Back to @SethAbramson's profile

Seth Abramson engagement report

@SethAbramson - 830K followers on X

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.112%
of 830K followers
Per impression
3.16%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
3.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
928
interactions (median)
Saved
0.066%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.77/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 928 interactions against 830K followers, an engagement rate of 0.112%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 3.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 38 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Seth Abramson's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.112%, Seth Abramson sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.434%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202628x their median

    The outrage over Trump changing names is hilarious when you look at the facts. Barack Obama renamed Mount McKinley to Denali in 2015. Joe Biden renamed Fort Bragg to Fort Liberty, Fort Benning to Fort Moore, Fort Hood to Fort Cavazos, Fort Gordon to Fort Eisenhower, Fort Lee to Fort Gregg-Adams, Fort Polk to Fort Johnson, Fort Rucker to Fort Novosel, Fort A.P. Hill to Fort Walker, Fort Pickett to Fort Barfoot, and Clingmans Dome to Kuwohi. His administration also stripped Confederate names and symbols from military property. Donald Trump renamed Denali back to Mount McKinley, renamed the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, restored the old Army base names, and reversed the monument purge. But when Trump changes a few names, suddenly everyone is having a five-alarm freaking meltdown. Give me a break. You do not actually care about name changes. You care because Orange Man Bad. 🥱

    19K4.6K1.8K232697K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202625x their median

    Trump vs Mark Carney. Welcome to Canada 🇨🇦 Prompt in the commetns ⬇️ https://t.co/wDHqCsqodI

    19K2.9K9152953.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202615x their median

    Al Michaels mocked President Trump and America during tonight’s NFL preseason Thursday Night Football game on Amazon, featuring the Cleveland Browns vs. the New England Patriots. Michaels shamelessly said: “That is Lake Erie. We think it is still called Lake Erie. We’re not quite sure at this point. But we’ll be by Lake something like Ontario or whatever it’s going to be called by the time we get to Buffalo. Anyway, you know what I’m talking about… Read the news.” NFL fans don’t want to watch Trump-hating, America-last announcers. Al Michaels must apologize.

    3.9K3999.0K4901.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202614x their median

    There's not going to be forgiveness this time. Nor mercy. Just justice as the Constitution intended. Scores of millions of Americans are never going to forget or forgive what's happening, and will demand severe punishment for it. These people are monsters. https://t.co/wkuQAJjUqa

    8.9K3.4K277120170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.3x their median

    Jon Ossoff is free to criticize President Trump. That’s politics. But bringing White House aide Natalie Harp into the attack was his choice, and a revealing one. Harp is a 35-year-old cancer survivor who works in the White House. Ossoff chose to make her part of an anti-Trump attack because he thought it would score points with the Democrat base and generate attention. It did. Just not the kind of attention he was hoping for. https://t.co/6FKU4pxXSY

    3.4K7731.6K124757K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.4x their median

    The argument that Trump invaded Canada today is more compelling than many realize. The border between Canada and the U.S. runs through the middle of Lake Ontario. By claiming to have the power to rename the entire lake, Trump is claiming the lake. That's invasion by declaration.

    3.9K90317660127K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.2x their median

    Sec. Kennedy on measles deaths in Pennsylvania: “We're doing a better job than any country in the world at controlling the measles outbreak. This is a worldwide epidemic, and it's happening because of the lockdowns, because many kids did not get vaccinated during the lockdowns.” https://t.co/mU5Tk1Ta2K

    9942942.0K669837K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20264.1x their median

    Thing #1 that you *do not do* for a psychopath: appease them https://t.co/ZSXgeRgxLT

    3.4K38770992K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.1x their median

    I gotta say, Jon Ossoff is getting more negative press for noting that Trump enjoys traveling with the one aide who (as he's remarked) actually cares deeply about him—a fact Trump wouldn't even deny—than Trump has ever gotten for calling for his political opponents to be executed

    3.2K48454442K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.5x their median

    This is a walking security risk, I cannot actually believe this person is allowed anywhere near the President of the United States https://t.co/p3y1vK2T7n

    2.3K7132287368K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 928 interactions against 830K followers, an engagement rate of 0.112%. Measured over 38 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 3,791 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 3.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 38 posts sampled, 61% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is Seth Abramson's engagement rate on X?
Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) has an engagement rate of 0.112%, based on the median interactions across 38 original posts from the last 30 days against 830,270 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.112%, Seth Abramson sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SethAbramson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,791 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SethAbramson post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going