Back to @Sheltieman3's profile

In the Name of Jesus engagement report

@Sheltieman3 - 153K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.041%
of 153K followers
Per impression
5.17%
1.2K views on a typical post
Reach
0.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
63
interactions (median)
Saved
0.082%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 63 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 5.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.798% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 764 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

In the Name of Jesus's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.041%, In the Name of Jesus sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 220 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 202612x their median

    Signs from Jesus for the nearness of the 7 year Tribulation: Deception. Check False Christs. Check Wars/rumors of wars. Check Nation against nation. Check Kingdom against kingdom Check Famines,diseases,earthquakes Check Christian persecution Check People offended. Check People hating one another. Check False prophets Check Lawlessness increasing. Check Love of many growing cold. Check Gospel preached worldwide. Check Hmmmm? 🤔

    521108128723K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202611x their median

    The rapture of the church could happen at any time. There are no signs to be fulfilled first. If we are seeing the signs of the Tribulation now, then the rapture is imminent. Are you ready? Are you born again? It will happen.

    467791641111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202611x their median

    Could it be possible for a serial killer to be saved?

    172164632518K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20267.0x their median

    What does Jesus tell us to do when the signs of the 7 year Tribulation begin to happen? “Now when these things begin to happen, look up and lift up your heads, because your redemption draws near.” Luke 21:28

    3644929211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20266.8x their median

    Will those who believe in God go to heaven?

    16714239118.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.9x their median

    Why is the church mentioned 19 times in Revelation chapters 1-3 and never again until Revelation 22:16?

    17817170418K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20264.5x their median

    Question: Is the 7 year Tribulation the wrath of God? For God did not appoint us to wrath, but to obtain salvation through our Lord Jesus Christ, 1 Thessalonians 5:9

    1162413965.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.4x their median

    The word “rapture” is not in the Bible. The word “Bible” is also not in the Bible. Hmmm 🤔

    1151714236.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.0x their median

    Should all people who came into the United States illegally and not through the legal way be deported?

    107117042.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.8x their median

    If we found the cure for cancer we would share that news with everyone. The most deadly disease is sin. We have the cure. Heartfelt faith and trust in Jesus cures the disease of sin and will cure those trusting in Him forever!

    121381521.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 63 interactions against 153K followers, an engagement rate of 0.041%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.2K times each, and 5.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.798% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 764 interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is In the Name of Jesus's engagement rate on X?
In the Name of Jesus (@Sheltieman3) has an engagement rate of 0.041%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 152,645 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.041%, In the Name of Jesus sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sheltieman3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sheltieman3 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going