Back to @Shekhawat_089's profile

Komal Rathore engagement report

@Shekhawat_089 - 209K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 209K followers
Per impression
5.56%
3.2K views on a typical post
Reach
1.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
176
interactions (median)
Saved
0.095%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.53/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 176 interactions against 209K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 5.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 251x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tag: #bleachtybw.

Compared with accounts its own size

Komal Rathore's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, Komal Rathore sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video73% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 169 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026251x their median

    Always book your flight tickets on a Tuesday at 3 AM in Incognito modeтАФairlines reset their algorithms overnight and drop unsold seats for 40% cheaper. тЬИя╕ПЁЯТ╕я┐╝ I just read that somewhere

    38K5.4K2221261.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202687x their median

    Wetin this Blaqbonez and Asake song go cause ehn, even Dj DimpleNipple don join the challengeЁЯШнЁЯШВЁЯФе https://t.co/HvQ0SyonLV

    14K1.2K445125554K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202663x their median

    The Reservoir is built around a simple principle: positioning matters. Vessels represent access. Positions create opportunity $RSV connects the ecosystem As The Reservoir develops, the role of $RSV becomes increasingly central to the experience The foundation is being built beneath the surface apply for whitelist: https://t.co/b2Iikpws6p

    3.6K2.9K2.0K2.5K118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202613x their median

    My sister and this guy were in the talking stage for about three months. She was always on her phone because of him. Late-night chats. Early-morning calls. Video calls. тАЬHave you eaten?тАЭ тАЬWhat did you eat?тАЭ Sometimes, they would chat till midnight, then pray together online. Last week, the guy finally told her he was in love with her and wanted them to start dating. My sister bluntly told him she wasnтАЩt ready for a relationship. She wanted to focus on God and her career. The guy appreciated her honesty, thanked her for the time they spent together, and BLOCKED HER EVERYWHERE. My sister has been crying since last week. And according to her, sheтАЩs not crying because she lost a boyfriend. SheтАЩs crying because after everything they shared, the guy didnтАЩt even make an effort to fight for what they had. He simply accepted her decision and disappeared. No begging. No persuasion. No тАЬplease reconsider.тАЭ No тАЬIтАЩll wait for you.тАЭ Nothing. Honestly, this thing is confusing me. If a man genuinely loves you, should he accept тАЬIтАЩm not readyтАЭ and walk away, or should he fight, persist and try to change your mind? Be honest.

    1.1K155766229138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202612x their median

    рдЖрдЬ рдореЗрд░реЗ 200K рдлрд╝реЙрд▓реЛрдЕрд░реНрд╕ рдкреВрд░реЗ рд╣реБрдП рд╣реИрдВ... тЭдя╕ПЁЯОВрдореИрдВрдиреЗ рд╣рдореЗрд╢рд╛ рд╣рд░ рдЫреЛрдЯреЗ-рдмрдбрд╝реЗ рдХреНрд░рд┐рдПрдЯрд░ рдХрд╛ рд╕рдореНрдорд╛рди рдХрд┐рдпрд╛, рд╕рдмрдХреЛ рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рдкрд░рд┐рд╡рд╛рд░ рдХреА рддрд░рд╣ рдЬреЛрдбрд╝рд╛ рдФрд░ рдХрднреА рдХрд┐рд╕реА рдХреЛ рдХрдо рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╕рдордЭрд╛ред рдЖрдЬ 200K рдХрд╛ рдпрд╣ рдЦреВрдмрд╕реВрд░рдд рд╕рдлрд╝рд░ рдЖрдк рд╕рднреА рдХреЗ рдкреНрдпрд╛рд░, рд╕рдкреЛрд░реНрдЯ рдФрд░ рд╡рд┐рд╢реНрд╡рд╛рд╕ рдХреА рд╡рдЬрд╣ рд╕реЗ рдкреВрд░рд╛ рд╣реБрдЖ рд╣реИред ЁЯе╣тЭдя╕П рдореЗрд░реЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдпреЗ рд╕рд┐рд░реНрдлрд╝ 200K рдлрд╝реЙрд▓реЛрдЕрд░реНрд╕ рдирд╣реАрдВ, рдмрд▓реНрдХрд┐ 200K рд░рд┐рд╢реНрддреЗ, рджреБрдЖрдПрдБ рдФрд░ рдкреНрдпрд╛рд░ рд╣реИрдВред рдореИрдВ рдЖрдЬ рднреА рд░рд┐рд╢реНрддреЛрдВ рдХреЛ рд╕рд┐рд░реНрдлрд╝ рдлрд╝реЙрд▓реЛрдЕрд░реНрд╕ рдХреА рд╕рдВрдЦреНрдпрд╛ рд╕реЗ рдХрд╣реАрдВ рдЬрд╝реНрдпрд╛рджрд╛ рдЕрд╣рдорд┐рдпрдд рджреЗрддреА рд╣реВрдБред тЭдя╕П рдЕрдЧрд░ рдЖрдкрдиреЗ рдЗрд╕ рд╕рдлрд╝рд░ рдореЗрдВ рдореЗрд░рд╛ рд╕рд╛рде рджрд┐рдпрд╛ рд╣реИ, рддреЛ 200K рдХреА рдПрдХ рдЫреЛрдЯреА-рд╕реА рдмрдзрд╛рдИ рдореЗрд░реЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдЗрд╕ рдЦрд╝рд╛рд╕ рдкрд▓ рдХреЛ рдФрд░ рднреА рдпрд╛рджрдЧрд╛рд░ рдмрдирд╛ рджреЗрдЧреАред ЁЯОЙЁЯеВ рдЖрдкрдХрд╛ рдПрдХ рдкреНрдпрд╛рд░ рднрд░рд╛ рд╕рдВрджреЗрд╢ рдореЗрд░реЗ рд▓рд┐рдП рдХрд┐рд╕реА рднреА рддреЛрд╣рдлрд╝реЗ рд╕реЗ рдмрдврд╝рдХрд░ рд╣реЛрдЧрд╛ред тЭдя╕ПЁЯл╢ 200K рдкрд░рд┐рд╡рд╛рд░тАж рджрд┐рд▓ рд╕реЗ рд╢реБрдХреНрд░рд┐рдпрд╛! ЁЯе╣тЭдя╕П рдпрд╣ рд╕рдлрд╝рд░ рдЕрднреА рд▓рдВрдмрд╛ рд╣реИ, рдФрд░ рдЙрдореНрдореАрдж рд╣реИ рдЖрдк рд╕рдм рдпреВрдБ рд╣реА рд╕рд╛рде рд░рд╣реЗрдВрдЧреЗред ЁЯдЭтЬи

