Back to @Sporf's profile

SPORF engagement report

@Sporf - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.021%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
3.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.021% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 202x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #searchforcena, #sporf, #yoursporf.

Measured over 21 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #searchforcena, #sporf, #yoursporf.

Compared with accounts its own size

SPORF's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, SPORF sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 254 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 2026202x their median

    THE MOST INSANE FOOTBALL SHIRT YOU’LL SEE TODAY. 😂🇵🇪 After a financial crisis hit Deportivo Municipal, the club came up with a wild solution: sell spaces on their shirt to anyone willing to sponsor them. 💰 For around $60 a spot, they managed to bring in 1,000 sponsors in just three months. 🤯 The result? A shirt absolutely COVERED from top to bottom and generating enough revenue to help overcome its financial crisis. 👏

    1.5K108910214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202657x their median

    Man City really waved goodbye to a WHOLE SQUAD! 👀💰 Where would this team finish in the PL⁉️ https://t.co/YXv736tFuq

    3953415969K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202646x their median

    From Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? to the Champions League… Back in 2000, Valdas Dambrauskas appeared on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? The money he won helped him travel to England and begin his coaching journey, despite never having played professionally. He went on to gain experience with clubs including Manchester United, Fulham and Brentford before taking his first managerial job with ninth-tier side Kingsbury London Tigers, where he achieved the best results in the club’s history. Now, 26 years later, he’s taken Sabah FC into the Champions League for the first time ever. 🏆👏 Never give up! Respect 👊

    323401049K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202645x their median

    “If you’re playing for a big Brazilian club and Barcelona, Real Madrid or Chelsea come for you, you have to leave. 👋 If it’s a 15th-place club in LaLiga or the Premier League, then it’s 𝐍𝐎𝐓 worth it. Just stay at Palmeiras, Flamengo or the Brazilian club you’re playing for, where you can truly develop and compete at the highest level." Do you agree with the Santos forward? 🤔

    31817224199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202640x their median

    Remember Isaac Kearney, the young Liverpool and Mohamed Salah superfan? 🥹❤️ Trabzonspor flew him out to Turkey as a special guest to surprise his hero at training following Salah’s move to the club. 🇹🇷 The pair were finally reunited… and the smile says it all. 🥰❤️ Some moments are bigger than football. 🫶

    292261242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202639x their median

    Chelsea fans are NOT happy with Manchester City’s new third kit… 😭🔵 The design was created by a fan using PUMA’s AI Creator, and somehow it came out looking VERY familiar to Chelsea’s iconic 03/04 away shirt. 😂 At least AI has good taste in retro kits. 👀🤖 https://t.co/43uAjJDyIo

    275248252K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202637x their median

    With Preston North End currently in the relegation zone, Cody Rhodes has offered the players an incredible message of support Join the Search for Cena in today #SearchForCena #PNEFC https://t.co/OcWRxTYupj

    2443591060K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202633x their median

    Bruno Fernandes has reportedly been named the PFA Premier League Player of the Year for the 2025/26 season 🇵🇹 Bruno Fernandes’ 2025/26 Achievements: 🏆 Premier League Player of the Season 🏆 Premier League Playmaker of the Season 🏆 FWA Footballer of the Year 🥇 New Premier League assist record: 21 🅰️ ⚽️ 9 Goals 🔴 Helped Man United finish 3rd and qualify for the Champions League

    226273440K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202624x their median

    Matteo Guendouzi sparked absolute chaos after Fenerbahçe’s UCL playoff win over Lyon. The former Marseille midfielder was involved in a huge confrontation at full-time, with Lyon players and staff confronting him after the final whistle. 😳 🗣️ Guendouzi: “They insulted my mother and my family for more than 90 minutes, for me that was disrespectful. If after that we can’t celebrate the way we want to, I find that a shame.” Safe to say… Guendouzi enjoyed getting the last laugh against his former rivals. 👀😂

    18561147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202622x their median

    Back when Sergio Agüero revealed that he was set to sign for Chelsea in 2017, but Manchester City cancelled it 𝐋𝐀𝐒𝐓 𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐔𝐓𝐄! 👀 “In 2017, I was on the verge of going to Chelsea, and then Manchester City cancelled the deal in the last minute. Conte wanted me with Hazard... Diego Costa was leaving.” 🗣️ @Lagusneta Imagine these two on the same team! 🔵

    170621106K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#searchforcena#sporf#yoursporf#pnefc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 21 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.021% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 21 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 202x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #searchforcena, #sporf, #yoursporf.

What is SPORF's engagement rate on X?
SPORF (@Sporf) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 21 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,255,137 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, SPORF sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sporf have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sporf post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going