Back to @SeoldamTwit's profile

Seoldam engagement report

@SeoldamTwit - 213K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.031%
of 213K followers
Per impression
0.251%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
12.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
67
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 158K interactions, about 600x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Seoldam's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.031%, Seoldam sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link83% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 51 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 17, 2025600x their median

    𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤 𝐲𝐨𝐮, 𝐆𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐲𝐮𝐬𝐢 'Gumayusi' 이민형 선수가 T1을 떠나 새로운 도전을 시작하게 되었습니다. 함께한 시간 동안 들어 올린 트로피와 'Gumayusi' 선수가 남긴 발자취는 팀과 팬들의 마음에 오래도록 빛날 것입니다. T1은 'Gumayusi' 선수의 헌신과 희생, 그리고 눈부신 활약에 대해 깊은 존경과 감사함을 표합니다. 새롭게 펼쳐질 'Gumayusi' 선수의 여정에 행운이 가득하기 바라며, T1은 변함없는 지지와 응원을 보내겠습니다. ‘Gumayusi’ has concluded his time with T1 as he moves forward to take on a new challenge. The trophies we lifted together and the legacy he built will always be a proud part of our history and in the hearts of our fans. We are deeply grateful for his dedication, sacrifice, and incredible performances throughout his years with us. As he begins this next chapter, we’ll continue to cheer for him and wish him every success ahead.

    99K25K4.3K30K25M viewsView on X
  • Jan 1, 202694x their median

    [ RIDDLEORDER - #VALORANT ] この度、下記3名がRIDDLEから脱退し、DetonatioN FocusMe(@DFM_VALORANT)へ移籍する運びとなりました✔ ・Caedye(@CaedyeuS ) ・yatsuka(@yatsuka_07) ・Vorz(@v6rzu) 2023年のVALORANT部門発足時から共に歩み、日本4連覇という最高の結果を導いてくれた3名にチーム一同心からの感謝を送ります。 Good luck in your next chapter ツ

    21K3.2K505082.7M viewsView on X
  • Jan 10, 202674x their median

    ONCE MORE, ON TOP https://t.co/HnoRIYcx0d

    16K3.1K467392.7M viewsView on X
  • Jan 1, 202630x their median

    RIDDLEのVALOの初期メンバー僕しかいない

    7.8K1262314583K viewsView on X
  • Nov 30, 202521x their median

    人生最悪の瞬間と人生最高の瞬間 2vs5 1vs5 https://t.co/QamHCHljwd

    5.3K3141132333K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202676x their median

    🫪 https://t.co/uY1eaJXvQx

    4.9K1191824472K viewsView on X
  • Jan 25, 202671x their median

    https://t.co/zQMF4w3i4D

    4.6K148911326K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202667x their median

    LFT Main : duelist どんなロールでも練習でき、挑戦者のマインドで学ぶ姿勢で取り組みます。 https://t.co/b08xdBX6s7 Agency: [email protected] Discord : rio_steven

    4.0K445830341K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 202666x their median

    seoldam先生はネオンに留まらずお笑いをできます https://t.co/19ATaCmbDo

    4.3K167418849K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 202666x their median

    RIDDLE 2026 JERSEY https://t.co/rajyyd0GbM

    3.8K447141392.4M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 67 interactions against 213K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 158K interactions, about 600x its own typical post.

What is Seoldam's engagement rate on X?
Seoldam (@SeoldamTwit) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 213,220 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.031%, Seoldam sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SeoldamTwit have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SeoldamTwit post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going