Back to @SenTedCruz's profile

Senator Ted Cruz engagement report

@SenTedCruz - 4.2M followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 4.2M followers
Per impression
1.02%
65K views on a typical post
Reach
1.55%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
660
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.13/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 660 interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Senator Ted Cruz's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Senator Ted Cruz sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 380 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 202626x their median

    I asked counterterrorism expert Kyle Shideler whether the Muslim Brotherhood partners with the Democratic Socialists of America. His answer: Yes. I asked whether this “Red-Green Alliance” is united by hostility toward America. His answer: Yes, and by a revolutionary objective of overthrowing the U.S. Constitution.

    11K4.9K1.2K347240K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202622x their median

    Jack Smith tried to secretly obtain my phone records. AT&T refused because it concluded his demand violated the Constitution. And what did Smith do? He didn’t go to court. He didn’t fight. He didn’t do a damn thing. Why? Because he knew if he went to court, he would lose. https://t.co/wiLk6gtaKw

    11K2.0K1.7K79175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202622x their median

    After a Monday evening videoconference of the Presidents and Chancellors of the Southeastern Conference, the Conference is issuing the following statement: https://t.co/kwWxGz5CQ3

    11K1.3K9347653.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202622x their median

    “The Protect College Sport Act just passed in the U.S. Senate by a vote of 77-22. This is a really big deal. It will not only save college sports, it will save the colleges themselves.” - President Donald J. Trump 🇺🇸 https://t.co/U98cOLT3z2

    12K1.8K85792433K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202619x their median

    Pat McAfee nailed it: College sports are in “absolute chaos,” there are no rules anyone can reliably follow, and Congress is now “our only option.” Coach Saban put the absurdity plainly: “Would we ever think that an NFL player could come back and play in college? It’s absolutely crazy.” College sports cannot survive as a courtroom free-for-all. It is time to pass the Protect College Sports Act, send it to President Trump’s desk, and sign it on College GameDay this fall.

    10K8618311514.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202617x their median

    Jack Smith and I had never met. Yet while investigating Donald Trump, his team wanted to know whom I spoke to, when I spoke to them, and for how long. They subpoenaed records associated with my personal and office phones, and obtained a court order preventing me from knowing about it. For years, Jack Smith was able to ask his questions in secret, without me in the room. Today, the Senate got to ask questions. Unlike Jack Smith, we did so in public. The American people can judge for themselves.

    8.7K1.8K79853158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202616x their median

    I held a hearing today in which experts established that the Muslim Brotherhood and DSA communists are united by a shared hatred of America, Israel, Western civilization, capitalism, and democracy, and a revolutionary objective to overthrow the U.S. Constitution. That is why this issue is so critical. The Brotherhood’s American network has spent decades building influence inside our nonprofits, political organizations, universities, courts, and taxpayer-funded programs. Here are my full remarks:

    6.7K2.5K892138204K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202613x their median

    NEW: Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who called today's Senate hearing on Muslim Brotherhood networks in the U.S., just used his opening statement to blast the Senate Democrats who boycotted the hearing: "You may notice that there are empty chairs on the Democrat side of the dais. The American people should ask themselves, why? Not a single member of the minority decided that a hearing on terrorism was worth their time. It is an embarrassment and a disservice to the thousands of American victims of the Muslim Brotherhood, including, most recently, the dozens of Americans who died on October 7th at the hand of Gaza's Muslim Brotherhood branch, Hamas."

    6.5K1.7K1193389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202611x their median

    Israeli companies are betting big on Texas, investing $3.2 billion and creating more than 4,200 jobs across our state. Now that investment is expanding into AI, cyber, defense, water, and agriculture. Texas gets the jobs, the capital, and the technology. That’s a partnership worth growing.

    4.3K5502.5K192408K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.5x their median

    NEW: Former Seahawks RB TJ Harden plans to enter the NCAA transfer portal, @PeteNakos reports. Harden played college ball at SMU and UCLA. https://t.co/MWRFMxNYyl

    4.5K2585671.1K5.2M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 660 interactions against 4.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 65K times each, and 1.02% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.55% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Senator Ted Cruz's engagement rate on X?
Senator Ted Cruz (@SenTedCruz) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,165,283 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Senator Ted Cruz sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SenTedCruz have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SenTedCruz post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going