Back to @ShannonSharpe's profile

shannon sharpe engagement report

@ShannonSharpe - 2.0M followers on X

Measured over 112 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 2.0M followers
Per impression
0.643%
70K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
450
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
10.2/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 112 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 0.643% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 112 posts sampled, 9% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 54x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nightcap, #s.

Measured over 112 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #nightcap, #s.

Compared with accounts its own size

shannon sharpe's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, shannon sharpe sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link36% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 94 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 202654x their median

    With the legend @RealSkipBayless. Miss you my brotha! On set for our new @Polymarket commercial airing soon. More news coming soon 🤫 https://t.co/1YlpgHN75E

    21K1.6K6904722.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202644x their median

    Need a pick from Tua.

    19K602273138683K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202623x their median

    I would’ve trusted Stafford. Don’t trust this kicker

    9.8K50215846246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202623x their median

    Welp @NightcapShow_ went Outside & look like we goin RIGHT BACK IN! 🔥 What a quick demonstration laid down by @RyanGarcia 🥊😮‍💨 Catch us going live tonight 2 talk all about it! https://t.co/DTrhf7ffyu

    9.5K5777329294K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202619x their median

    "Women like that, too. ... If any woman tell you she don't like stuff like that, she just don't like you. If the right man comes along, she's going to do all of those things." - @TacarraComedian https://t.co/iGURgZhs4E

    7.4K647205196425K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202619x their median

    Dirty A** play by 93 of the 49ers. That’s bush league . Could really injure that man. 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬

    7.8K38819836460K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202618x their median

    Can’t even lie. It’s painful watching the Buffs. 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

    7.2K370437133680K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202617x their median

    Are Eagles coaches really this incompetent? 4th and 2 you don’t go, but 4th and 5 is the right time. 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

    6.9K52015075186K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202616x their median

    Maye, what did you just do? Better question, WHY?

    6.9K29911623194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202615x their median

    It’s time 4 Humphrey 2 move 2 safety. He no longer possesses the twitch 2 be on that island. He and Wiggins leaves a lot 2 be desired.

    6.2K3769957257K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nightcap#s

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 450 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 112 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 70K times each, and 0.643% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 112 posts sampled, 9% are part of a thread and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 54x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nightcap, #s.

What is shannon sharpe's engagement rate on X?
shannon sharpe (@ShannonSharpe) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 112 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,034,842 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, shannon sharpe sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ShannonSharpe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ShannonSharpe post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 10.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going