Back to @SolvProtocol's profile

Solv Protocol engagement report

@SolvProtocol - 303K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.013%
of 303K followers
Per impression
0.32%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.02%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
39
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 303K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 43% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 28x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #rwas, #stablecoins. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #bitcoin, #rwas, #stablecoins.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Solv Protocol sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 353 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 7, 202628x their median

    After an extensive security review, we have decided to deprecate @LayerZero_Core bridges for SolvBTC and xSolvBTC, and migrate to @Chainlink CCIP as our official cross-chain infrastructure solution for $700M+ in tokenized BTC (SolvBTC & xSolvBTC). In light of recent industry events, Solv reviewed its existing bridges and found that CCIP provided the strongest security assurances through its secure-by-default architecture, native risk controls and proactive monitoring. Through CCIP, we are providing our users with the highest assurance that the most secure infrastructure is securing all cross-chain transfers. Furthermore, CCIP because it is widely regarded as the gold standard for decentralized interoperability and officially recognized by the @WhiteHouse as critical infrastructure for the digital asset ecosystem. This migration reinforces Solv’s unwavering commitment to delivering institutional-grade protection for our users. Learn more: https://t.co/xjYk8OvIqg

    8191358864227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202614x their median

    Over the past few weeks, there has been public discussion around a specific BTC+ redemption case, which has also raised broader questions about BTC+ reserves, redemptions, and security. Based on the information confirmed to date, Solv would like to clarify the following: 1. BTC+ subscriptions and redemptions are operating normally. This is an individual case in which a specific transaction triggered a risk review. The BTC+ subscription and redemption mechanism continues to operate normally. 2. The relevant assets remain safe and fully preserved within the protocol. The assets associated with this case remain fully preserved within the protocol and have not been transferred, destroyed, or otherwise disposed of. The matter is currently being reviewed under Solv’s established risk management process. 3. The case will continue to be handled based on verifiable information and evidence. Solv will not make determinations solely based on social-media identities or unilateral public statements. The review will continue in accordance with established procedures, and where necessary, Solv will cooperate with legal counsel or relevant judicial procedures for further verification. Solv will not provide further public responses to other public discussions based on online identities or similar circumstances. We will continue to prioritize asset security and consistent risk management standards to ensure the normal operation of BTC+.

    656373109390K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202612x their median

    *Notice of Commencement of a Joint Study in the Digital Credit Domain Utilizing $BTC, $JPYC, and Security Tokens* https://t.co/3Bvm54vWLW

    38054519253K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20266.3x their median

    Solv's foundational cross-chain architecture is now unified under @chainlink's CCIP standard. Check this one pager on how Solv leverages @chainlink's security standards to make $BTC more productive in DeFi ↓ https://t.co/FJCSQeoMMD

    2032416212K viewsView on X
  • Mar 25, 20264.7x their median

    We are proud to unveil Whitelist Prestige, a new on-chain liquidity primitive designed to enhance the stability and robustness of the SolvBTC ecosystem. This mechanism allows strategic partners to atomically redeem SolvBTC for underlying Bitcoin assets in a single transaction, bypassing DEX pools entirely. Check the technical specifications: • Atomic Redemptions: Guaranteed single-transaction swaps • Initial Buffers: Live on Ethereum and BNB Chain • Zero Market Impact: Open market isolation of large liquidations. • No Change for Retail: Standard minting, redemption flows, and 1:1 reserve backing remains unchanged. Institutional Integration: Whitelist Prestige is specifically engineered for lending protocols and institutional liquidators. Access is granted through a governance-aligned whitelisting process to ensure responsible ecosystem growth. Partnership Inquiry: Institutions and lending platforms looking to integrate this primitive as part of their risk management strategy are invited to connect with the Solv team. Full technical specifications and contract interfaces are now available in our official documentation.

    158915217K viewsView on X
  • May 29, 20263.4x their median

    .@solvprotocol x @ourbit are teaming up 🟪🟩 “ourbit flexible earn”now integrates solv to deliver optimized btc yield earn up to 11% apr on btc with daily payouts buy the dip. grow your port https://t.co/MA8EK615Ar

    75154125.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.7x their median

    Cap is the home of BTCFi. With over $180 Million of the asset on our platform, BTC is being utilized by underwriters such as @Bedrock_DeFi, @Lombard_Finance, & @SolvProtocol to provide financial guarantees for institutional-grade borrowers. BTC is more productive on Cap. https://t.co/jyfjWHgX5J

    591725320K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 20262.6x their median

    As we build the future of programmable Bitcoin yields, resilient systems like @chainlink's CCIP are needed to supplement Solv's inherent security architecture. We're leveraging these features: https://t.co/Jbr4p0q4em

    8612314.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20262.3x their median

    BTC Onchain Earn is now live. Built with @SolvProtocol. • On-chain yield • Flexible redemption • Starts from 0.001 BTC • Currently ~3–4% APR (variable) Start here 👇 https://t.co/NLzjuppgwc https://t.co/1hzqljxIUT

    352727117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.2x their median

    Something new is coming to Venus. 👀 A new partnership. A new institutional-grade vault. Built to bring more institutional capital onchain. Tomorrow. 🟡 https://t.co/hK3WvrtkZR

    6489620K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin#rwas#stablecoins#payments#solv

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 303K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.03% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 43% are part of a thread and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 28x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #rwas, #stablecoins. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Solv Protocol's engagement rate on X?
Solv Protocol (@SolvProtocol) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 302,650 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Solv Protocol sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SolvProtocol have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @SolvProtocol post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going