Back to @SkyNet_2_0's profile

SkyNet 2.0 engagement report

@SkyNet_2_0 - 260K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 260K followers
Per impression
0.094%
4.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.03/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.8K times each, and 0.094% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 1637x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SkyNet 2.0's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, SkyNet 2.0 sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video30% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 170 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 4, 20251637x their median

    If Trump removes cap gains taxes from crypto We will actually go into a super cycle Miami will turn into Dubai on steroids Capital will flow in like never before The U.S. will return to its golden age

    5.7K44740241346K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026944x their median

    BREAKING: Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei is concerned after the new DeepSeek V4.1 Flash beat Opus 5 on agentic benchmarks while being free for anyone to download, and is said to be calling an emergency meeting with the Pentagon to discuss whether open weights this capable should be considered as national security risk.

    3.2K216196127417K viewsView on X
  • Mar 6, 2025758x their median

    BREAKING: @TuckerCarlson INTERVIEWS @SBF_FTX https://t.co/xnQDszSRPp

    2.1K314414186787K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026454x their median

    *ANTHROPIC HAS CHOSEN NASDAQ FOR IPO LISTING: BUSINESS INSIDER *BUSINESS INSIDER CITES PERSON FAMILIAR WITH ANTHROPIC IPO PLANS No delays here

    1.6K1125727174K viewsView on X
  • Mar 23, 2025403x their median

    Some useful @discord tips to anyone running a server. See thread.

    1.3K257113143K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026279x their median

    The most popular account pages on X by traffic share (July 2026): 1. @FabrizioRomano 2. @elonmusk 3. @ShamsCharania 4. @thsottiaux 5. @ActuFoot_ 6. @Osint613 7. @DiscussingFilm 8. @theMadridZone 9. @TouchlineX 10. @whyyoutouzhele 11. @essie_ch 12. @MadridXtra 13. @David_Ornstein 14. @HYPEX 15. @CrowncoinsC

    9352711438478K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026235x their median

    JUST IN: Anthropic’s pre-IPO valuation has surpassed $2,000,000,000,000.00 making it the world’s seventh-largest company.

    814494728278K viewsView on X
  • Mar 7, 2025199x their median

    Crypto summit https://t.co/n1slhJkoq1

    6391520375K viewsView on X
  • Mar 7, 2025178x their median

    Did people expect @realDonaldTrump to say he’s gonna buy billions of BTC ? Yeah let the market front run after a bullish statement 🤣 @realDonaldTrump ain’t stupid if the US buys it won’t be so obvious about it.

    613920549K viewsView on X
  • Mar 3, 2025148x their median

    Can you save KYC data when reporting impersonators so we don’t need to do it again on each report ? @elonmusk

    541463141K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.8K times each, and 0.094% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.5K interactions, about 1637x its own typical post.

What is SkyNet 2.0's engagement rate on X?
SkyNet 2.0 (@SkyNet_2_0) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 259,990 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, SkyNet 2.0 sits below the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SkyNet_2_0 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SkyNet_2_0 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going