Back to @Shteyngart's profile

Gary Shteyngart engagement report

@Shteyngart - 487K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 487K followers
Per impression
1.00%
6.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
67
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 487K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 49x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Gary Shteyngart's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, Gary Shteyngart sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.438%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,459 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,523 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.438%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-3%100K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-4%101K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-1%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%236K
Monday0%298K
Tuesday-3%295K
Wednesday-1%255K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%257K
Saturday+3%231K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 17, 202649x their median

    🚨WATCH: In another stunning statement, Trump just normalized Iran having a ballistic missile program: “In other words, they must have missiles to some degree, because others have them. When others have them, you need to have them too. There are people who say: 'It is forbidden to give them even one missile'. I have such people around me - I like some of them, but I don't think they are particularly smart. They say: 'We must not allow them to hold any missiles'. So I asked: What exactly are you proposing? That we allow Saudi Arabia to hold missiles, but not Iran? And they answered: 'Yes, sir'. It simply doesn't work that way. And missiles are not the real problem. Missiles can hit a specific target, but they do not destroy the world."

    1.9K476565395950K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202644x their median

    Una de las imágenes que hará perpetuar el ataque ucraniano de hoy a Moscú es la de la tapa de un depósito de combustible buscando huir hacia la estratósfera, para reunirse con las torres de los tanques que en 2022 intentaron tomar Ucrania Videos de @Exilenova_plus https://t.co/ObtEI64qke

    2.3K595772250K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202644x their median

    The president is now accusing the Senate of treason. https://t.co/Zc756GDF75

    1.8K6004349593K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 202633x their median

    Sources involved in the US-Iran negotiations say the American concessions are substantial. Trump's people have expressed de facto willingness to pay Iran for ship passage through the Strait of Hormuz, contrary to international norms. Iran says it has sold $18 billion in oil since the US blockade of the Strait of Oman was lifted. - Israel Hayom

    1.5K32223791639K viewsView on X
  • Oct 30, 201817x their median

    Wait, what the hell is happening now? Whatever it is, it's bullshit.

    9161368532View on X
  • Aug 2, 20262.4x their median

    One of the reasons I chose to live upstate are restaurants like @swoonkitchenbar which showed up in Hudson over two decades ago. They haven’t lost a beat. Insane fried artichokes, silky salmon pate, the best local cheeses, kimchi dumplings…it’s like coming home. https://t.co/toMtf5syI8

    14729115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.1x their median

    I cannot imagine the size of this cart. https://t.co/JarrYWKO4T

    1081415420K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 20261.9x their median

    Happy 4th from me and bernie. https://t.co/fQ31uxNqiC

    11311003.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20261.7x their median

    I did not like the Odyssey that much...

    10519129K viewsView on X
  • Jun 27, 20261.6x their median

    In the print version of the @nytimes today, me and my kid hit the road. https://t.co/Um5LDN6MCF

    958505.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 487K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.7K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 49x its own typical post.

What is Gary Shteyngart's engagement rate on X?
Gary Shteyngart (@Shteyngart) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 486,578 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, Gary Shteyngart sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Shteyngart have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Shteyngart post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going