Back to @StLouisBlues's profile

St. Louis Blues engagement report

@StLouisBlues - 797K followers on X

Measured over 89 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 797K followers
Per impression
0.72%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
3.03%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
174
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.3/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 174 interactions against 797K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 89 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 89 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

Measured over 89 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #stlblues.

Compared with accounts its own size

St. Louis Blues's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, St. Louis Blues sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link38% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 38% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202631x their median

    You're going to want to C this. https://t.co/60WCS5mpHR

    4.7K39187158486K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202614x their median

    Ozzy loved the Blues and the Blues loved Ozzy. Thatโ€™s why the first 10,000 fans at the St. Louis Blues / Pittsburgh Penguins game on Dec. 2 will receive an exclusive @OzzyOsbourne bobblehead. Learn more at https://t.co/7UYoYz1TQz https://t.co/cVWyED3xLI

    2.2K1702812140K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202611x their median

    From an 18-year-old at the draft to a husband, dad and Captain ๐Ÿ’™ https://t.co/IxT9eXnDYV

    1.8K523314190K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202610x their median

    Blues President of Hockey Operations Doug Armstrong has released a statement about prospect Matthew Mayich. https://t.co/jyPQjFhgBR

    1.6K1632811223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20269.1x their median

    BEHOLD https://t.co/fY4zZOlhaX

    1.4K119531772K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.2x their median

    WE PLAY HOCKEY THIS MONTH

    1.1K96291653K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20267.2x their median

    Wins against the Blackhawks always count ๐Ÿ˜‰ #stlblues https://t.co/MveNYOdz2o

    1.1K88191128K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.1x their median

    Red line flow ๐ŸŽถ This year's center ice design features an ode to the convergence of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers, an iconic St. Louis landmark and symbol. #stlblues https://t.co/Um3dLk4bPU

    1.1K72141676K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.0x their median

    Good luck! https://t.co/jEHTpljuys

    9975411544158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.3x their median

    Introducing the leadership team for your 2026-27 St. Louis Blues.

    765121123149K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#stlblues

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 174 interactions against 797K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 89 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 0.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 89 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

What is St. Louis Blues's engagement rate on X?
St. Louis Blues (@StLouisBlues) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 89 original posts from the last 30 days against 797,056 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, St. Louis Blues sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @StLouisBlues have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @StLouisBlues post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going