Back to @SirPareshRawal's profile

Paresh Rawal engagement report

@SirPareshRawal - 3.2M followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.328%
of 3.2M followers
Per impression
10.6%
101K views on a typical post
Reach
3.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.328%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 101K times each, and 10.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Paresh Rawal's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.328%, Paresh Rawal sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,027 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,983 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 139 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 11, 20264.4x their median

    Cancer patient was about to die. She pleaded. Her plea has been listed 57 times. The court has still not heard it. Teesta Setalvad was about to be jailed. She pleaded. Her plea was listed out of turn. The court heard it at midnight. Cancer patient is dead. Teesta is alive. https://t.co/Dn68KeVZ86

    33K13K1.2K508952K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20262.8x their median

    RESPECT 🫡 SMIT MACHHAR .

    28K1.6K977199K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.2x their median

    I am sure of one thing. If the plane had crashed, BBC & NYT would have blamed the Indian pilot. And sadly, a large number of Indian liberals too. In fact, this is almost a Tukaram Omble moment. Had Tukaram Omble not captured Kasab, ecosystem would have blamed 26/11 on RSS.

    19K4.7K19597321K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.2x their median

    To put it with humility and respect that it should the priority and Dharm of Honourable CM @Dev_Fadnavis ji to protect Shri @Tukaram_IndIAS that he should not be xfered or shunted out of his department. 🙏🙏🙏

    21K2.5K22545426K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20261.8x their median

    Remembering NANA PATEKARS FAMOUS DIALOGUE: Ek Machhhar Aadmiko …!

    17K1.2K45781443K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202665x their median

    कल सुप्रीम_कोर्ट में वीर सावरकर जी को "माफ़ी वीर" कहने के मानहानि केस में जज ने कहा कि अगर सिर्फ़ चिट्ठियों के आधार पर ये कहा जा रहा है कि वीर सावरकर "माफ़ी वीर" हैं, तो उन्होंने मोहनदास करमचंद गांधी के ब्रिटिश लॉर्ड और वायसराय को लिखे 12 खत दिखाते हुए राहुल गांधी के वकील अभिषेक मनु सिंघवी से पूछा कि क्या आपके क्लाइंट राहुल गांधी को पता है कि मोहनदास करमचंद गांधी ब्रिटिश वायसराय को लिखे हर खत के नीचे "आपका वफ़ादार सेवक" लिखते थे और अंग्रेजों से हर महीने ₹1200 सैलरी लेते थे.. तो क्या मोहनदास करमचंद गांधी को अंग्रेजों का सेवक माना जाएगा और फिर ये गांधी भी देश का गद्दार है.. ये सुनकर वकील मनु सिंघवी चुप हो गए.. अगर ये 12 चिट्ठियां सच हैं, तो गांधी पक्का गद्दा'र थे, अंग्रेजों के एजें"ट थे..

    10K5.0K525195298K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    On Independence day, remember what the Queen Of England Victoria said: "Brahmins are the real opponents of British rule. They instigate the people against us. Muslims are the real supporters of British rule. We (British) should side with the Muslims as their religion is very much opposed to Idol worship" This is the actual reason why anti-Brahmin hate got fueled into Indian society by Western powers, Christian missionaries and their Indian proxies.

    11K4.8K16982313K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    A prayer to god to grant @narendramodi ji long and a healthy life 🙏

    13K82720428101K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 202654x their median

    This book was published in 1916 by Benaras Hindu University... Not available now. All the copies got destroyed. One copy was available in the library of California University, which has been digitised by Microsoft. It is a beautiful introduction to Hinduism, without any school affiliations. It is especially suited to youth. You may go through at leisure. It has 304 pages and share it further with your known younger generation kids. This is a rare book on “Sanatana Dharma” - Please READ and share it to our youth group as much as possible... https://t.co/pKkRmqtP6d

    9.6K3.7K19166542K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    It’s always a joy to meet up with Magical and Mischievous Maverick MITHUN DADA ❤️ With love and respect 🙏 https://t.co/eY2APPZPuS

    11K4774212166K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 3.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.328%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 101K times each, and 10.6% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 47K interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.

What is Paresh Rawal's engagement rate on X?
Paresh Rawal (@SirPareshRawal) has an engagement rate of 0.328%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,249,167 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.328%, Paresh Rawal sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,027 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SirPareshRawal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SirPareshRawal post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going