Back to @SethDillon's profile

Seth Dillon engagement report

@SethDillon - 884K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.327%
of 884K followers
Per impression
2.64%
109K views on a typical post
Reach
12.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
76 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.67/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 884K followers, an engagement rate of 0.327%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 395K interactions, about 219x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Seth Dillon's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.327%, Seth Dillon sits above the 50th percentile of the 203,650 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.676%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.676%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 203,650 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.676%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 300 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 2025219x their median

    Jesus defeated death so you can live.

    304K79K5.9K6.3K28M viewsView on X
  • May 19, 202364x their median

    https://t.co/1QI79e1XTK

    165K13K5.7K69716M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202644x their median

    BREAKING: ABC just DELETED their tweet after they were ratioed into oblivion, community noted and called out by @elonmusk directly for trying to deceive the public about a drunk driver who crashed her Tesla This is how it’s done! They aren’t used to accountability. The lying from the fake news legacy media doesn’t work anymore!

    108K18K1.4K5362.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202612x their median

    The Trump government could have used Charlie Kirk’s assassination to annihilate antifa, the Far Left and kneecap the DSA. Now, the same Leftist garbage that openly celebrated his horrific murder will be the sole beneficiaries since Kirk was eliminated & the Right devoured itself

    32K2.3K1.2K1611.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.0x their median

    If your country has to issue brochures warning new migrants, mostly Muslim, that sex without consent is called rape and that you shouldn’t genitally mutilate female babies…perhaps the solutions was not to admit them to your civilization in the first place. https://t.co/0VdDiYksM0

    21K3.6K1.3K143734K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20239.8x their median

    I’m excited to announce the launch of the official Women for Trump Coalition! President Trump is a champion for the dignity of women and trusts the science: there are only TWO genders Male & Female. He also believes women are exclusively FEMALE. JOIN: https://t.co/apd4pk9ovY

    11K1.9K5.0K310481K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.8x their median

    Stop calling it "criticism." Erika hasn't merely been criticized. She's been accused of playing a role in her own husband's murder. She's been viciously attacked and maliciously slandered by shameless grifters who enjoy, and profit from, her suffering. And that's not hyperbole. Candace admitted that she relishes Erika's pain and hopes it never ends: "I want Erika to outlive everyone. Long live Erika Frantzve. Death is easy. Living a long life when everybody knows who and what you are, what you were a part of, and what you did . . . Long live Erika Frantzve." Calling this criticism is like calling torture discipline.

    6.8K8564144193K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.7x their median

    Racists hate adoption because it blows their entire worldview to smithereens. I know a family who adopted a kid from the Congo. He’s a hillbilly with a southern accent who loves Jesus and loves deer hunting. Aside from his looks, indistinguishable from his family and community. They have a daughter they adopted from Ethiopia. She now teaches at a university. The “DNA is destiny” crowd has no answer to this except to seethe. Adoption is a beautiful picture of what Christ did for us. That’s why Satan and his minions hate it.

    5.1K3491.9K3663.4M viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 20264.3x their median

    It takes a truly sick individual to bring an illegal alien squatter like Milo Yiannopoulos into their home and around their children, but that is exactly what Candace Owens @RealCandaceO is doing just to manufacture fake smears against me and other real conservatives! While Milo was illegally squatting in a foreclosed house, he spun up a sob story claiming his rare, expensive designer cat had mysteriously gone missing. In reality, I was told by people close to the situation that he allegedly sold the poor animal for over a thousand dollars just to fund his documented drug use while he was squatting in Dov Charney’s home in Los Angeles, according to court records. Now, Milo is facing deportation proceedings according to a source of mine familiar with his immigration issues. What kind of soulless, heartless monster sells a helpless, innocent pet just to get high? It is completely inhumane and demonic, yet this is the exact type of degenerate Candace proudly allies herself with!

    6.2K999439371.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.7x their median

    They don't just think about murdering their kids all the time, they also joke about it for engagement. Ticktok is turning countless mothers into monsters. https://t.co/4CdGcmKLBa

    5.7K928836236743K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.9K interactions against 884K followers, an engagement rate of 0.327%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 109K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 395K interactions, about 219x its own typical post.

What is Seth Dillon's engagement rate on X?
Seth Dillon (@SethDillon) has an engagement rate of 0.327%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 884,416 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.327%, Seth Dillon sits above the 50th percentile of the 203,650 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SethDillon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SethDillon post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going