PlayerSells
Back to @Sporf's profile

SPORF engagement report

@Sporf - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.004%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.113%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
3.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
46
interactions (median)
Saved
0.002%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.113% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SPORF's engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, SPORF sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.006%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.319%
p902.64%
p99357.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,789 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 446,562 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.319%
90th percentile2.64%
99th percentile357.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%7.9K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 271 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 202635x their median

    THE MOST INSANE FOOTBALL SHIRT YOUโ€™LL SEE TODAY. ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ช After a financial crisis hit Deportivo Municipal, the club came up with a wild solution: sell spaces on their shirt to anyone willing to sponsor them. ๐Ÿ’ฐ For around $60 a spot, they managed to bring in 1,000 sponsors in just three months. ๐Ÿคฏ The result? A shirt absolutely COVERED from top to bottom and generating enough revenue to help overcome its financial crisis. ๐Ÿ‘

    1.5K108910214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20267.9x their median

    โ€œIf youโ€™re playing for a big Brazilian club and Barcelona, Real Madrid or Chelsea come for you, you have to leave. ๐Ÿ‘‹ If itโ€™s a 15th-place club in LaLiga or the Premier League, then itโ€™s ๐๐Ž๐“ worth it. Just stay at Palmeiras, Flamengo or the Brazilian club youโ€™re playing for, where you can truly develop and compete at the highest level." Do you agree with the Santos forward? ๐Ÿค”

    31917224199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20267.0x their median

    Remember Isaac Kearney, the young Liverpool and Mohamed Salah superfan? ๐Ÿฅนโค๏ธ Trabzonspor flew him out to Turkey as a special guest to surprise his hero at training following Salahโ€™s move to the club. ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท The pair were finally reunitedโ€ฆ and the smile says it all. ๐Ÿฅฐโค๏ธ Some moments are bigger than football. ๐Ÿซถ

    292261242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.9x their median

    Back when Sergio Agรผero revealed that he was set to sign for Chelsea in 2017, but Manchester City cancelled it ๐‹๐€๐’๐“ ๐Œ๐ˆ๐๐”๐“๐„! ๐Ÿ‘€ โ€œIn 2017, I was on the verge of going to Chelsea, and then Manchester City cancelled the deal in the last minute. Conte wanted me with Hazard... Diego Costa was leaving.โ€ ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ @Lagusneta Imagine these two on the same team! ๐Ÿ”ต

    170621106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.4x their median

    Arsenal are back in the race for Kenan Yฤฑldฤฑz! ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ”ด The Gunners are reportedly willing to offer up to ยฃ86m to sign the Juventus star. ๐Ÿ’ฐ https://t.co/uB1C59Xmqh

    13798341K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.1x their median

    CHAOS IN EGYPT! ๐Ÿ˜ณ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ฌ Egypt national team coach Hossam Hassan reportedly fainted and was rushed to the hospital after witnessing his two wives get into a violent fight at a hotel. ๐Ÿ‘€ Police detained both women following the incident, with reports claiming that he decided to divorce his first wife. ๐Ÿคฏ

    1091731266K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.6x their median

    Marcus Rashford thanks Jamie Carragher for shutting down Gary Nevilleโ€™s discussion about him. โŒ Gary Neville tried to bring Rashford into the conversation on Stick to Football, but Carragher frustratedly argued that the forward is discussed far too often. ๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Rashford shared the clip and thanked Carragher, saying he wants to focus on football without having his name mentioned every day. ๐Ÿค

    11461052K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.3x their median

    Two of the most iconic trios world football has ever seen! ๐Ÿ˜ฎโ€๐Ÿ’จ ๐Ÿ”ด MSN: Messi, Suรกrez, Neymar โšช๏ธ BBC: Benzema, Bale, Cristiano https://t.co/e0Zv7Fsqbw

    9654040K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.1x their median

    Manchester United are closing in on a deal to sign Carlos Baleba from Brighton. ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ”ด A ยฃ60m + ยฃ5m offer is reportedly on the table as talks between the clubs continue. ๐Ÿ’ฐ https://t.co/CDs53TjdUl

    8860137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.0x their median

    Nicolรกs Otamendi has practically turned his entire back into a canvas of tattoos inspired by his favourite TV series. ๐Ÿฅถ Not a bad collection at all from the Argentine CB. ๐ŸŽจ๐Ÿ“บ ๐†๐Ž๐€๐“ ๐“๐• ๐’๐„๐‘๐ˆ๐„๐’ ๐ˆ๐’... https://t.co/qjwUEDckPV

    7848153K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.113% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 35x its own typical post.

What is SPORF's engagement rate on X?
SPORF (@Sporf) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,258,068 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, SPORF sits above the 10th percentile of the 9,789 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sporf have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sporf post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going