Back to @SenMarkKelly's profile

Senator Mark Kelly engagement report

@SenMarkKelly - 289K followers on X

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.211%
of 289K followers
Per impression
4.16%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
5.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
609
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 609 interactions against 289K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 4.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 45x its own typical post.

Measured over 42 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #chiricahuanationalparkact.

Compared with accounts its own size

Senator Mark Kelly's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.211%, Senator Mark Kelly sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video57% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 57% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 340 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 3, 202345x their median

    I am humbled and honored to continue serving Arizonans in the U.S. Senate. Now let’s get to work. https://t.co/2hc8SoZyQI

    15K1.3K11K3302.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202624x their median

    Starting a war against Iran without a plan. Threatening to bomb Oman. Sailors suffering aboard the USS Lincoln. Reducing joint military exercises with South Korea. None of these things have made our country stronger or safer. Trump doesn’t know what he’s doing.

    10K1.9K2.1K130209K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202621x their median

    Trump has made more stock trades than all members of Congress combined since he was sworn in. I’ve made zero, and that’s the way it should be. https://t.co/vxPj9xo5kg

    9.2K1.9K1.6K7594K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202616x their median

    This weekend, Trump announced Ukraine and Russia agreed to an “energy ceasefire,” which has turned out to be completely false. Neither side agreed to anything, and Russia attacked Ukraine’s energy infrastructure again. He’s making up fake ceasefires because he wants Ukraine to stop striking Russian oil refineries. Those strikes have been having a real impact in the war, and stopping them is a gift to Putin. It’s important to understand that any shortage of diesel fuel is because of Trump’s decision to go to war with Iran without understanding that they would shut down the Strait of Hormuz, which is perhaps one of the biggest geopolitical blunders in modern history. Instead of admitting that and trying to solve the problem he created, Trump is trying to put the blame on a country that’s literally fighting for its survival against Russia. Siding with Putin and Russia seems to be a mainstay of this presidency. Even his supporters are piling on with Elon Musk tweeting that Zelenskyy has gone “too far.” Whose side are they on? Regardless, the Ukrainians are making progress, and if things continue to go well, it’s a real possibility that Putin could be pressured to accept a deal that maintains Ukrainian sovereignty. Anyone who supports the Russians in this conflict will find themselves on the wrong side of history and the wrong side of America’s interests. Trump, Elon, etc. should try to avoid being this century’s Neville Chamberlain.

    7.8K1.6K44559122K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202616x their median

    Pete Hegseth is blocking promotions and firing generals, especially women and people of color, and it’s costing us some of our most experienced and qualified servicemembers. That makes our country less safe. https://t.co/7uh0iRqU7R

    6.3K1.7K1.4K7973K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 202615x their median

    It's pretty simple: If you're making decisions that move markets, you shouldn't be trading stocks. I don't trade individual stocks. And I'm working to make sure no one in Congress can either.

    8.0K95047734101K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202615x their median

    Here’s a picture of the seating chart at Trump’s AI meeting. What do you see? More than a dozen billionaires, all getting richer from AI, making decisions that affect your life. https://t.co/KQwgdxDXls

    5.0K1.9K2.1K10198K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202611x their median

    Trump took taxpayer money meant for border security and used it to fund political TV ads of himself just before an election. Let's call it what it is: corruption. https://t.co/0dLs4uC08F

    4.6K1.9K4396350K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 20269.8x their median

    There’s always money for what Trump and his allies want, but never enough to make life better for working families. That’s a decision. It’s the job of Congress to hold this corrupt administration accountable, and I won’t stop working until we do.

    4.5K7546893748K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.9x their median

    This administration has been at war with science since day one. The result: measles outbreaks, recalled foods, and big cuts to medical research. Science is the foundation of American prosperity and health. Let's get back to that.

    4.4K6593771838K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#chiricahuanationalparkact

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 609 interactions against 289K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 42 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 4.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 42 posts sampled, 57% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 28K interactions, about 45x its own typical post.

What is Senator Mark Kelly's engagement rate on X?
Senator Mark Kelly (@SenMarkKelly) has an engagement rate of 0.211%, based on the median interactions across 42 original posts from the last 30 days against 288,755 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.211%, Senator Mark Kelly sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SenMarkKelly have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SenMarkKelly post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going