Back to @Sidelines_SN's profile

Sidelines Sports Network™ engagement report

@Sidelines_SN - 118K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 118K followers
Per impression
0.567%
2.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.567% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 104x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #daveout, #fcs, #goblazers.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #daveout, #fcs, #goblazers.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sidelines Sports Network™'s engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, Sidelines Sports Network™ sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video21% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 21% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 118 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 2026104x their median

    Non-conference records vs. Power 4 teams SEC 10-2 Big 12 5-7 ACC 6-9 Big Ten 4-10 American 1-11 MAC 1-16 Mountain West 0-7 CUSA 0-8 Pac-12 0-12 Sun Belt 0-15

    1.1K1278354236K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026101x their median

    Pregame at Houston’s TDECU Stadium. Ten minutes before kickoff. https://t.co/OsTHRzERDt

    94638210121474K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202610x their median

    The Michigan 1 second, the Tulsa out of bounds TD, Hokies' field goal.... we're not even near the halfway point of the season and we've already seen some of the worst refereeing of all time

    11712513.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20268.5x their median

    Story of the day: UMass will play in front of a sold out crowd with a chance to win 5 games in one season for the first time in their FBS history

    1033238.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20267.9x their median

    Bummer ending for Raiders. I like it when they are good, NFL more fun, and I appreciate them not messing w their mascot/logo. Problem for them tho is Kirk Cousins tends to turn into Kirk Cousins at the worst possible time. No clutch gene.

    63336135K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20266.9x their median

    Week 5 #FCS football final: 🚨UPSET ALERT🚨 The Citadel 34 No. 15 South Carolina State 31 Gavin Garcia (QB): 17 carries, 123 rushing yards, 7.2 YPC, 2 rushing TDs, 1 receiving TD https://t.co/Ssw0fyEnuI

    7114238.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20266.5x their median

    𝘚𝘦𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘵𝘰𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘰𝘸… #GOBLAZERS🔥 https://t.co/dj2kccbJmW

    3915427109K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20266.0x their median

    College football is better when Virginia Tech is good

    697114.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20261.6x their median

    Sickos still up for UNT - Tulsa have been gifted overtime🔥 What a fun game this has been and oh boy the controversy of that TD catch if Tulsa pulls this out

    181202.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 2026

    Rank Wake!

    101111.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#daveout#fcs#goblazers#memphis#uab

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 118K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 21% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.567% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 21% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 104x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #daveout, #fcs, #goblazers.

What is Sidelines Sports Network™'s engagement rate on X?
Sidelines Sports Network™ (@Sidelines_SN) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 117,960 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, Sidelines Sports Network™ sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sidelines_SN have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 21% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sidelines_SN post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going