Back to @SiteGround's profile

SiteGround engagement report

@SiteGround - 133K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 133K followers
Per impression
0%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.01%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SiteGround's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, SiteGround sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link27% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 247 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 24, 2026

    We asked 7,000+ WordPress owners what they wish AI could do for their site, and it wasn't writing blog posts, it was running the site itself, updates, bulk price edits, the daily grind. So we built an AI Agent that actually does it. Find the full report: https://t.co/aD1C4XBxwn https://t.co/bK5CBItLQx

    20302.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    We experienced an issue with our Content Delivery Network (CDN). As a result, some users may have encountered 500 Internal Server Errors or SSL certificate warnings when accessing our sites. Our admin team immediately located the cause of the issue, and it has already been fixed. We apologize for the inconvenience!

    31002.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    Our Coderick AI Discord is officially live, a place to share what you're building, find prompts that get you results, and get help from people who get it. Come hang out with us: https://t.co/aUIQPbNcWb https://t.co/cF41KW0KvN

    10211.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026

    SiteGround Email Marketing now allows you to create email campaigns by simply using AI. Pick a starter, answer a few quick questions about your business, and your campaign shows up ready to edit, with the subject line, pre-header, and body already in place. See for yourself: https://t.co/zkrtF7Qe2F

    30101.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 2026

    Coderick AI connects with Stripe now, so taking payments on your site just got simple. Describe what you're selling, connect Stripe, and your full checkout gets built for you, no plugins, no code, no merchant account maze. Full guide here: https://t.co/8gOWSKkV14 https://t.co/4ZB2xF9t48

    31001.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    Most admin work is repetitive menu-clicking. Our AI agent for WordPress replaces it with one chat: publish posts, run WooCommerce, update plugins, generate SEO metadata, manage users, even restructure your site. Try it now. โ†“

    11101.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 2026

    AI can design your site, prototype it, even write all the code, and somehow it's still not online. Thatโ€™s because every tool hands you a piece and stops right before the part that actually goes live. Coderick AI eliminates that barrier. Try it now โ†“

    30001.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Watch an online store come together in real time, built from an idea, with Coderick AI. No code, no limits, for any idea and any use case. Start building now: https://t.co/JR7hhZ4LUr https://t.co/GKrxWFUNvz

    20001.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026

    Most WordPress owners think adding plugins means adding capability, but really they're adding entry points, and every login you create is one more thing that can go wrong. We put the actual cost in writing, have a read: https://t.co/EEwC6GUDPD https://t.co/wKCwE1LfO3

    20002.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 2026

    In our last webinar, we took an existing site and rebuilt it completely using Coderick AI, new design, new categories, a community feature, an admin panel, all from one URL. Watch the full demo. โ†“

    1010892 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

What is SiteGround's engagement rate on X?
SiteGround (@SiteGround) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 132,985 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, SiteGround sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SiteGround have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SiteGround post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going