Senator Adam Schiff engagement report
@SenAdamSchiff - 3.4M followers on X
Measured over 96 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 3.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 96 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 2.74% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 96 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 34% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nortefire, #thisisballhalla.
Measured over 96 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #nortefire, #thisisballhalla.
Compared with accounts its own size
Senator Adam Schiff's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.029%, Senator Adam Schiff sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 79% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 13% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 301 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 10, 202625x their median
We went from sanctioning Russian oil to buying it in three weeks. Instead of ending his disastrous war in Iran, Trump is now funding Russia's war in Ukraine. We used to hold dictators and autocrats accountable. Now our president negotiated a deal to fund Putin's unjust war. https://t.co/zLmGLrB07R
- Sep 30, 202622x their median
The exact moment I knew Republican attacks on Jack Smith were a colossal mistake: https://t.co/6GrqRSwpJw
- Sep 30, 202615x their median
This is the Republican playbook: Attack Jack Smith. Make scurrilous allegations (even when they blow up in your face). But, for God’s sake, don’t talk about the facts of what the president did on January 6th. https://t.co/GGqH03Wc9U
- Sep 16, 202615x their median
Kash Patel claims that no one at the FBI was fired because they worked on an investigation into President Trump. And suggests that thousands of agents just, coincidentally, retired. This is false and absurd. We will investigate the wrongful termination of hundreds of FBI agents.
- Aug 23, 202613x their median
While you struggle with the cost of gas, Trump offers you the spectacle of an IndyCar race hoping you will not notice. More taxpayer money spent on his self-aggrandizing distractions. And you get higher taxes and higher costs. https://t.co/gYca1FDqJh
- Sep 29, 202611x their median
If Congressional Republicans wanted the American people to know the truth about Jack Smith's investigation, they would subpoena his report. But they don't. It's easier to attack him, than confront the evidence of the President’s guilt. https://t.co/wIEPlf5fGF
- Aug 8, 20268.8x their median
As I said in his confirmation hearing, the fundamental problem with Todd Blanche isn’t that he’s inexperienced or unintelligent. It’s that he’s never been able to shed his role as criminal defense lawyer for Donald Trump. He cannot and will never do it.
- Sep 2, 20268.1x their median
As a result of Trump’s tariffs and war, American families are spending $3,500 more per year on the cost of food, gas and medicine. Meanwhile... Trump and his family have made more than $4 BILLION off the presidency. That's the cost of corruption.
- Sep 1, 20267.3x their median
A whistleblower is sounding the alarm that Trump is violating a court order ahead of the midterm elections. This is a brazen threat to mail-in voting that could prevent voters from receiving ballots and disenfranchise millions of Americans. The Administration must stop this dangerous effort immediately, and USPS leaders owe answers to the American people. https://t.co/QLRfLEOyBG
- Aug 11, 20267.2x their median
Devastated to learn of the passing of California’s pride, Jackie, earlier today. Any visitor to my Washington office in the past year knows our office proudly showed the livestream of Jackie’s nest showing alongside C-SPAN and national news. We join all of California of mourning the passing of one of our most famous icons.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 3.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 96 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 2.74% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 96 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 34% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 25x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nortefire, #thisisballhalla.
- What is Senator Adam Schiff's engagement rate on X?
- Senator Adam Schiff (@SenAdamSchiff) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 96 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,398,226 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.029%, Senator Adam Schiff sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SenAdamSchiff have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SenAdamSchiff post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.97 posts per day across the measured window.