Back to @ShakurStevenson's profile

Shakur Stevenson engagement report

@ShakurStevenson - 337K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.384%
of 337K followers
Per impression
1.05%
124K views on a typical post
Reach
36.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
53 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.23/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 337K followers, an engagement rate of 0.384%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 124K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tag: #him.

Compared with accounts its own size

Shakur Stevenson's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.384%, Shakur Stevenson sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,656 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,418 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 137 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 20268.1x their median

    UFC fighter King Green just pulled up to boxer Arnold Barbozaโ€™s gym and got the work ๐Ÿ˜ฌ โ€œI didnโ€™t know I was going with a real champion. F*ck! He socked the sh*t out of me chat.โ€ https://t.co/546yf2JB8Y

    9.9K277194611.5M viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20265.3x their median

    145.0 U GOT A DEAL DEEHOE!!!!

    5.6K700438228459K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.4x their median

    I remember when I was younger I felt as if I had to prove everyone wrong all the time. Iโ€™ve learned along the way that thatโ€™s never possible. Thereโ€™s just people in the world no matter what you do or who you beat that never going to give you credit and Iโ€™m fine with that now.

    4.7K63833848276K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20264.1x their median

    Unbelievable Talent and skills, Heโ€™s young and will be a champion one day if he learn from that.. He throws every punch at 100mph and that can be a gift and a curse, Especially in the heavyweights division!!

    4.8K41510332164K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20264.0x their median

    ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿ˜ˆ @Realdevinhaney LETS GO!!!!

    3.8K538446306607K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.4x their median

    Floyd say Iโ€™m his son my new name baby money ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ’ฐ๐Ÿ’ฐ

    3.2K1837123901.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.1x their median

    Great performance Ryan, Great effort Conor benn nothing but respect to both guys tonight!

    3.7K1309210104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.0x their median

    Shakur in the gym with Mayweather ๐Ÿ˜ค https://t.co/dO3aMOI9n0

    3.4K3376478786K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.9x their median

    Respect to Rolly a champion who will fight anybody Respect champ!!!

    3.5K19410219109K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.9x their median

    Gary Antuanne Russell letโ€™s unify โ˜Ž๏ธ โ˜Ž๏ธโ˜Ž๏ธ

    2.8K388373213349K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#him

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 337K followers, an engagement rate of 0.384%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 124K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 36.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post.

What is Shakur Stevenson's engagement rate on X?
Shakur Stevenson (@ShakurStevenson) has an engagement rate of 0.384%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 337,433 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.384%, Shakur Stevenson sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,656 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ShakurStevenson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ShakurStevenson post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going