Sen. Elissa Slotkin engagement report
@SenatorSlotkin - 159K followers on X
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 177 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Sen. Elissa Slotkin's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.113%, Sen. Elissa Slotkin sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 71% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 24% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 313 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 15, 20267.5x their median
The law is clear. But we need it in writing. From Secretary Hegseth, Secretary Mullin, Attorney General Blanche and others. No troops or federal agents should be deployed to polls. Period. https://t.co/jMq4BDqkIp
- Sep 13, 20267.3x their median
I wanted to hear very clearly from Secretary Hegseth and from the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs that they would not respond to an illegal order and deploy the uniformed military at polling locations. Chairman Caine came back and said that very clearly. We've heard nothing from Secretary Hegseth, and this should be a very easy thing for a Secretary of Defense to say.
- Sep 9, 20265.9x their median
Mail-in voting is safe and secure. The Constitution gives Congress and the states authority over federal elections. Not the President. It’s why I joined my colleagues in filing a brief challenging President Trump’s executive order and the USPS rule seeking to control how mail-in ballots are handled. Read more: https://t.co/DCB5ubTuhh
- Sep 18, 20264.5x their median
For months, we have known that Chinese companies are helping the Iranian military target and attempt to kill U.S. troops. New reporting now shows that this support from China may have directly contributed to the deaths of American servicemembers. The provision of targeting information by China to help Iran kill American servicemembers should be something even President Trump cannot tolerate. https://t.co/o7kMtUC2gg
- Sep 17, 20263.7x their median
As always, watch what the President does, not what he says. If the President of BYD comes with the Chinese President to the White House next week, we can only assume there are deals afoot to allow Chinese cars to be imported, or Chinese companies are being invited to set up shop in the U.S. President Trump said that he would welcome Chinese car companies as recently as last week. That would be a terrible outcome for Michigan and the 1.2 million jobs in our state associated with the auto industry. The Chinese have been working for years to get that first foothold into the U.S. market. Chinese car companies are propped up by the Chinese government and once they they get the green-light to enter the U.S., they will undercut our manufacturers and suppliers, wreak havoc on our industry, and take our jobs. https://t.co/XXsctAbTwI
- Sep 11, 20262.4x their median
The Postal Service should be delivering the mail. Not deciding who gets to vote by mail and who doesn’t. https://t.co/ojJCxJpDcp
- Sep 10, 20262.4x their median
President Trump’s continued tariffs on Canada are hurting American families and businesses. Read my joint statement with @ChrisCoons, @SenatorShaheen, @SenAmyKlobuchar and @PattyMurray: The states we represent rely on Canada as a key trading partner and our primary export market. We have deep ties with our neighbors to the north, and we share one of the world’s most enduring defense partnerships. We have built two powerful nations over many decades by working together, growing our economies together, and securing our homelands together. Our countries have achieved great things by working closely together, and we still can.
- Sep 20, 20262.2x their median
The housing crisis is really being felt across Michigan from Ironwood to Detroit to Grand Rapids. If we want our kids to stay in Michigan, we need to build more housing so they can actually afford it. https://t.co/ZI8430OnTQ
- Sep 10, 20262.1x their median
President Trump should not be deciding who gets to vote by mail. That is up to the states and to Congress. His new rule limiting vote by mail is unconstitutional. https://t.co/jluKx8Xc1f
- Sep 11, 20262.1x their median
I was in Manhattan on September 11. It changed my life. That was the day I, and so many others of my generation, decided to completely change our lives and sign up to serve our country. I’ve heard us referred to as “9-11 Babies”, given the surge of young people who signed up for the military, intelligence community, State Department and other national service. I recently had the opportunity to take my nephew to the 9-11 Memorial and museum in New York. For the first time in a long time, I spent 3 straight hours thinking about 9-11, and telling someone who wasn’t yet born when it happened what it was like. Here’s what I said. Today, you’ll see image after image of the towers coming down. The stories of tragedies and heroism fill up the room. But whenever I think about that day, I try and focus on something else from the days and weeks afterwards: The sense of unity across the country that emerged out of the rubble. The shared sense of purpose, unlike anything I have felt before or since. The gut-wrenching appreciation for the firefighters and civilians who sacrificed their lives trying to save others. And above all, the feeling that we as Americans were on the same team. We certainly weren't perfect. In those early months, Muslims and immigrants were targeted. And the events of 9-11 kicked off an era of significant mistakes in wars far from home that we’re still grappling with today. But that feeling of a shared bond among all Americans in the early weeks after the attack is something I’m so glad I got to experience. Because it’s the thing that I think we’re missing the most today.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 177 interactions against 159K followers, an engagement rate of 0.113%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 3.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 7.5x its own typical post.
- What is Sen. Elissa Slotkin's engagement rate on X?
- Sen. Elissa Slotkin (@SenatorSlotkin) has an engagement rate of 0.113%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 158,516 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.113%, Sen. Elissa Slotkin sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SenatorSlotkin have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SenatorSlotkin post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.