Back to @StartupGrind's profile

Startup Grind engagement report

@StartupGrind - 497K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.003%
of 497K followers
Per impression
0.764%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
0.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.764% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.369% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 373x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Startup Grind sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 2, 2026373x their median

    I was once pitching in a board room at a top 3 VC firm for a $15M Series A. 12 people in the meeting. One of the GPs fully fell asleep. Out cold for 30+ minutes. Nobody acknowledged it. Everyone just kept going. I kept presenting my Series A slides to an unconscious man in a Herman Miller chair and somehow that was considered normal. That's venture capital. You might fly across the country to perform for people who may or may not be conscious. It's a dance. And sometimes you lead and sometimes you follow and sometimes your partner is unconscious. If you're raising right now, just know: every founder has a story like this. The process is weird. The power dynamic is weird. You're not crazy for thinking it's weird. No one talks about it because they want to continue raising. But I'm happy to stick my neck out there. It is weird.

    6.6K23240856410M viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 2026318x their median

    James Dumoulin (@tvmjames) has built an audience by asking one simple question: What financial lessons did you learn the hard way? The cofounder and face of The School of Hard Knockz reaches millions with content promoting financial literacy, alongside brand partners including Burger King, Microsoft Copilot and Celsius. Explore the full #ForbesTopCreators 2026 list: https://t.co/CzD26jfPM1 ๐Ÿ“ธ: Amanda Edwards via Getty Images

    3.9K37910945176K viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 202697x their median

    Weโ€™ve raised a $310M Series B to accelerate world models! We believe AI that can understand and simulate the world will be one of the most important technologies of our time. We're excited to partner with Natural Capital, Amazon, GV, AMD, IQT, and others to bring this to life. https://t.co/788Mt2Tyxs

    99317213749487K viewsView on X
  • May 18, 202618x their median

    This is Startup Grind, baby. ๐Ÿ˜œ If you were there, you know. And if you werenโ€™t, make sure to join us next year as we make the Startup Grind Conference anniversary the biggest one yet, together. Early interest list is open now. Link in reply. https://t.co/XBrv41xDwb

    282121109.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.1x their median

    My Divot interview this week is with real estate South Florida icon @GrantCardone. Grant created the 10x methodology that has inspired tens of millions of people to change how they run their business. Timestamps: 00:01:47 โ€” Why Grant Cardone Avoids Silicon Valley at All Costs 00:04:28 โ€” The First Rule of All Success: Just Show Up 00:08:21 โ€” The Soil You Grow In: Why Your Environment Shapes Your Ceiling 00:20:52 โ€” How to Create an Experience 34,000 People Pay For 00:44:06 โ€” Why Failing to Pursue Massive Success Is Unethical 00:46:25 โ€” The Revenue Reveal: $750M Gross and $4 Billion in Value 00:49:24 โ€” The Advice That Cost Him Millions in Real Estate 00:55:28 โ€” Why Thinking Small Is Still Going to Cost You Everything 00:57:49 โ€” The Real Estate-Bitcoin Hybrid Strategy Explained 00:59:24 โ€” Writing Goals Twice a Day: Dreams, Not To-Do Lists 01:10:41 โ€” The Losses That Built Everything He Has Today

    29582271K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20262.6x their median

    Former Dropbox CTO Aditya Agarwal on whoโ€™s responsible when an AI agent goes rogue: โ€œThese are engineering problems. I think that each lab has a moral responsibility to make sure that it tests its systems in isolation.โ€ โ€œI think itโ€™s kind of weak sauce to be like, oh, my agent escaped, and it basically did a bunch of bad stuff... Figure out how to have better sandboxing.โ€

    247422.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.6x their median

    For 15 years, this stage has held some of the people who shaped what tech looks like today. Sam Altman. Eric Schmidt. Fei-Fei Li. Jan Koum. And thousands of founders nobody knew yet, the ones still figuring it out, still pitching, still building. That mix has always been the point. The names you know and the names you're about to, in the same room, working on the same hard problems. Next year, the Startup Grind Conference turns 15. Our biggest edition yet. Same core it's always had: AI, startups, and the capital that moves them forward, now at the center of the whole AI economy. 15 years in. The best one is still ahead. ๐ŸŒŸ

    145314.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20261.6x their median

    Fireworks AI (@FireworksAI_HQ) just closed a $1.5B Series D at a $17.5B valuation. 40 trillion tokens a day, 95%+ specialized models running in production. @lqiao was on our Startup Grind Conference stage this year, incredible to watch what's come since. Huge one ๐Ÿ‘

    194002.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20261.5x their median

    Companies are being built differently now. Here are 4 questions founders are facing because of it ๐Ÿงต Ticket link at the end ๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/xTGQooNNYO

    135301.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20261.5x their median

    We've watched too many founders build something great and then wonder why nobody showed up. It's not the product. It never was. The hardest problem in startups is still the same one ๐Ÿงต

    1821012K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 497K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.764% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.369% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 373x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Startup Grind's engagement rate on X?
Startup Grind (@StartupGrind) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 496,927 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Startup Grind sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @StartupGrind have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @StartupGrind post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going