Back to @SocialGeek_Co's profile

Social Geek engagement report

@SocialGeek_Co - 193K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 193K followers
Per impression
0%
603 views on a typical post
Reach
0.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 603 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.312% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2 interactions.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Social Geek's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Social Geek sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link95% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 95% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 1, 2026

    Google anunció Gemini 4 Argon, su nuevo modelo de inteligencia artificial de frontera. Es el primer modelo de la generación Gemini 4 y llega después de un período de casi diez meses desde la serie Gemini 3 https://t.co/qsEPbggSJQ

    2000774 viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    Parte de un cohete de Elon Musk chocó contra la Luna tras más de un año a la deriva. La NASA confirmó el impacto no planificado de la etapa superior de un Falcon 9 https://t.co/02qGzHQlp1

    10011.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 2026

    Google propone un acceso más fácil y seguro mediante un breve video selfie para verificar la identidad del usuario @googleespanol https://t.co/gLIgkX4cYW

    0200631 viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    Muse Charm, el dispositivo de bolsillo con el que Meta quiere llevar su IA a todas partes https://t.co/ggG3Jwi8A1

    0001879 viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Los smartphones de Motorola tendrán audio envidiable: la marca confirma su alianza con Bang & Olufsen https://t.co/NZhmKdZpvc

    1000462 viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 2026

    WhatsApp anunció una novedad con la que nunca más tendrás que compartir tu número https://t.co/exRnU240TR

    0100481 viewsView on X
  • Jun 17, 2026

    Google ha lanzado Android 17 en su versión estable, una actualización que trae varias novedades importantes. https://t.co/4HfkakpJxJ

    1000294 viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 2026

    Meta amenaza el reinado de X: su red social Threads alcanza los 500 millones de usuarios https://t.co/UdFlojhnWM

    1000270 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    Colombia avanza hacia la prohibición de redes sociales para menores de 14 años https://t.co/qYVQQ8ghHz

    0000411 viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 2026

    Paramount completó este martes la compra de Warner Bros. Discovery, consolidándose como el nuevo gigante de Hollywood https://t.co/tlBHj4WYTg

    0000607 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 193K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 603 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.312% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 95% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2 interactions.

What is Social Geek's engagement rate on X?
Social Geek (@SocialGeek_Co) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 193,488 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Social Geek sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SocialGeek_Co have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SocialGeek_Co post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going