Back to @Starlink's profile

Starlink engagement report

@Starlink - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.138%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
0.715%
362K views on a typical post
Reach
19.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
100 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 362K times each, and 0.715% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Starlink's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.138%, Starlink sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,424 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,888 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link40% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 40% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 327 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202611x their median

    The future of transport is safer, more enjoyable & gives you more time back With theater, music & gaming apps on a 22" touchscreen, Cybercab offers you a space to be productive or unwind Soon to be equipped with V5 Starlink hardware, too, for complete connectivity https://t.co/e0Xhvjky0E

    24K3.1K87394711M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202611x their median

    Views from of one of the first 26 Starlink V3 satellites successfully deployed to orbit by Starship Thanks for the ride, @SpaceX! https://t.co/B2SSUA0N0q

    24K3.6K5794791.8M viewsView on X
  • Feb 8, 202618x their median

    Fast, affordable internet. Available all around the world! Order in less than 2 minutes by visiting https://t.co/VvFvTR8D5a or, if you live in the US, by calling 1-888-GO-STARLINK to get connected with the Starlink service plan that works best for you 🛰️🌎❤️

    16K3.5K3.8K4729.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20264.9x their median

    Live views brought to you by @Starlink https://t.co/jdU5q8a6nQ

    9.9K1.1K35050987K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20264.1x their median

    Starlink-equipped buoys provided real-time video streaming in the Indian Ocean during Starship’s thirteenth test flight 🛰️🚀 https://t.co/BdvM6F5f0C

    9.2K1.0K2761425.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20264.4x their median

    Deployment of 20 @Starlink V3 satellites complete. Today's test will provide critical data as we prepare to expand our Starlink constellation https://t.co/jWKLwXGlsk

    8.7K9922871354.2M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20263.7x their median

    Constant communication is what makes autonomy like this safe. Early contact lets us take maneuvering responsibility, publish ephemeris faster than ground radar can catalog the object, and deorbit and keep commanding through demise if needed We treat early communications as a requirement, not a nice-to-have

    7.9K1.3K177175838K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20263.3x their median

    ANATEL just scored a huge win for the people of Brazil by voting to approve Starlink Mobile's full 2 GHz access with our global S-band priority. Starlink will put this critical mid-band spectrum to work to make sure every Brazilian has access to high-speed mobile broadband on their devices 🛰️📱

    7.4K748271113758K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20263.2x their median

    However, we cannot mitigate risk when another operator maneuvers without sharing a predicted trajectory that includes the burn. This is the biggest risk in LEO https://t.co/5sqbmW1aD7

    7.4K54922766839K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20264.5x their median

    Today’s flight test will deploy 20 next generation Starlink satellites, which will only have about 20 minutes to attempt a series of activation and connection tests before they reenter Earth’s atmosphere → https://t.co/ddXuJrRpOz https://t.co/mywMa8ahWS

    6.9K81220044760K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.6K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.138%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 362K times each, and 0.715% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 40% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 29K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Starlink's engagement rate on X?
Starlink (@Starlink) has an engagement rate of 0.138%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,872,645 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.138%, Starlink sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Starlink have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Starlink post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going