Back to @SoloFutbolMemes's profile

SOLOFÚTBOLMEMES⚽ engagement report

@SoloFutbolMemes - 445K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 445K followers
Per impression
0.825%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
2.56%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
94
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 445K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.825% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 549x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SOLOFÚTBOLMEMES⚽'s engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, SOLOFÚTBOLMEMES⚽ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 242 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 2026549x their median

    Arda Guler ya aprendió a posar https://t.co/rtGIx8Inmc

    50K7352892619.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026487x their median

    https://t.co/xFt9Hry0sh

    41K4.7K1763171.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 2026335x their median

    pero guler 😳 https://t.co/zr62lnVJRT

    30K6221752984.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026296x their median

    🚨 NO ES BROMA: Pidió €60.000 de pensión y el juez fijó €900 "La pensión es para la hija, no para mantener a la madre" 💬🔥 Una disputa relacionada con la manutención de la hija del futbolista Michael Olise 🇫🇷 ha llamado bastante la atención por la enorme diferencia entre la cantidad solicitada y la cantidad finalmente fijada por el juez La madre habría solicitado una pensión de €60.000, mientras que la resolución estableció una cantidad de €900 para cubrir las necesidades de la menor El principio que resume la decisión es contundente: la pensión alim***nticia tiene como finalidad garantizar el bienestar y las necesidades del hijo, no convertirse en una fuente de ingresos para el progenitor que la recibe Justo o injusto

    24K2.0K1.2K2211.8M viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 2026131x their median

    Evolucionó 😳 https://t.co/AboGAdWlyn

    12K3371513175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202669x their median

    Jhon Jader Duran se reporto con su granito de arena 🙏 https://t.co/TaLNa2sM9q

    6.2K2514712271K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 202668x their median

    ESPN hizo creer que había una imagen gigante de Messi en la India hasta que alguien publicó la imagen real jajajajaja https://t.co/mD9OgAi1ov

    5.9K3773214276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 202659x their median

    SUCEDIÓ OTRA VEZ 😭💔 Informa Fabrizio Romano que la Juventus canceló los planes de firmar al Dibu Martínez. Tomaron esa decisión hace días y se lo acaban de comunicar al Aston Villa y al portero argentino. Recordemos que hace dos años pensó que lo iba a fichar el Manchester United y así se despidió de la afición del Aston Villa. Hoy le pasó lo mismo pero ni siquiera intentó despedirse OTRA VEZ.

    4.8K51319728386K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202621x their median

    https://t.co/KRV4FrazSL

    1.9K1081825K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 202621x their median

    😮‍💨💎UFFF, la nueva camiseta alternativa del Real Madrid. https://t.co/Jvj3OLk1G9

    1.9K8516772K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 445K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.825% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.56% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 52K interactions, about 549x its own typical post.

What is SOLOFÚTBOLMEMES⚽'s engagement rate on X?
SOLOFÚTBOLMEMES⚽ (@SoloFutbolMemes) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 445,092 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, SOLOFÚTBOLMEMES⚽ sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SoloFutbolMemes have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SoloFutbolMemes post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going