Sidelines Sports Network™ engagement report
@Sidelines_SN - 118K followers on X
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.567% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 104x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #daveout, #fcs, #goblazers.
Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #daveout, #fcs, #goblazers.
Compared with accounts its own size
Sidelines Sports Network™'s engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Sidelines Sports Network™ sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 21% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 118 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 2026104x their median
Non-conference records vs. Power 4 teams SEC 10-2 Big 12 5-7 ACC 6-9 Big Ten 4-10 American 1-11 MAC 1-16 Mountain West 0-7 CUSA 0-8 Pac-12 0-12 Sun Belt 0-15
- Oct 3, 2026101x their median
Pregame at Houston’s TDECU Stadium. Ten minutes before kickoff. https://t.co/OsTHRzERDt
- Oct 3, 202610x their median
The Michigan 1 second, the Tulsa out of bounds TD, Hokies' field goal.... we're not even near the halfway point of the season and we've already seen some of the worst refereeing of all time
- Oct 3, 20268.5x their median
Story of the day: UMass will play in front of a sold out crowd with a chance to win 5 games in one season for the first time in their FBS history
- Oct 4, 20267.9x their median
Bummer ending for Raiders. I like it when they are good, NFL more fun, and I appreciate them not messing w their mascot/logo. Problem for them tho is Kirk Cousins tends to turn into Kirk Cousins at the worst possible time. No clutch gene.
- Oct 3, 20266.9x their median
Week 5 #FCS football final: 🚨UPSET ALERT🚨 The Citadel 34 No. 15 South Carolina State 31 Gavin Garcia (QB): 17 carries, 123 rushing yards, 7.2 YPC, 2 rushing TDs, 1 receiving TD https://t.co/Ssw0fyEnuI
- Oct 1, 20266.5x their median
𝘚𝘦𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘸… #GOBLAZERS🔥 https://t.co/dj2kccbJmW
- Oct 3, 20266.0x their median
College football is better when Virginia Tech is good
- Oct 2, 20261.6x their median
Sickos still up for UNT - Tulsa have been gifted overtime🔥 What a fun game this has been and oh boy the controversy of that TD catch if Tulsa pulls this out
- Oct 3, 2026
Rank Wake!
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.567% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 104x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #daveout, #fcs, #goblazers.
- What is Sidelines Sports Network™'s engagement rate on X?
- Sidelines Sports Network™ (@Sidelines_SN) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 117,960 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Sidelines Sports Network™ sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Sidelines_SN have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Sidelines_SN post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.