PlayerSells
Back to @Sophie_Choudry's profile

Sophie C engagement report

@Sophie_Choudry - 2.1M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.026%
of 2.1M followers
Per impression
1.61%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
1.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
544
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
18 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 544 interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 481K interactions, about 883x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aaib, #airindia, #aviation.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #aaib, #airindia, #aviation.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sophie C's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.026%, Sophie C sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.007% to 0.047%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link0% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%7.9K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 266 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 15, 2026883x their median

    And so the World Cup final will be between two teams who couldn’t beat Cape Verde in 90 minutes.

    437K42K7649885.7M viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026273x their median

    BREAKING: FIFA are set to investigate the behaviour of Argentina after the final whistle at the World Cup final. 🚨 https://t.co/Z1soC4thpt

    129K15K3.1K1.5K4.7M viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 2026260x their median

    Vozinha and Cabo Verde making history 🇨🇻 #FIFAWorldCup https://t.co/TIEc3lh2GO

    125K16K5924221.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 2026178x their median

    What the f*ck is this referee doing? Argentina should have 5 bookings by now. Dirty team going woefully unpunished.

    84K6.9K5.3K6194.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026159x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Zinedine Zidane is the new France MANAGER. https://t.co/2htVPOslF2

    80K4.6K3821.1K4.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026147x their median

    Argentina players starting fights as soon as the whistle blows, attacking Spanish players. Nobody deserves to lose this World Cup more than Argentina. The dirtiest, nastiest team in the tournament. Pathetic. Class from Spain, the whole world has been behind you 🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸

    69K10K63686552K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026122x their median

    How do Argentina keep getting away with so many aggressive fouls man? It’s honestly so frustrating to watch.

    61K4.7K347951.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 2026120x their median

    I genuinely don't understand it. If a goal is ruled out because of an accidental standing on a player's foot, how is Salah not given a penalty? You can't have it both ways. Either both are fouls, or neither are. That's all fans ask for consistency.

    57K7.6K771180954K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202694x their median

    I’m so mad about this and all the other shit Argentina got away with https://t.co/b3q0suDSHy

    42K5.3K3.4K5941.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202648x their median

    また出た... アルゼンチン選手、イングランド選手の後頭部を激しく殴打も、レッドどころかイエローも出ず批判殺到 イングランド対アルゼンチン準決勝、開始わずか3分。エンソ・フェルナンデスがルーズボールを追う中、エリオット・アンダーソンの後頭部付近を強打。 イングランド勢が一斉に猛抗議。しかし主審イスマイル・エルファスが下した判定はフリーキックのみ。イエローカードすら出ない →FIFAはリプレイを一度流しただけで審議終了。VARも沈黙を貫いた。頭部への危険な接触は本来一発退場の対象だ。 判定基準はどこにあるのか。ワールドカップの公正性が、また一つ疑われる。

    21K4.6K3921821.5M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#aaib#airindia#aviation#awarapan2#bigimpactaward

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 544 interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.61% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 481K interactions, about 883x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aaib, #airindia, #aviation.

What is Sophie C's engagement rate on X?
Sophie C (@Sophie_Choudry) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,095,749 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.026%, Sophie C sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sophie_Choudry have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sophie_Choudry post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going