Back to @Serranosisters's profile

Amanda Serrano engagement report

@Serranosisters - 182K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.108%
of 182K followers
Per impression
3.06%
6.4K views on a typical post
Reach
3.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
196
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.108%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 3.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026. Recurring tag: #jakepaul.

Compared with accounts its own size

Amanda Serrano's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.108%, Amanda Serrano sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,259 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 347 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 25, 201979x their median

    3 Different Sports 1 Outcome I’m Blessed! https://t.co/SnTvgv55rp

    13K1.2K730178View on X
  • Sep 5, 202645x their median

    In a few Minutes @KatieTaylor makes her final ring walk, a True Legend The Woman that made it Possible for Olympic Medals to be Contested & Won. The REAL GWOAT without disrespecting any other. Thank you for Sharing 30 amazing rds with me ❤️ Katie GOD BLESS you Always! 🙏

    8.3K38514424210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202613x their median

    Im sorry he may not be a fan of mine but I love his Skills, his Heart and he’s a cutie @RyanGarcia lol

    2.4K598922313K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202612x their median

    We Delivered! Woman Can Fight! (Fan Requested Trilogy) Women Can Sell! (Sold out The Garden 2X’s) We Inspired plenty, now it’s time to sit back & Enjoy what we help build. Congratulations @KatieTaylor You were Born for this 🙏❤️ https://t.co/GA0I0VFue7

    2.2K12623058K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202611x their median

    Thank You guys for all the Birthday wishes. Love you All 🙏😘❤️ https://t.co/eZ4254fHwW

    2.0K75142541K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202610x their median

    Giving someone other than yourself their Flowers is what everyone should do. @KatieTaylor is and will always be a true Legend. I was Honored to have shared the Ring with her 3 times. https://t.co/goBCqGap8r

    1.7K1671132563K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.4x their median

    I’m sorry but I’m where I want to be Rich & Ready to Retire Not worried about Drama, save it for someone who Cares 😝 Rahhhhhh lmao 🤣 https://t.co/eQibKvrKH1

    1.0K711142735K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.3x their median

    Wow this was rough! lol Honesty the mind tells you one thing but the body does another. You can fight anyone you want and squeeze out a victory but Father Time isn’t allowing to much of that. Thank you so much to All my fans you guys are amazing. You’re the reason why I dug in deep tonight. I’ll talk to the team and make my decision. I love you All 🙏❤️

    998751461491K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.4x their median

    God is Great! When what you’ve built came from the Heart and with Hard work nothing can stop it. The Best is yet to come! I’ll tell you now Believe me Later 😉💋 https://t.co/nKgnYOCInu

    9416754231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.5x their median

    To @KatieTaylor From @Serranosisters ✍️ Amanda sends her well wishes to KT in the build-up to Saturday 👏 https://t.co/670hQZf6v4

    73294362164K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#jakepaul

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 196 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.108%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 3.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

What is Amanda Serrano's engagement rate on X?
Amanda Serrano (@Serranosisters) has an engagement rate of 0.108%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 181,571 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.108%, Amanda Serrano sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,259 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Serranosisters have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Serranosisters post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going