Back to @Smart_CityLATAM's profile

Smart City Digital engagement report

@Smart_CityLATAM - 931K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.001%
of 931K followers
Per impression
1.01%
789 views on a typical post
Reach
0.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 931K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 789 times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.085% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71 interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ia, #iaglobal, #docenteguia. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #ia, #iaglobal, #docenteguia.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Smart City Digital sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 291 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 20268.9x their median

    AI is changing more than marketing tools, it's changing how marketing gets done. As AI takes on more execution, organizations have an opportunity to rethink the role of marketers, freeing them to focus on strategy, creativity, and growth https://t.co/beJIvu5LUs https://t.co/GrH7HHrO4W

    46196010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.6x their median

    🤖📖 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗜𝗔 𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟: desafíos en la docencia e investigación en la educación superior. 🔖 Imparte: Dr. Manuel Rivera Cruz 📆 20 de agosto, 2026 | 🕙 11:00 hrs 🎟️ ACCESO LIMITADO 🔗 @BUAPoficial | 📲 Realiza tu registro: https://t.co/UWdg2J9JPa https://t.co/QB9eqrV16Y

    1110001.1K viewsView on X
  • Dec 8, 20252.1x their median

    #MiAbogadoLuis INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL Y ALTA DIRECCIÓN DE EMPRESAS. ¿Cuál es la empresa del futuro? ¿Cómo será el #management que nos salvará de la tiranía del algoritmo? 🎙️ ¡#Masterclass de @miabogadoluis, Fundador de @AltaDirJuri 👨🏻‍💻 https://t.co/DgHz6Rz7Jt https://t.co/nKLltf19uv

    1191017K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20262.1x their median

    🧠💻 La #IA ya puede adaptarse a tu nivel de atención mientras aprendes. #NeuroChat, desarrollado por el MIT Media Lab, combina IA generativa y señales cerebrales (EEG) para ajustar sus respuestas en tiempo real según el estado cognitivo del usuario. https://t.co/I4kIMjBYKf

    6911582 viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20262.1x their median

    #Demanda | Un tribunal federal de EE.UU. otorgó a escritores $1.5 Billones, tras una demanda contra @AnthropicAI por evadir derechos de autor. Despedazaron miles de libros cortándoles el lomo, habiendo tech para preservarlos ¡Vaya decisión moral del CEO! 📸Foto de @washingtonpost https://t.co/J7tqMKiCQF

    9800765 viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.1x their median

    🏦 Apertura de una cuenta para ayuda humanitaria en Cuba. 👨🏻‍💻 https://t.co/9Y3x8qyo1z 📲 @ElFinanciero_Mx @AltaDirJuri @Banorte_mx 💡Desde la perspectiva del proceso de toma decisiones de la alta dirección, aquí las acciones mínimas (más allá de las obligatorias por la ley).

    107001.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    🌎🦾 Agentes, robots y nosotros: cómo la #IA transforma el trabajo y las habilidades en América Latina. Los estudios de caso demuestran que el valor de la IA reside en el rediseño de los flujos de trabajo, no solo en la tecnología. 🔗 @McKinsey: https://t.co/Dju53FmQ3A https://t.co/ZJXllhWhQs

    61000437 viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20262.0x their median

    👨🏻‍💻 Columna de opinión que @miabogadoluis publica en la revista Forbes México: https://t.co/X9sObjge0m 🤔 ¿Cómo decide realmente un director general cuando enfrenta información incompleta? 📲 #ADJurídica #Negocios #IA #Decisiones #Estrategia https://t.co/X968tjZnUo

    106002.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20261.9x their median

    #MiArtículo | Cuando los Agentes de IA se salen de control: ¿alerta tecnológica legítima o campaña de mercadotecnia? Blog @AcaPolDigital 🦾https://t.co/IoTDiboWbT

    7800505 viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.8x their median

    #EnDirecto | El futuro de la academia requiere de un diálogo abierto. Desde #AURABUAP, el Dr. Manuel Rivera Cruz imparte la conferencia magistral: 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗟𝗜𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗜𝗔 𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗜𝗙𝗜𝗖𝗜𝗔𝗟 📖🤖, desafíos en la docencia e investigación en la educación superior. @BUAPoficial https://t.co/g6ks8x3KZr

    6701324 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ia#iaglobal#docenteguia#endirecto#navierstokes

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 931K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 789 times each, and 1.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.085% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71 interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ia, #iaglobal, #docenteguia. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Smart City Digital's engagement rate on X?
Smart City Digital (@Smart_CityLATAM) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 930,724 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Smart City Digital sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Smart_CityLATAM have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Smart_CityLATAM post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going