!🚫 Publish the complete, unredacted Epstein files without tampering with them first. ☝️⚠️ Thank you very much for your attention to this matter! #EpsteinFiles #JeffreyEpstein #ReleaseTheFiles #JusticeForSurvivors #EpsteinSurvivors #BelieveSurvivors
- Oct 25, 202624x their median
Accidental Truth https://t.co/5f1oT5vHDe
- Oct 25, 20264.0x their median
Same God the MAGAts knee too https://t.co/A4ELIf447O
- Oct 24, 20262.5x their median
No Shit. Does Trump realize that the country can’t use bankruptcy to run from its Debt. https://t.co/ZGP3Ya5VvI
- Oct 25, 20262.1x their median
Dementia Boy will lose even when he cheats https://t.co/EHcRorflw4
- Oct 25, 20261.8x their median
https://t.co/sEutNu1Aek
- Oct 25, 2026
Raising Cost of Living and Inequality. Aims familiar https://t.co/uMcF2376tk
- Oct 24, 2026
Beer-throwing Trump staffer filmed getting tossed out of NBA game: report https://t.co/1Sw7GXTEZw
- Oct 25, 2026
🎈 https://t.co/kWyDD7YB8c
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 46K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 237 times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 1990x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #peacetalks, #putin, #russiaukrainewar.
- What is A DOG~'s engagement rate on X?
- A DOG~ (@StillADog) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 46,483 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.017%, A DOG~ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @StillADog have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @StillADog post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.