Senator Ron Johnson engagement report
@SenRonJohnson - 709K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 709K followers, an engagement rate of 0.191%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Senator Ron Johnson's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.191%, Senator Ron Johnson sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 155.6% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 53K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 52K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 63K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 75K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 105K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 69K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 60K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 238K |
| Monday | 0% | 302K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 302K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 257K |
| Thursday | -2% | 250K |
| Friday | -3% | 259K |
| Saturday | +3% | 233K |
Best tweets
- Jun 18, 202611x their median
https://t.co/pPI52Hznwv
- Jul 29, 202611x their median
Four mistakes Fauci made when pleading the 5th today: 1. Once a witness opens the door to a topic, the witness cannot then plead the 5th with regard to that topic. And Fauci’s opening statement opened many doors widely, including when he claimed he had a “decades-long record of cooperating with Congress” including “during and after the Covid pandemic” when he “appeared multiple times for hearings in the Senate and the House.” That puts the question of whether he properly cooperated when responding to questions, including prior questions from Senator Paul, in all of those hearings directly at issue. Here are a few of his statements through which he opened the door broadly: •“I served at the NIH for over 54 years, 38 of those as Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.” •“Over that period, I proved that I believe in and respect the value of legitimate congressional oversight. In fact, I testified before and/or briefed Senate and House committees well over 200 times over those 38 years.” •“During and after the Covid pandemic, I have appeared multiple times for hearings in the Senate and the House, usually under oath, and sat for several days-long, transcribed sworn interviews answering questions about the very issues that are now the subject of this hearing.” •“However, Given Senator Paul’s obvious obsession with calling for my prosecution, his repeated slanderous comments about me, and recently, his publicly releasing my unredacted personal diary, aimed at embarrassing and intimidating me, the only conclusion I can reach is that the sole reason he is calling me before this committee is to get me to say something – anything – that could vindicate his repeated public pledges that I end up, in his words, ‘behind bars.’ Any reasonable person who has followed his unhinged obsession with me would readily come to the same conclusion.” •“Therefore, although it pains me to do so because of the respect I have for the legislative branch of government and my decades-long record of cooperating with Congress, under the advice of my attorneys, I will invoke my right under the 5th amendment of the constitution to refrain from answering your questions.” 2. The 5th amendment can only be used when answering a question which would present real and appreciable danger. Thus, his use of the 5th during the hearing for questions that clearly don’t meet this standard, including about the color of his tie and what day of the week it is, reflects on its improper use during the hearing overall. 3. Since invoking the 5th is question specific, announcing before even hearing the questions that he would “refrain from answering [the committee’s] questions” under the 5th was itself improper. 4. Finally, ignoring the broad presidential pardon he received, as if it doesn’t exist, including for questions that would clearly fall within the parameters of that incredibly broad pardon, was a misstep that may come back to bite him later. @SenRandPaul @SenRonJohnson @HawleyMO @berniemoreno @SenatorLankford
- Aug 13, 20267.1x their median
Anthony Fauci was lying through his teeth. We advise pregnant women not to eat sushi or have a glass of wine — yet Fauci and other health officials urged them to get the experimental gene therapy injection during all phases of their pregnancy. We will never know how many babies were miscarried because of Fauci’s lies.
- Apr 1, 20256.3x their median
Fellow Republicans, America heard us loud and clear: WE HAVE A SPENDING PROBLEM So, are we willing to fix it?
- Aug 12, 20264.6x their median
Soon after the COVID shot was released, VAERS was flooded with adverse events. The “red flags” and safety signals were screaming at Anthony Fauci and Peter Marks. They had to close their eyes and ears not to see them. https://t.co/lIkupToTGD
- Aug 6, 20263.2x their median
What Dr. Fauci displayed last Wednesday was contempt for Congress, contempt for this committee, and contempt for our investigation. I voted to hold Dr. Fauci in contempt of Congress, and our investigation has only just begun. https://t.co/PN0Nlli7pk
- Aug 10, 20262.9x their median
It is well past time for a COVID reckoning. It is well past time for Fauci and his henchmen to tell the truth. https://t.co/X7mCZp8jmE
- Aug 6, 20261.8x their median
Dr. Fauci received a sweeping pardon but may still be vulnerable to state charges. But the first step of accountability is exposure of truth — and my investigation has only just begun. https://t.co/xnNE2Ba9sF
- Aug 4, 2026
Democrats continually accuse Republicans of slashing Medicaid. That's simply not true. The reality is that Medicaid spending is up 10% this fiscal year. https://t.co/mKQE8x5PxL
- Jul 31, 2026
In the heartbreaking aftermath of a tornado’s devastation, the outpouring of volunteer help is heartwarming and inspiring. God bless the volunteers, first responders, and all those lending a helping hand. https://t.co/66cCWwXaC2
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 709K followers, an engagement rate of 0.191%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 2.68% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Senator Ron Johnson's engagement rate on X?
- Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) has an engagement rate of 0.191%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 709,411 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.191%, Senator Ron Johnson sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SenRonJohnson have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SenRonJohnson post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.