Back to @SenTomCotton's profile

Tom Cotton engagement report

@SenTomCotton - 818K followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.017%
of 818K followers
Per impression
1.13%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
1.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
140
interactions (median)
Saved
0.008%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 818K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #farmbill.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tom Cotton's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, Tom Cotton sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video77% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 77% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 2026148x their median

    President Donald J. Trump is taking historic action to protect the value of American citizenship by ENDING the practice of birth tourism. The privilege of United States citizenship is a priceless and profound gift. https://t.co/NAvEhHNioQ

    15K3.7K1.6K199740K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202686x their median

    Beef prices are too high for a simple reason: Our cattle herd is too small. Imported beef below market prices will only put more pressure on our cattlemen. I have advised the President against this ill-advised action in the past and I now urge him to reconsider. We need to support our cattlemen, grow the herd, and let the market work.

    5.9K7854.9K3801.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202661x their median

    The United States stands with forces and friends of freedom around the world. Eliminating radical, anti-American regimes—like Iran—makes America a safer place. https://t.co/yJkXbPrQlF

    5.2K1.6K1.7K135384K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202657x their median

    Under no circumstances should sworn enemies of the United States come to our country to spread their radical, anti-American views. https://t.co/nexFEbDHqm

    4.8K1.0K2.0K13282K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202654x their median

    Iran’s revolutionary fanatics are never going to make the kind of deal we could accept. It’s time to finish the job and prevent Iran from blocking the Strait of Hormuz. https://t.co/BFEpDTqURX

    4.7K1.2K1.5K111101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202651x their median

    Socialists and Marxists are taking over the Democratic Party. The radical left will stop at nothing to impose socialism on our country. https://t.co/7RXSdPEqKA

    3.2K8403.0K19986K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202634x their median

    BREAKING: DOJ sources tell me Senate GOP leaders (Thune/Cotton) are refusing to declassify a key John Brennan transcript in order to "protect [then-SSCI Chair (2020-21)] Marco [Rubio] for a presidential run because Marco looks bad kissing [Dem Vice Chair Mark] Warner's ass" during the closed-door deposition, in which Brennan allegedly perjures himself regarding the Obama-ordered 2016 ICA and the Steele dossier.

    3.1K1.2K327109254K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202633x their median

    Fauci knew the risks. He hid them. He must be held accountable. https://t.co/U4gWyEzFWG

    2.9K4471.1K4347K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202626x their median

    Republicans cut taxes, secured the border, and invested in our military. Radical Democrats want to defund the police and protect illegal aliens. The choice is clear. https://t.co/kELrHV4O00

    9282722.3K16091K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202625x their median

    Democratic Socialists will make your life more expensive. They want to ban fossil fuels, grant amnesty to illegal aliens, and raise your taxes. If they succeed, the cost increases under Biden will pale in comparison.

    1.1K2292.0K111134K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#farmbill

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 818K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.13% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.52% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 77% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 148x its own typical post.

What is Tom Cotton's engagement rate on X?
Tom Cotton (@SenTomCotton) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 817,852 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, Tom Cotton sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SenTomCotton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SenTomCotton post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going