Back to @SpeakerPelosi's profile

Nancy Pelosi engagement report

@SpeakerPelosi - 8.2M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 8.2M followers
Per impression
1.99%
157K views on a typical post
Reach
1.92%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 8.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 157K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Nancy Pelosi's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 67% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, Nancy Pelosi sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 318 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 17, 202647x their median

    Obviously, Donald Trump is a loser.

    66K6.7K21K1.5K3.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202618x their median

    On October 16, 2019, I told Donald Trump, “With you, Mr. President, all roads lead to Putin.” On October 16, 2026, Trump signed an executive order waiving new sanctions on Russia passed by bipartisan majorities in Congress and signed into law just last month. This decision insults America’s commitment to democracy and our brave men and women in uniform, as Russia helps Iran target American forces. I join Republican senators in condemning this unconscionable capitulation to a Russian dictator who illegally invaded Ukraine and butchers innocent civilians. As I have asked for years: What does Putin have on Trump that he would sell out America’s values?

    41K11K3.1K536935K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20267.0x their median

    The words of an American President weigh a ton. He must not be frivolous with the weight of his office. Donald Trump has gone beyond the pale saying Iran can “take out” Los Angeles and San Diego. How could he say the slaughter of Americans is a "small price to pay"? The American people expect much more of a U.S. President.

    11K1.8K9.0K4781.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20266.1x their median

    Under the cover of darkness, Republicans confirmed Donald Trump’s personal lawyer to serve as Attorney General. The American people deserve a Justice Department that defends the rule of law, not one weaponized to protect the President, reward his allies & shield his corruption.

    8.9K1.9K7.7K342515K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20265.3x their median

    Breaking News: Federal officials acknowledged in court documents that they canceled grants to states that didn’t vote for President Trump in 2024. https://t.co/FeH69OK3fq https://t.co/sJXQpdCDtt

    9.1K4.7K9056031.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.6x their median

    Freedom of the press is a right guaranteed by the First Amendment—not granted at the pleasure of the President. The free press represents the people, and Trump doesn’t get to decide that they can’t cover his presidency because he doesn’t approve of their reporting.

    6.6K1.3K6.1K287772K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20264.1x their median

    Happy Birthday, President @BarackObama! Congratulations on your magnificent birthday gift to the American people—the Obama Presidential Center. Your leadership continues to inspire millions to believe in the power of public service and in the promise of our democracy. https://t.co/zNsOUC66rE

    11K1.2K73435234K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.1x their median

    Sixty-two years ago, President Johnson signed the Food Stamp Act into law, making a solemn promise: in America, no family should go hungry. Today, the Trump Administration is proudly betraying that promise—ripping food out of the mouths of children with their cruel cuts to SNAP.

    5.6K1.4K5.5K208271K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20265.4x their median

    “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

    7.0K8511.4K87414K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.5x their median

    Four years ago, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act into law—lowering prescription drug costs, creating good-paying jobs and making historic investments to address the climate crisis. Now, Trump is dismantling that progress, raising costs and prioritizing polluters over America’s next generation.

    4.2K1.1K2.3K116291K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 8.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 157K times each, and 1.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 95K interactions, about 47x its own typical post.

What is Nancy Pelosi's engagement rate on X?
Nancy Pelosi (@SpeakerPelosi) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 8,181,553 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, Nancy Pelosi sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SpeakerPelosi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SpeakerPelosi post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going