Seth Abramson engagement report
@SethAbramson - 829K followers on X
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 642 interactions against 829K followers, an engagement rate of 0.077%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.
Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #voteblue.
Compared with accounts its own size
Seth Abramson's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.077%, Seth Abramson sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 65% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 38% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 65% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 38% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 236 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 28, 202640x their median
The outrage over Trump changing names is hilarious when you look at the facts. Barack Obama renamed Mount McKinley to Denali in 2015. Joe Biden renamed Fort Bragg to Fort Liberty, Fort Benning to Fort Moore, Fort Hood to Fort Cavazos, Fort Gordon to Fort Eisenhower, Fort Lee to Fort Gregg-Adams, Fort Polk to Fort Johnson, Fort Rucker to Fort Novosel, Fort A.P. Hill to Fort Walker, Fort Pickett to Fort Barfoot, and Clingmans Dome to Kuwohi. His administration also stripped Confederate names and symbols from military property. Donald Trump renamed Denali back to Mount McKinley, renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, restored the old Army base names, and reversed the monument purge. But when Trump changes a few names, suddenly everyone is having a five-alarm freaking meltdown. Give me a break. You do not actually care about name changes. You care because Orange Man Bad. 🥱
- Aug 28, 202636x their median
Trump vs Mark Carney. Welcome to Canada 🇨🇦 Prompt in the commetns ⬇️ https://t.co/wDHqCsqodI
- Aug 28, 202621x their median
Al Michaels mocked President Trump and America during tonight’s NFL preseason Thursday Night Football game on Amazon, featuring the Cleveland Browns vs. the New England Patriots. Michaels shamelessly said: “That is Lake Erie. We think it is still called Lake Erie. We’re not quite sure at this point. But we’ll be by Lake something like Ontario or whatever it’s going to be called by the time we get to Buffalo. Anyway, you know what I’m talking about… Read the news.” NFL fans don’t want to watch Trump-hating, America-last announcers. Al Michaels must apologize.
- Aug 22, 202620x their median
There's not going to be forgiveness this time. Nor mercy. Just justice as the Constitution intended. Scores of millions of Americans are never going to forget or forgive what's happening, and will demand severe punishment for it. These people are monsters. https://t.co/wkuQAJjUqa
- Sep 26, 202612x their median
Trump: "I'm rejecting their deal. They want to make a deal where they open the strait immediately ... we're winning tremendously. We have total control of the Hormuz Strait ... that deal would not be acceptable. They want to immediately open the Hormuz Strait." https://t.co/iqlz69Wsz2
- Sep 5, 202610.0x their median
The course of human history would have unfolded differently if—the first time that fat orange failson launched a con—the rule of law had come down on him like Fury fucking incarnate. Cowardice. The spinelessness of thousands of people and hundreds of institutions led us here.
- Aug 18, 20269.1x their median
Jon Ossoff is free to criticize President Trump. That’s politics. But bringing White House aide Natalie Harp into the attack was his choice, and a revealing one. Harp is a 35-year-old cancer survivor who works in the White House. Ossoff chose to make her part of an anti-Trump attack because he thought it would score points with the Democrat base and generate attention. It did. Just not the kind of attention he was hoping for. https://t.co/6FKU4pxXSY
- Aug 27, 20267.9x their median
The argument that Trump invaded Canada today is more compelling than many realize. The border between Canada and the U.S. runs through the middle of Lake Ontario. By claiming to have the power to rename the entire lake, Trump is claiming the lake. That's invasion by declaration.
- Sep 8, 20266.7x their median
On Trump’s latest 9/11 story: - He was miles away from the World Trade Center on 9/11, at Trump Tower - There’s no evidence he was whisked out of any building; in 2016 he claimed he was “not so far” from a building thought to be unstable, didn't hint he was inside - There’s no public evidence he organized a Ground Zero rescue crew, let alone the 100-strong crew he has previously claimed - Rescue workers repeatedly did run away from the building he was referring to, One Liberty Plaza, over collapse fears that proved unfounded. Trump discussed these rushes in one Sept. 13, 2001 interview but didn’t say he was personally swept up in one, though it’s theoretically possible - One Liberty Plaza does not “still creak.” It was closed for less than two months and has been functioning for nearly 25 years now https://t.co/3pvUXxJ3bg
- Sep 4, 20266.2x their median
Hey, out of curiosity, why are we calling this a "foothold" instead of an illegal invasion, annexation and occupation? We're still doing journalism, right? And "foothold" makes it sound like Israel is just a scrappy little tyke trying to make its way in the world like a big boy? https://t.co/5hY9TnCW7J
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 642 interactions against 829K followers, an engagement rate of 0.077%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 2.32% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 65% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 38% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 40x its own typical post.
- What is Seth Abramson's engagement rate on X?
- Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) has an engagement rate of 0.077%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 829,044 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.077%, Seth Abramson sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SethAbramson have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SethAbramson post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.07 posts per day across the measured window.