    1.4K3404061744K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20265.7x their median

    ЁЯШ▒ "I'm hearing 60 point deduction!" ЁЯШм "A lot of people wouldn't think that's enough!" Alan Brazil reveals Man City could be looking at a 60 point deduction according to sources from Manchester https://t.co/yuxS26mgc7

    6427725042263K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.4x their median

    Community Rankings are now live on Nucleus! Top communities will receive exclusive benefits from Nucleus opportunities, along with additional perks for their members. You can only choose one community, so pick carefully which project you want to support. To set your community, visit the Accounts tab on your profile ЁЯСЗ https://t.co/JEbMo3Cm1H

    376411484262K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.8x their median

    рдЬрд┐рд╕ рдЗрдВрд╕рд╛рди рдХреЗ рдорди рдореЗрдВ рд╕рддреНрдп рдФрд░ рднрдХреНрддрд┐ рдХреА рд▓реМ рдЬрд▓рддреА рд╣реИ, рдЙрд╕реЗ рдЬреАрд╡рди рдХрд╛ рдХреЛрдИ рднреА рдмрдбрд╝рд╛ рд╕реЗ рдмрдбрд╝рд╛ рддреВрдлрд╝рд╛рди рдпрд╛ рд╕рдВрдХрдЯ рдбрд┐рдЧрд╛ рдирд╣реАрдВ рд╕рдХрддрд╛, рдЕрдкрдиреЗ рд╡рд┐рд╢реНрд╡рд╛рд╕ рдХреЛ рд╣рдореЗрд╢рд╛ рдмрдирд╛рдП рд░рдЦрд┐рдП! ЁЯзЦЁЯП╗ GOOD morning ЁЯПЪя╕ПтШХЁЯПЪя╕П https://t.co/EgPxeDA9ZY

    3006612524.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20261.7x their median

    рдпреЗ рддреАрдиреЛрдВ рд╣реЛрдирд╣рд╛рд░ рднрд╛рдИ рдХрд░рдирд╛рд▓ рдХреА рдзрд░рддреА рд╕реЗ рд╣реИрдВ, рдЬрд┐рдиреНрд╣реЛрдВрдиреЗ Guinness World Records рдореЗрдВ рдЕрдкрдирд╛ рдирд╛рдо рджрд░реНрдЬ рдХрд░рд╛рдХрд░ рдкреВрд░реЗ рдкрд░рд┐рд╡рд╛рд░ рдФрд░ рдХрд░рдирд╛рд▓ рдХрд╛ рдирд╛рдо рд░реЛрд╢рди рдХрд┐рдпрд╛ рд╣реИред тЭдя╕ПЁЯПЖ рдЧреБрд▓рд╛рдмреА рдХреБрд░реНрддреЗ рдореЗрдВ рдЙрдирдХреЗ рдкрд┐рддрд╛ рд╢реНрд░реА рд╣реИрдВ, рдЬрд┐рдирдХреЗ рд╕рдВрд╕реНрдХрд╛рд░, рдореЗрд╣рдирдд рдФрд░ рдЖрд╢реАрд░реНрд╡рд╛рдж рдЗрдирдХреА рд╕рдлрд▓рддрд╛ рдХреЗ рдкреАрдЫреЗ рд╕рдмрд╕реЗ рдмрдбрд╝реА рддрд╛рдХрдд рд╣реИрдВред ЁЯзЦЁЯП╗тЭдя╕П рдкреВрд░реЗ рдкрд░рд┐рд╡рд╛рд░ рдХреЛ рдЗрд╕ рдРрддрд┐рд╣рд╛рд╕рд┐рдХ рдЙрдкрд▓рдмреНрдзрд┐ рдкрд░ рд╣рд╛рд░реНрджрд┐рдХ рдмрдзрд╛рдИ рдПрд╡рдВ рд╢реБрднрдХрд╛рдордирд╛рдПрдБред ЁЯЗоЁЯЗ│тЬи

    197692764.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    рдЬрдп рдЧрдгреЗрд╢ рджреЗрд╡рд╛ рдХреА рдЬрдп рд╣реЛ рдкрд░рднреБ рд▓рд╛рдЬ рд░рдЦрдирд╛ рд╕рд░ рдкрд░ рд╣рд╛рде рд░рдЦрдирд╛ рдЬрдп рд╣реЛ !! ЁЯзЦЁЯП╗ https://t.co/qVjLMnOUyH

    160503521.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bleachtybw

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 176 interactions against 209K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.2K times each, and 5.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 251x its own typical post.

What is Komal Rathore's engagement rate on X?
Komal Rathore (@Shekhawat_089) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 208,543 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, Komal Rathore sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Shekhawat_089 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Shekhawat_089 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going