SiteGround engagement report
@SiteGround - 133K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
SiteGround's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, SiteGround sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 27% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 27% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 247 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 24, 2026
We asked 7,000+ WordPress owners what they wish AI could do for their site, and it wasn't writing blog posts, it was running the site itself, updates, bulk price edits, the daily grind. So we built an AI Agent that actually does it. Find the full report: https://t.co/aD1C4XBxwn https://t.co/bK5CBItLQx
- Sep 17, 2026
We experienced an issue with our Content Delivery Network (CDN). As a result, some users may have encountered 500 Internal Server Errors or SSL certificate warnings when accessing our sites. Our admin team immediately located the cause of the issue, and it has already been fixed. We apologize for the inconvenience!
- Sep 17, 2026
Our Coderick AI Discord is officially live, a place to share what you're building, find prompts that get you results, and get help from people who get it. Come hang out with us: https://t.co/aUIQPbNcWb https://t.co/cF41KW0KvN
- Aug 6, 2026
SiteGround Email Marketing now allows you to create email campaigns by simply using AI. Pick a starter, answer a few quick questions about your business, and your campaign shows up ready to edit, with the subject line, pre-header, and body already in place. See for yourself: https://t.co/zkrtF7Qe2F
- Jul 14, 2026
Coderick AI connects with Stripe now, so taking payments on your site just got simple. Describe what you're selling, connect Stripe, and your full checkout gets built for you, no plugins, no code, no merchant account maze. Full guide here: https://t.co/8gOWSKkV14 https://t.co/4ZB2xF9t48
- Aug 13, 2026
Most admin work is repetitive menu-clicking. Our AI agent for WordPress replaces it with one chat: publish posts, run WooCommerce, update plugins, generate SEO metadata, manage users, even restructure your site. Try it now. โ
- Jul 31, 2026
AI can design your site, prototype it, even write all the code, and somehow it's still not online. Thatโs because every tool hands you a piece and stops right before the part that actually goes live. Coderick AI eliminates that barrier. Try it now โ
- Aug 19, 2026
Watch an online store come together in real time, built from an idea, with Coderick AI. No code, no limits, for any idea and any use case. Start building now: https://t.co/JR7hhZ4LUr https://t.co/GKrxWFUNvz
- Aug 7, 2026
Most WordPress owners think adding plugins means adding capability, but really they're adding entry points, and every login you create is one more thing that can go wrong. We put the actual cost in writing, have a read: https://t.co/EEwC6GUDPD https://t.co/wKCwE1LfO3
- Jul 10, 2026
In our last webinar, we took an existing site and rebuilt it completely using Coderick AI, new design, new categories, a community feature, an admin panel, all from one URL. Watch the full demo. โ
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 133K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.
- What is SiteGround's engagement rate on X?
- SiteGround (@SiteGround) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 132,985 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, SiteGround sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SiteGround have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SiteGround post?
- Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.