Back to @Steven_Ballmer's profile

Steve Ballmer engagement report

@Steven_Ballmer - 3.1M followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 3.1M followers
Per impression
0.568%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
0.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
89
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 89 interactions against 3.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.568% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 203K interactions, about 3175x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #justthefacts.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Steve Ballmer sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,313 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,878 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 264 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 5, 20233175x their median

    The presidents of @Harvard, @MIT, and @Penn were all asked the following question under oath at todayโ€™s congressional hearing on antisemitism: Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate [your universityโ€™s] code of conduct or rules regarding bullying or harassment? The answers they gave reflect the profound moral bankruptcy of Presidents Gay, Magill and Kornbluth. Representative @EliseStefanik was so shocked with the answers that she asked each of them the same question over and over again, and they gave the same answers over and over again. In short, they said: It โ€˜depends on the contextโ€™ and โ€˜whether the speech turns into conduct,โ€™ that is, actually killing Jews. This could be the most extraordinary testimony ever elicited in the Congress, certainly on the topic of genocide, which to remind us all is: โ€œthe deliberate killing of a large number of people from a particular nation or ethnic group with the aim of destroying that nation or groupโ€ The presidentsโ€™ answers reflect the profound educational, moral and ethical failures that pervade certain of our elite educational institutions due in large part to their failed leadership. Donโ€™t take my word for it. You must watch the following three minutes. By the end, you will be where I am. They must all resign in disgrace. If a CEO of one of our companies gave a similar answer, he or she would be toast within the hour. Why has antisemitism exploded on campus and around the world? Because of leaders like Presidents Gay, Magill and Kornbluth who believe genocide depends on the context. To think that these are the leaders of Ivy League institutions that are charged with the responsibility to educate our best and brightest. On the bright side, our congressional leaders deserve accolades for showing tremendous leadership and moral clarity in their statements, by the questions they asked, and the respectfulness with which they conducted the hearing. It was a masterclass of how our government and democracy should operate. If you have time, please watch the entire hearing. Throughout the hearing, the three behaved like hostile witnesses, exhibiting a profound disdain for the Congress with their smiles and smirks, and their outright refusal to answer basic questions with a yes or no answer.

    128K39K23K12K108M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20242248x their median

    Cool

    125K16K2.2K37516M viewsView on X
  • Nov 23, 2024499x their median

    In FY2023, the U.S. Government spent $6.16. trillion while only bringing in $4.47 trillion. The last budget surplus was in 2001. This trend must be reversed, and we must balance the budget. https://t.co/mzLaMTZQxA

    33K7.1K3.3K1.2K29M viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202470x their median

    Ahead of the US elections, I'm launching a new series with my civic not-for-profit @USAFacts to share the data on the big issues impacting America. No rhetoric. No bias. Just the facts.ย  Watch the first episodes on immigration and the budget: https://t.co/cDH5MOIaix

    4.6K1.0K5879579K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 202440x their median

    This is a hard day. I am honored to call Jerry a confidant, an advisor and a friend. Connie, my wife, called him my โ€˜basketball dad.โ€™ He was absolutely my basketball sage: wise, loyal and so much fun. If you were in his presence, you felt his competitiveness and his drive. He cared about everything and everyone. From the first day I met Jerry seven years ago, he inspired me with his intellect, honesty and enthusiasm. He never stopped. I spent a lot of time with him, some of the best times of my life. He always lent an ear, and he always had a quip. He always left me laughing. I will miss him.

    3.1K30812429220K viewsView on X
  • Jan 10, 202255x their median

    All smiles for @Yg_Trece for #NBAAllStar. ๐Ÿคฉ 1 RETWEET = 1 VOTE https://t.co/CVRfZfxTXb

    1.6K1.9K2224View on X
  • Jan 13, 202255x their median

    #ClipperNation, it's time to vote #PaulGeorge for #NBAAllStar. For every 50 retweets we will make the basketball bigger. ๐Ÿ€ https://t.co/O4FxQrkQaG

    1.8K1.6K5338View on X
  • Feb 18, 202254x their median

    Code + @Coldplay = #codeplay! We're teaming up with Coldplay to inspire students to code & dance. Create a dance to "Higher Power" โ€” the band might spotlight yours on social media, and you could get to see the band live! Let's see what you create! Visit https://t.co/qSCFke77Cu https://t.co/6p6X6tmxdX

    2.6K528178123View on X
  • May 3, 202232x their median

    Happy birthday, Ty Lue! ๐ŸŽ‰ For every comment/retweet, @Aspiration will plant one tree for Ty's birthday! https://t.co/8S2ss7KloF

    1.6K30413527View on X
  • Feb 6, 202232x their median

    RT if you love @patbev21

    1.2K7983617View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#justthefacts

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 89 interactions against 3.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.568% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 203K interactions, about 3175x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Steve Ballmer's engagement rate on X?
Steve Ballmer (@Steven_Ballmer) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,072,933 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Steve Ballmer sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,313 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Steven_Ballmer have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Steven_Ballmer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going