Stan Collymore engagement report
@StanCollymore - 837K followers on X
Measured over 103 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 837K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 103 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.431% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 103 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 189x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avfc, #astonvilla, #ballondor.
Measured over 103 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #avfc, #astonvilla, #ballondor.
Compared with accounts its own size
Stan Collymore's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.015%, Stan Collymore sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 18% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 18% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 175 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 25, 2026189x their median
Manchester City underreporting incomes & Salaries means England has lost hundreds of millions of Pounds in taxes.
- Feb 12, 2026163x their median
https://t.co/VXgQYEr3us
- Sep 19, 2026110x their median
Crazy Scenes as Andros Townsend gets ran over by a Roller! Luckily he wasn’t badly hurt afterwards, could’ve ended soo much worse Welcome to the Thai League https://t.co/EGI2jGfK6r
- Sep 25, 202695x their median
Opinion. If City's appeal fails then every trophy should be expunged from the records, removal from Premier League and EFL, a crippling fine and denial of fit and proper ownership. Biggest football story arguably in English football history.
- Sep 2, 202686x their median
MIKE DEAN’S SECRET PREMIER LEAGUE GAMES Ex-Premier League referee Mike Dean admits he used to play secret mini-games on the pitch while officiating top-flight matches. Mike Dean: “We used to say, ‘Right, we'll kick off now, right? See how long we can go without blowing a whistle.’ Done that a few times in the Premier, before VAR obviously. 20–25 minutes without blowing a whistle a few times.” “I used to stand in the center circle and see how long I could stay in the center circle before I had to leave.” Josh James: “Got about 15 minutes once in one game without leaving the center circle.” Mike Dean: “Easy money.” ft. Mike Dean, Jamie Vardy, Josh James
- Sep 7, 202637x their median
⛵️🌊 Un tesoro fra le onde, custodito dai pirati 🏴☠️ 🇬🇧 Un tributo alle nostre radici inglesi, un logo speciale, le bande orizzontali: ecco la nuova terza maglia rossoblù per la stagione 2026/27. All’arrembaggio! 🔴🔵 👉 Pre-ordinala su https://t.co/Vdyq8svV0M https://t.co/xre2jwb7O2
- Aug 23, 202633x their median
The @PremierLeague is back — IT’S MATCHDAY, VILLANS ✊ https://t.co/9ej0K2A9vy
- Aug 27, 202632x their median
https://t.co/wmNDsgJaVe
- Aug 25, 202623x their median
Another part of childhood gone, more legendary songs forever in the memory, a larger than life character in life's great journey who you'll never forget. Incredibly sad news, Rest in peace, Dolly. https://t.co/niXHf8iNRF
- Sep 8, 202622x their median
Nominated for the 2026 Men's Coach of the Year ⬇️ @UnaiEmery_ @AstonVilla #ballondor https://t.co/DVZ9UxfAwR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 122 interactions against 837K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 103 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.431% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 103 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 189x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #avfc, #astonvilla, #ballondor.
- What is Stan Collymore's engagement rate on X?
- Stan Collymore (@StanCollymore) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 103 original posts from the last 30 days against 836,676 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.015%, Stan Collymore sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @StanCollymore have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @StanCollymore post?
- Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.07 posts per day across the measured window.